Skip to main content
GS12R-T132-GF-615 vs GS12-T132-GF-715 10 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Goldi Solar GS12R-T132-GF-615 vs Goldi Solar GS12-T132-GF-715

Goldi Solar GS12R-T132-GF-615
Goldi Solar
GS12R-T132-GF-615
615 Wp 22.76 % TOPCon Bifacial
VS
Goldi Solar GS12-T132-GF-715
Goldi Solar
GS12-T132-GF-715
715 Wp 23.01 % TOPCon Bifacial
The verdict

GS12-T132-GF-715 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is rated power: 100 W more power. 10 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 9 differences
How alike are they
10 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

9 of 19 parameters
Parameter GS12R-T132-GF-615 GS12-T132-GF-715 Difference
Rated power 615 Wp 715 Wp 100 W more power
Weight 33.7 kg 38.1 kg 4.4 kg lighter
Temperature coefficient -0.300 %/°C -0.280 %/°C 0.020 %/°C better in heat
Short-circuit current 15.89 A 18.28 A 2.39 A apart
Module area 2.701 m² 3.106 m² 0.405 m² apart
Module efficiency 22.76 % 23.01 % 0.25 pp more efficient
Current at max power 15.04 A 17.30 A 2.26 A apart
Open-circuit voltage 49.30 V 48.14 V 1.16 V apart
Dimensions 2382x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm 2382x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
GS12R-T132-GF-615
20,634 kWh
GS12-T132-GF-715
23,990 kWh
Lifetime gap
3,356 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario GS12R-T132-GF-615 GS12-T132-GF-715
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 615 W 715 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.5% of rated power 587 W 685 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.0% of rated power 560 W 655 W
Hot roof 70 °C 86.5% of rated power 532 W 625 W
03

Full specification

Parameter GS12R-T132-GF-615 GS12-T132-GF-715 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 615 Wp 715 Wp +100 W for GS12-T132-GF-715
Module efficiency 22.76 % 23.01 % +0.25 pp for GS12-T132-GF-715
Power density 227.7 Wp/m² 230.2 Wp/m² Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage 49.30 V 48.14 V 1.16 V apart
Voltage at max power 40.90 V 41.32 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 15.89 A 18.28 A 2.39 A apart
Current at max power 15.04 A 17.30 A 2.26 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.300 %/°C -0.280 %/°C +0.020 %/°C for GS12-T132-GF-715
Mechanical
Dimensions 2382x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm 2382x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
Module area 2.701 m² 3.106 m² 0.405 m² apart
Weight 33.7 kg 38.1 kg -4.4 kg for GS12R-T132-GF-615
Weight per kWp 54.8 kg/kWp 53.3 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#3,201 vs #1,911
GS12-T132-GF-715 leads by 1,290 places
Power density
#3,077 vs #2,018
GS12-T132-GF-715 leads by 1,059 places
Heat behaviour
#6,093 vs #1,309
GS12-T132-GF-715 leads by 4,784 places
Weight
#9,202 vs #7,172
GS12-T132-GF-715 leads by 2,030 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#2,968 vs #678
GS12-T132-GF-715 leads by 2,290 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Goldi Solar
Goldi Solar GS12R-T132-GF-615 vs Goldi Solar GS12-T132-GF-710
8 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Goldi Solar
Goldi Solar GS12R-T132-GF-615 vs Goldi Solar GS12-T132-GF-705
8 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Goldi Solar
Goldi Solar GS12R-T132-GF-615 vs Goldi Solar GS12-T132-GF-700
9 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Goldi Solar
Goldi Solar GS12R-T132-GF-615 vs Goldi Solar GS12-T132-GF-695
10 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Goldi Solar
Goldi Solar GS12R-T132-GF-615 vs Goldi Solar GS12-T132-GF-690
10 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Goldi Solar
Goldi Solar GS12R-T132-GF-615 vs Goldi Solar GS12R-T132-GF-620
The same specification on paper
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Goldi Solar GS12R-T132-GF-615 or Goldi Solar GS12-T132-GF-715?
According to our database: Goldi Solar GS12-T132-GF-715 has higher module efficiency (23.01% vs 22.76%); Goldi Solar GS12-T132-GF-715 tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.280%/°C vs -0.300%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Goldi Solar GS12R-T132-GF-615 and Goldi Solar GS12-T132-GF-715?
Goldi Solar GS12R-T132-GF-615 has a module efficiency of 22.76%, while Goldi Solar GS12-T132-GF-715 is 23.01%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Goldi Solar GS12R-T132-GF-615 use vs Goldi Solar GS12-T132-GF-715?
Goldi Solar GS12R-T132-GF-615 uses TOPCon cells; Goldi Solar GS12-T132-GF-715 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Goldi Solar GS12R-T132-GF-615 and Goldi Solar GS12-T132-GF-715?
Goldi Solar GS12R-T132-GF-615 has a 30 years power warranty; Goldi Solar GS12-T132-GF-715 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Goldi Solar GS12R-T132-GF-615 and Goldi Solar GS12-T132-GF-715 bifacial panels?
Both Goldi Solar GS12R-T132-GF-615 and Goldi Solar GS12-T132-GF-715 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.