Skip to main content
HN18N-72H595W vs HN18-72HT585W 11 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Hanersun HN18N-72H595W vs Hanersun HN18-72HT585W

Hanersun HN18N-72H595W
Hanersun
HN18N-72H595W
595 Wp 23.00 % TOPCon
VS
Hanersun HN18-72HT585W
Hanersun
HN18-72HT585W
585 Wp 22.65 % TOPCon Bifacial
The verdict

HN18N-72H595W leads on the differences that matter

The largest is temperature coefficient: 0.030 %/°C better in heat. 11 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 8 differences
How alike are they
11 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

8 of 19 parameters
Parameter HN18N-72H595W HN18-72HT585W Difference
Temperature coefficient -0.280 %/°C -0.310 %/°C 0.030 %/°C better in heat
Weight 26.0 kg 32.5 kg 6.5 kg lighter
Weight per kWp 43.7 kg/kWp 55.6 kg/kWp 11.9 kg/kWp lighter
Product warranty 25 yrs 15 yrs 10 yrs longer
Module efficiency 23.00 % 22.65 % 0.35 pp more efficient
Power density 230.3 Wp/m² 226.5 Wp/m² 3.9 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 595 Wp 585 Wp 10 W more power
Bifacial No Yes No vs Yes
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
HN18N-72H595W
19,963 kWh
HN18-72HT585W
19,628 kWh
Lifetime gap
335 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario HN18N-72H595W HN18-72HT585W
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 595 W 585 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.3% of rated power 570 W 558 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 90.7% of rated power 545 W 531 W
Hot roof 70 °C 86.0% of rated power 520 W 503 W
03

Full specification

Parameter HN18N-72H595W HN18-72HT585W Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 595 Wp 585 Wp +10 W for HN18N-72H595W
Module efficiency 23.00 % 22.65 % +0.35 pp for HN18N-72H595W
Power density 230.3 Wp/m² 226.5 Wp/m² +3.9 Wp/m² for HN18N-72H595W
Open-circuit voltage 52.00 V 51.60 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 43.80 V 43.40 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 14.41 A 14.30 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 13.59 A 13.49 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.280 %/°C -0.310 %/°C +0.030 %/°C for HN18N-72H595W
Mechanical
Dimensions 2278x1134x30 mm 2278x1134x30 mm Same
Module area 2.583 m² 2.583 m² Same
Weight 26.0 kg 32.5 kg -6.5 kg for HN18N-72H595W
Weight per kWp 43.7 kg/kWp 55.6 kg/kWp -11.9 kg/kWp for HN18N-72H595W
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 25 yrs 15 yrs +10 yrs for HN18N-72H595W
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 144 144 Same
Bifacial No Yes No vs Yes
04

Against the whole database

14,129 panels
Efficiency
#1,970 vs #3,579
HN18N-72H595W leads by 1,609 places
Power density
#1,809 vs #3,557
HN18N-72H595W leads by 1,748 places
Heat behaviour
#1,347 vs #8,069
HN18N-72H595W leads by 6,722 places
Weight
#333 vs #9,992
HN18N-72H595W leads by 9,659 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#1,345 vs #3,577
HN18N-72H595W leads by 2,232 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Hanersun
Hanersun HN18N-72H595W vs Hanersun HN18N-72HT600W
5 differences, the largest is weight
Same series, other bin
Hanersun
Hanersun HN18N-72H595W vs Hanersun HN18N-72HT595W
4 differences, the largest is weight
Same series, other bin
Hanersun
Hanersun HN18N-72H595W vs Hanersun HN18N-72H590W
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Hanersun
Hanersun HN18N-72H595W vs Hanersun HN18N-72HT590W
5 differences, the largest is weight
Same series, other bin
Hanersun
Hanersun HN18N-72H595W vs Hanersun HN18-72H585W
8 differences, the largest is performance warranty
Same series, other bin
Hanersun
Hanersun HN18N-72H595W vs Hanersun HN18N-72H585W
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Hanersun HN18N-72H595W or Hanersun HN18-72HT585W?
According to our database: Hanersun HN18N-72H595 W has higher module efficiency (23.00% vs 22.65%); Hanersun HN18N-72H595 W tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.280%/°C vs -0.310%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Hanersun HN18N-72H595W and Hanersun HN18-72HT585W?
Hanersun HN18N-72H595 W has a module efficiency of 23.00%, while Hanersun HN18-72HT585 W is 22.65%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Hanersun HN18N-72H595W use vs Hanersun HN18-72HT585W?
Hanersun HN18N-72H595 W uses TOPCon cells; Hanersun HN18-72HT585 W uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Hanersun HN18N-72H595W and Hanersun HN18-72HT585W?
Hanersun HN18N-72H595 W has a 30 years power warranty; Hanersun HN18-72HT585 W has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Hanersun HN18N-72H595W and Hanersun HN18-72HT585W bifacial panels?
Hanersun HN18-72HT585 W is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Hanersun HN18N-72H595 W is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.

Shop prices: See 14 Hanersun offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.