Hanersun HN18N-72H595W vs Hanersun HN18N-54HT440W
VS
The verdict
72H595W leads on the differences that matter
The largest is rated power: 155 W more power. 8 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 11 differencesHow alike are they
8
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
11 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
72H595W
54HT440W
Difference
Rated power
595 Wp
440 Wp
155 W more power
Module efficiency
23.00 %
22.50 %
0.50 pp more efficient
Weight per kWp
43.7 kg/kWp
55.7 kg/kWp
12.0 kg/kWp lighter
Open-circuit voltage
52.00 V
38.70 V
13.30 V apart
Module area
2.583 m²
1.953 m²
0.631 m² apart
Power density
230.3 Wp/m²
225.3 Wp/m²
5.0 Wp/m² higher
Weight
26.0 kg
24.5 kg
1.5 kg lighter
Voltage at max power
43.80 V
32.70 V
11.10 V apart
Cell count
144
108
36 cells apart
Bifacial
No
Yes
No vs Yes
Dimensions
2278x1134x30 mm
1722x1134x30 mm
2278x1134x30 mm vs 1722x1134x30 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.280 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
72H595W
19,963 kWh
54HT440W
14,763 kWh
Lifetime gap
5,200 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
72H595W
54HT440W
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
595 W
440 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.8% of rated power
570 W
422 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.6% of rated power
545 W
403 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.4% of rated power
520 W
385 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
72H595W
54HT440W
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
595 Wp
440 Wp
+155 W for 72H595W
Module efficiency
23.00 %
22.50 %
+0.50 pp for 72H595W
Power density
230.3 Wp/m²
225.3 Wp/m²
+5.0 Wp/m² for 72H595W
Open-circuit voltage
52.00 V
38.70 V
13.30 V apart
Voltage at max power
43.80 V
32.70 V
11.10 V apart
Short-circuit current
14.41 A
14.26 A
Effectively the same
Current at max power
13.59 A
13.46 A
Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.280 %/°C
-0.280 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
2278x1134x30 mm
1722x1134x30 mm
2278x1134x30 mm vs 1722x1134x30 mm
Module area
2.583 m²
1.953 m²
0.631 m² apart
Weight
26.0 kg
24.5 kg
-1.5 kg for 54HT440W
Weight per kWp
43.7 kg/kWp
55.7 kg/kWp
-12.0 kg/kWp for 72H595W
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
25 yrs
25 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
TOPCon
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
144
108
36 cells apart
Bifacial
No
Yes
No vs Yes
04
14,129 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#1,970
vs
#4,281
72H595W leads by 2,311 places
Power density
#1,809
vs
#4,158
72H595W leads by 2,349 places
Heat behaviour
#1,347
vs
#1,347
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#333
vs
#10,132
72H595W leads by 9,799 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#1,345
vs
#6,681
72H595W leads by 5,336 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Hanersun
Hanersun HN18N-72H595W vs Hanersun HN18N-72HT600W
5 differences, the largest is weight
Same series, other bin
Hanersun
Hanersun HN18N-72H595W vs Hanersun HN18N-72HT595W
4 differences, the largest is weight
Same series, other bin
Hanersun
Hanersun HN18N-72H595W vs Hanersun HN18N-72H590W
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Hanersun
Hanersun HN18N-72H595W vs Hanersun HN18N-72HT590W
5 differences, the largest is weight
Same series, other bin
Hanersun
Hanersun HN18N-72H595W vs Hanersun HN18-72HT585W
8 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient
Same series, other bin
Hanersun
Hanersun HN18N-72H595W vs Hanersun HN18-72H585W
8 differences, the largest is performance warranty
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Hanersun HN18N-72H595W or Hanersun HN18N-54HT440W?
According to our database: Hanersun HN18N-72H595 W has higher module efficiency (23.00% vs 22.50%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Hanersun HN18N-72H595W and Hanersun HN18N-54HT440W?
Hanersun HN18N-72H595 W has a module efficiency of 23.00%, while Hanersun HN18N-54HT440 W is 22.50%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Hanersun HN18N-72H595W use vs Hanersun HN18N-54HT440W?
Hanersun HN18N-72H595 W uses TOPCon cells; Hanersun HN18N-54HT440 W uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Hanersun HN18N-72H595W and Hanersun HN18N-54HT440W?
Hanersun HN18N-72H595 W has a 30 years power warranty; Hanersun HN18N-54HT440 W has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Hanersun HN18N-72H595W and Hanersun HN18N-54HT440W bifacial panels?
Hanersun HN18N-54HT440 W is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Hanersun HN18N-72H595 W is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.
Shop prices: See 14 Hanersun offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.