Skip to main content
48HT460W vs 66QT670W 5 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Hanersun HN21RN-48HT460W vs Hanersun HN21RN-66QT670W

Hanersun HN21RN-48HT460W
Hanersun
HN21RN-48HT460W
460 Wp 23.00 % TOPCon Bifacial
VS
Hanersun HN21RN-66QT670W
Hanersun
HN21RN-66QT670W
670 Wp 24.80 % TOPCon Bifacial
The verdict

66QT670W leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 1.80 pp more efficient. 5 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 14 differences
How alike are they
5 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

14 of 19 parameters
Parameter 48HT460W 66QT670W Difference
Module efficiency 23.00 % 24.80 % 1.80 pp more efficient
Rated power 460 Wp 670 Wp 210 W more power
Power density 230.2 Wp/m² 248.0 Wp/m² 17.8 Wp/m² higher
Weight 24.1 kg 32.5 kg 8.4 kg lighter
Product warranty 25 yrs 15 yrs 10 yrs longer
Temperature coefficient -0.280 %/°C -0.260 %/°C 0.020 %/°C better in heat
Open-circuit voltage 36.13 V 50.84 V 14.71 V apart
Module area 1.998 m² 2.701 m² 0.703 m² apart
Weight per kWp 52.4 kg/kWp 48.5 kg/kWp 3.9 kg/kWp lighter
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.35 %/yr 0.05 %/yr slower
Voltage at max power 30.10 V 42.57 V 12.47 V apart
Cell count 96 264 168 cells apart
Short-circuit current 16.12 A 16.64 A 0.52 A apart
Dimensions 1762x1134x30 mm 2382x1134x30 mm 1762x1134x30 mm vs 2382x1134x30 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
48HT460W
15,434 kWh
66QT670W
22,655 kWh
Lifetime gap
7,221 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 48HT460W 66QT670W
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 460 W 670 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.8% of rated power 441 W 644 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.6% of rated power 421 W 618 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.4% of rated power 402 W 592 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 48HT460W 66QT670W Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 460 Wp 670 Wp +210 W for 66QT670W
Module efficiency 23.00 % 24.80 % +1.80 pp for 66QT670W
Power density 230.2 Wp/m² 248.0 Wp/m² +17.8 Wp/m² for 66QT670W
Open-circuit voltage 36.13 V 50.84 V 14.71 V apart
Voltage at max power 30.10 V 42.57 V 12.47 V apart
Short-circuit current 16.12 A 16.64 A 0.52 A apart
Current at max power 15.29 A 15.74 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.280 %/°C -0.260 %/°C +0.020 %/°C for 66QT670W
Mechanical
Dimensions 1762x1134x30 mm 2382x1134x30 mm 1762x1134x30 mm vs 2382x1134x30 mm
Module area 1.998 m² 2.701 m² 0.703 m² apart
Weight 24.1 kg 32.5 kg -8.4 kg for 48HT460W
Weight per kWp 52.4 kg/kWp 48.5 kg/kWp -3.9 kg/kWp for 66QT670W
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 25 yrs 15 yrs +10 yrs for 48HT460W
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.35 %/yr -0.05 %/yr for 66QT670W
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 96 264 168 cells apart
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#1,919 vs #12
66QT670W leads by 1,907 places
Power density
#1,876 vs #14
66QT670W leads by 1,862 places
Heat behaviour
#1,309 vs #511
66QT670W leads by 798 places
Weight
#5,883 vs #2,321
66QT670W leads by 3,562 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#5,278 vs #297
66QT670W leads by 4,981 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Hanersun
Hanersun HN21RN-48HT460W vs Hanersun HN21N-66HT750W
13 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Hanersun
Hanersun HN21RN-48HT460W vs Hanersun HN21N-66HT745W
13 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Hanersun
Hanersun HN21RN-48HT460W vs Hanersun HN21N-66HT740W
12 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Hanersun
Hanersun HN21RN-48HT460W vs Hanersun HN21N-66HT735W
12 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Hanersun
Hanersun HN21RN-48HT460W vs Hanersun HN21RN-66QT665W
13 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Hanersun
Hanersun HN21RN-48HT460W vs Hanersun HN21RN-66QT660W
13 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Hanersun HN21RN-48HT460W or Hanersun HN21RN-66QT670W?
According to our database: Hanersun HN21RN-66QT670 W has higher module efficiency (24.80% vs 23.00%); Hanersun HN21RN-66QT670 W tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.260%/°C vs -0.280%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Hanersun HN21RN-48HT460W and Hanersun HN21RN-66QT670W?
Hanersun HN21RN-48HT460 W has a module efficiency of 23.00%, while Hanersun HN21RN-66QT670 W is 24.80%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Hanersun HN21RN-48HT460W use vs Hanersun HN21RN-66QT670W?
Hanersun HN21RN-48HT460 W uses TOPCon cells; Hanersun HN21RN-66QT670 W uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Hanersun HN21RN-48HT460W and Hanersun HN21RN-66QT670W?
Hanersun HN21RN-48HT460 W has a 30 years power warranty; Hanersun HN21RN-66QT670 W has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Hanersun HN21RN-48HT460W and Hanersun HN21RN-66QT670W bifacial panels?
Both Hanersun HN21RN-48HT460 W and Hanersun HN21RN-66QT670 W are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 19 Hanersun offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.