Skip to main content
HN21RN-66QT665W vs HN21N-66HT735W 6 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Hanersun HN21RN-66QT665W vs Hanersun HN21N-66HT735W

Hanersun HN21RN-66QT665W
Hanersun
HN21RN-66QT665W
665 Wp 24.60 % TOPCon Bifacial
VS
Hanersun HN21N-66HT735W
Hanersun
HN21N-66HT735W
735 Wp 23.70 % TOPCon Bifacial
The verdict

HN21RN-66QT665W leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.90 pp more efficient. 6 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 13 differences
How alike are they
6 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

13 of 19 parameters
Parameter HN21RN-66QT665W HN21N-66HT735W Difference
Module efficiency 24.60 % 23.70 % 0.90 pp more efficient
Rated power 665 Wp 735 Wp 70 W more power
Power density 246.2 Wp/m² 236.6 Wp/m² 9.6 Wp/m² higher
Weight 32.5 kg 37.4 kg 4.9 kg lighter
Temperature coefficient -0.260 %/°C -0.280 %/°C 0.020 %/°C better in heat
Short-circuit current 16.57 A 18.62 A 2.05 A apart
Module area 2.701 m² 3.106 m² 0.405 m² apart
Annual degradation 0.35 %/yr 0.40 %/yr 0.05 %/yr slower
Cell count 264 132 132 cells apart
Current at max power 15.67 A 17.61 A 1.94 A apart
Weight per kWp 48.9 kg/kWp 50.9 kg/kWp 2.0 kg/kWp lighter
Open-circuit voltage 50.72 V 49.60 V 1.12 V apart
Dimensions 2382x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm 2382x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
HN21RN-66QT665W
22,486 kWh
HN21N-66HT735W
24,661 kWh
Lifetime gap
2,175 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario HN21RN-66QT665W HN21N-66HT735W
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 665 W 735 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.8% of rated power 639 W 704 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.6% of rated power 613 W 673 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.4% of rated power 587 W 642 W
03

Full specification

Parameter HN21RN-66QT665W HN21N-66HT735W Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 665 Wp 735 Wp +70 W for HN21N-66HT735W
Module efficiency 24.60 % 23.70 % +0.90 pp for HN21RN-66QT665W
Power density 246.2 Wp/m² 236.6 Wp/m² +9.6 Wp/m² for HN21RN-66QT665W
Open-circuit voltage 50.72 V 49.60 V 1.12 V apart
Voltage at max power 42.46 V 41.76 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 16.57 A 18.62 A 2.05 A apart
Current at max power 15.67 A 17.61 A 1.94 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.260 %/°C -0.280 %/°C +0.020 %/°C for HN21RN-66QT665W
Mechanical
Dimensions 2382x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm 2382x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
Module area 2.701 m² 3.106 m² 0.405 m² apart
Weight 32.5 kg 37.4 kg -4.9 kg for HN21RN-66QT665W
Weight per kWp 48.9 kg/kWp 50.9 kg/kWp -2.0 kg/kWp for HN21RN-66QT665W
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 15 yrs 15 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.35 %/yr 0.40 %/yr -0.05 %/yr for HN21RN-66QT665W
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 264 132 132 cells apart
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#51 vs #517
HN21RN-66QT665W leads by 466 places
Power density
#42 vs #582
HN21RN-66QT665W leads by 540 places
Heat behaviour
#511 vs #1,309
HN21RN-66QT665W leads by 798 places
Weight
#2,555 vs #4,262
HN21RN-66QT665W leads by 1,707 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#409 vs #155
HN21N-66HT735W leads by 254 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Hanersun
Hanersun HN21RN-66QT665W vs Hanersun HN21N-66HT750W
11 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Hanersun
Hanersun HN21RN-66QT665W vs Hanersun HN21N-66HT745W
11 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Hanersun
Hanersun HN21RN-66QT665W vs Hanersun HN21N-66HT740W
11 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Hanersun
Hanersun HN21RN-66QT665W vs Hanersun HN21RN-66QT670W
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Hanersun
Hanersun HN21RN-66QT665W vs Hanersun HN21RN-66QT660W
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Hanersun
Hanersun HN21RN-66QT665W vs Hanersun HN21RN-66QT655W
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Hanersun HN21RN-66QT665W or Hanersun HN21N-66HT735W?
According to our database: Hanersun HN21RN-66QT665 W has higher module efficiency (24.60% vs 23.70%); Hanersun HN21RN-66QT665 W tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.260%/°C vs -0.280%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Hanersun HN21RN-66QT665W and Hanersun HN21N-66HT735W?
Hanersun HN21RN-66QT665 W has a module efficiency of 24.60%, while Hanersun HN21N-66HT735 W is 23.70%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Hanersun HN21RN-66QT665W use vs Hanersun HN21N-66HT735W?
Hanersun HN21RN-66QT665 W uses TOPCon cells; Hanersun HN21N-66HT735 W uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Hanersun HN21RN-66QT665W and Hanersun HN21N-66HT735W?
Hanersun HN21RN-66QT665 W has a 30 years power warranty; Hanersun HN21N-66HT735 W has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Hanersun HN21RN-66QT665W and Hanersun HN21N-66HT735W bifacial panels?
Both Hanersun HN21RN-66QT665 W and Hanersun HN21N-66HT735 W are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 19 Hanersun offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.