Q-Cells Q.TRON BLK M-G2+ 425 vs Q-Cells Q.TRON BLK M-G2.C1+/AC (Power class 430W)
VS
The verdict
G2+ 425 leads on the differences that matter
The largest is weight: 1.8 kg lighter. 13 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 6 differencesHow alike are they
13
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
6 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
G2+ 425
G2.C1+/AC (Power class 430W)
Difference
Weight
21.2 kg
22.9 kg
1.8 kg lighter
Weight per kWp
49.9 kg/kWp
53.4 kg/kWp
3.5 kg/kWp lighter
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.300 %/°C
0.010 %/°C better in heat
Module efficiency
21.80 %
22.00 %
0.20 pp more efficient
Cell count
108
216
108 cells apart
Dimensions
1722x1134x30 mm
1722x1134x40 mm
1722x1134x30 mm vs 1722x1134x40 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
G2+ 425
14,338 kWh
G2.C1+/AC (Power class 430W)
14,507 kWh
Lifetime gap
169 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
G2+ 425
G2.C1+/AC (Power class 430W)
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
425 W
430 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.5% of rated power
407 W
411 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.0% of rated power
388 W
391 W
Hot roof
70 °C
86.5% of rated power
370 W
372 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
G2+ 425
G2.C1+/AC (Power class 430W)
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
425 Wp
430 Wp
Effectively the same
Module efficiency
21.80 %
22.00 %
+0.20 pp for G2.C1+/AC (Power class 430W)
Power density
217.6 Wp/m²
220.2 Wp/m²
Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage
39.03 V
39.32 V
Effectively the same
Voltage at max power
32.74 V
32.94 V
Effectively the same
Short-circuit current
13.66 A
13.74 A
Effectively the same
Current at max power
12.98 A
13.05 A
Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.300 %/°C
+0.010 %/°C for G2+ 425
Mechanical
Dimensions
1722x1134x30 mm
1722x1134x40 mm
1722x1134x30 mm vs 1722x1134x40 mm
Module area
1.953 m²
1.953 m²
Same
Weight
21.2 kg
22.9 kg
-1.8 kg for G2+ 425
Weight per kWp
49.9 kg/kWp
53.4 kg/kWp
-3.5 kg/kWp for G2+ 425
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
25 yrs
25 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
25 yrs
25 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.33 %/yr
0.33 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
N-type
N-type
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
108
216
108 cells apart
Bifacial
No
No
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#7,022
vs
#6,517
G2.C1+/AC (Power class 430W) leads by 505 places
Power density
#7,172
vs
#6,481
G2.C1+/AC (Power class 430W) leads by 691 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165
vs
#6,093
G2+ 425 leads by 3,928 places
Weight
#3,266
vs
#7,269
G2+ 425 leads by 4,003 places
Warranty
#9,798
vs
#9,798
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#9,034
vs
#8,695
G2.C1+/AC (Power class 430W) leads by 339 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Q-Cells Q.TRON BLK M-G2+ 425 vs Q-Cells Q.TRON BLK M-G2.H1+/AC (Power class 440W)
8 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Q-Cells Q.TRON BLK M-G2+ 425 vs Q-Cells Q.TRON BLK M-G2+ 440
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Q-Cells Q.TRON BLK M-G2+ 425 vs Q-Cells Q.TRON BLK M-G2.D1+/AC (Power class 435W)
8 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Q-Cells Q.TRON BLK M-G2+ 425 vs Q-Cells Q.TRON BLK M-G2+ 435
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Q-Cells Q.TRON BLK M-G2+ 425 vs Q-Cells Q.TRON BLK M-G2+ 430
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Q-Cells Q.TRON BLK M-G2+ 425 vs Q-Cells Q.TRON BLK M-G2.E1+/AC (Power class 425W)
5 differences, the largest is weight per kwp
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Q-Cells Q.TRON BLK M-G2+ 425 or Q-Cells Q.TRON BLK M-G2.C1+/AC (Power class 430W)?
According to our database: Q-Cells Q.TRON BLK M-G2.C1+/AC (Power class 430 W) has higher module efficiency (22.00% vs 21.80%); Q-Cells Q.TRON BLK M-G2+ 425 tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.290%/°C vs -0.300%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Q-Cells Q.TRON BLK M-G2+ 425 and Q-Cells Q.TRON BLK M-G2.C1+/AC (Power class 430W)?
Q-Cells Q.TRON BLK M-G2+ 425 has a module efficiency of 21.80%, while Q-Cells Q.TRON BLK M-G2.C1+/AC (Power class 430 W) is 22.00%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Q-Cells Q.TRON BLK M-G2+ 425 use vs Q-Cells Q.TRON BLK M-G2.C1+/AC (Power class 430W)?
Q-Cells Q.TRON BLK M-G2+ 425 uses N-type cells; Q-Cells Q.TRON BLK M-G2.C1+/AC (Power class 430 W) uses N-type. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Q-Cells Q.TRON BLK M-G2+ 425 and Q-Cells Q.TRON BLK M-G2.C1+/AC (Power class 430W)?
Q-Cells Q.TRON BLK M-G2+ 425 has a 25 years power warranty; Q-Cells Q.TRON BLK M-G2.C1+/AC (Power class 430 W) has a 25 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Shop prices: See 28 Q-Cells offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.

