Skip to main content
485WP PERFORMANCE vs 485WP 19 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Heckert Solar ZEUS 3.0+ 108 485WP PERFORMANCE vs Heckert Solar ZEUS 3.0+ 108 485WP

Heckert Solar ZEUS 3.0+ 108 485WP PERFORMANCE
Heckert Solar
ZEUS 3.0+ 108 485WP PERFORMANCE
485 Wp 24.30 % Back Contact Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
Heckert Solar ZEUS 3.0+ 108 485WP
Heckert Solar
ZEUS 3.0+ 108 485WP
485 Wp 24.30 % Back Contact Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

Identical on every published parameter

All 19 comparable parameters agree. Two records this alike are usually one panel sold under two names, or two bins of the same production line - decide on price and on who you would rather buy from.

How alike are they
19 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

0 of 19 parameters

Every comparable parameter agrees. The full specification is below.

02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.260 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
485WP PERFORMANCE
15,972 kWh
485WP
15,972 kWh
Lifetime gap
No difference
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 485WP PERFORMANCE 485WP
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 485 W 485 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 96.1% of rated power 466 W 466 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 92.2% of rated power 447 W 447 W
Hot roof 70 °C 88.3% of rated power 428 W 428 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 485WP PERFORMANCE 485WP Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 485 Wp 485 Wp Same
Module efficiency 24.30 % 24.30 % Same
Power density 242.7 Wp/m² 242.7 Wp/m² Same
Open-circuit voltage 41.00 V 41.00 V Same
Voltage at max power 34.60 V 34.60 V Same
Short-circuit current 14.84 A 14.84 A Same
Current at max power 14.02 A 14.02 A Same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.260 %/°C -0.260 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 1762x1134x30 mm 1762x1134x30 mm Same
Module area 1.998 m² 1.998 m² Same
Weight 24.2 kg 24.2 kg Same
Weight per kWp 49.9 kg/kWp 49.9 kg/kWp Same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.45 %/yr 0.45 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology Back Contact Back Contact Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 108 108 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#131 vs #131
Tied - the same position in the database
Power density
#140 vs #140
Tied - the same position in the database
Heat behaviour
#511 vs #511
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#3,275 vs #3,275
Tied - the same position in the database
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#2,068 vs #2,068
Tied - the same position in the database
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Heckert Solar
Heckert Solar ZEUS 3.0+ 108 485WP PERFORMANCE vs Heckert Solar ZEUS 3.0+ 108 490WP
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Heckert Solar
Heckert Solar ZEUS 3.0+ 108 485WP PERFORMANCE vs Heckert Solar ZEUS 3.0+ 108 490WP PERFORMANCE
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Heckert Solar
Heckert Solar ZEUS 3.0+ 108 485WP PERFORMANCE vs Heckert Solar ZEUS 2.2 715
15 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Heckert Solar
Heckert Solar ZEUS 3.0+ 108 485WP PERFORMANCE vs Heckert Solar ZEUS 2.2-715
15 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Heckert Solar
Heckert Solar ZEUS 3.0+ 108 485WP PERFORMANCE vs Heckert Solar ZEUS 2.2 710
15 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Heckert Solar
Heckert Solar ZEUS 3.0+ 108 485WP PERFORMANCE vs Heckert Solar ZEUS 2.2-710
15 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Heckert Solar ZEUS 3.0+ 108 485WP PERFORMANCE or Heckert Solar ZEUS 3.0+ 108 485WP?
According to our database: both panels are closely matched on key specs - the decision often comes down to price and local availability. See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Heckert Solar ZEUS 3.0+ 108 485WP PERFORMANCE and Heckert Solar ZEUS 3.0+ 108 485WP?
Heckert Solar ZEUS 3.0+ 108 485WP PERFORMANCE has a module efficiency of 24.30%, while Heckert Solar ZEUS 3.0+ 108 485WP is 24.30%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Heckert Solar ZEUS 3.0+ 108 485WP PERFORMANCE use vs Heckert Solar ZEUS 3.0+ 108 485WP?
Heckert Solar ZEUS 3.0+ 108 485WP PERFORMANCE uses Back Contact cells; Heckert Solar ZEUS 3.0+ 108 485WP uses Back Contact. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Heckert Solar ZEUS 3.0+ 108 485WP PERFORMANCE and Heckert Solar ZEUS 3.0+ 108 485WP?
Heckert Solar ZEUS 3.0+ 108 485WP PERFORMANCE has a 30 years power warranty; Heckert Solar ZEUS 3.0+ 108 485WP has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Heckert Solar ZEUS 3.0+ 108 485WP PERFORMANCE and Heckert Solar ZEUS 3.0+ 108 485WP bifacial panels?
Both Heckert Solar ZEUS 3.0+ 108 485WP PERFORMANCE and Heckert Solar ZEUS 3.0+ 108 485WP are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 16 Heckert Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.