Skip to main content
GS12-T132-GF-700 vs GS12R-T132-GF-615 10 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Goldi Solar GS12-T132-GF-700 vs Goldi Solar GS12R-T132-GF-615

Goldi Solar GS12-T132-GF-700
Goldi Solar
GS12-T132-GF-700
700 Wp 22.53 % TOPCon Bifacial
VS
Goldi Solar GS12R-T132-GF-615
Goldi Solar
GS12R-T132-GF-615
615 Wp 22.76 % TOPCon Bifacial
The verdict

9 differences, and they point both ways

The largest is rated power: 85 W more power. 10 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 9 differences
How alike are they
10 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

9 of 19 parameters
Parameter GS12-T132-GF-700 GS12R-T132-GF-615 Difference
Rated power 700 Wp 615 Wp 85 W more power
Weight 38.1 kg 33.7 kg 4.4 kg lighter
Temperature coefficient -0.280 %/°C -0.300 %/°C 0.020 %/°C better in heat
Short-circuit current 18.16 A 15.89 A 2.27 A apart
Module area 3.106 m² 2.701 m² 0.405 m² apart
Module efficiency 22.53 % 22.76 % 0.23 pp more efficient
Current at max power 17.14 A 15.04 A 2.10 A apart
Open-circuit voltage 47.60 V 49.30 V 1.70 V apart
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 2382x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm vs 2382x1134x30 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
GS12-T132-GF-700
23,486 kWh
GS12R-T132-GF-615
20,634 kWh
Lifetime gap
2,852 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario GS12-T132-GF-700 GS12R-T132-GF-615
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 700 W 615 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.5% of rated power 671 W 587 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.0% of rated power 641 W 560 W
Hot roof 70 °C 86.5% of rated power 612 W 532 W
03

Full specification

Parameter GS12-T132-GF-700 GS12R-T132-GF-615 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 700 Wp 615 Wp +85 W for GS12-T132-GF-700
Module efficiency 22.53 % 22.76 % +0.23 pp for GS12R-T132-GF-615
Power density 225.3 Wp/m² 227.7 Wp/m² Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage 47.60 V 49.30 V 1.70 V apart
Voltage at max power 40.84 V 40.90 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 18.16 A 15.89 A 2.27 A apart
Current at max power 17.14 A 15.04 A 2.10 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.280 %/°C -0.300 %/°C +0.020 %/°C for GS12-T132-GF-700
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 2382x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm vs 2382x1134x30 mm
Module area 3.106 m² 2.701 m² 0.405 m² apart
Weight 38.1 kg 33.7 kg -4.4 kg for GS12R-T132-GF-615
Weight per kWp 54.4 kg/kWp 54.8 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#3,982 vs #3,201
GS12R-T132-GF-615 leads by 781 places
Power density
#3,989 vs #3,077
GS12R-T132-GF-615 leads by 912 places
Heat behaviour
#1,309 vs #6,093
GS12-T132-GF-700 leads by 4,784 places
Weight
#8,726 vs #9,202
GS12-T132-GF-700 leads by 476 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#1,184 vs #2,968
GS12-T132-GF-700 leads by 1,784 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Goldi Solar
Goldi Solar GS12-T132-GF-700 vs Goldi Solar GS12-T132-GF-715
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Goldi Solar
Goldi Solar GS12-T132-GF-700 vs Goldi Solar GS12-T132-GF-710
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Goldi Solar
Goldi Solar GS12-T132-GF-700 vs Goldi Solar GS12-T132-GF-705
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Goldi Solar
Goldi Solar GS12-T132-GF-700 vs Goldi Solar GS12-T132-GF-695
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Goldi Solar
Goldi Solar GS12-T132-GF-700 vs Goldi Solar GS12-T132-GF-690
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Goldi Solar
Goldi Solar GS12-T132-GF-700 vs Goldi Solar GS12R-T132-GF-620
10 differences, the largest is rated power
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Goldi Solar GS12-T132-GF-700 or Goldi Solar GS12R-T132-GF-615?
According to our database: Goldi Solar GS12R-T132-GF-615 has higher module efficiency (22.76% vs 22.53%); Goldi Solar GS12-T132-GF-700 tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.280%/°C vs -0.300%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Goldi Solar GS12-T132-GF-700 and Goldi Solar GS12R-T132-GF-615?
Goldi Solar GS12-T132-GF-700 has a module efficiency of 22.53%, while Goldi Solar GS12R-T132-GF-615 is 22.76%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Goldi Solar GS12-T132-GF-700 use vs Goldi Solar GS12R-T132-GF-615?
Goldi Solar GS12-T132-GF-700 uses TOPCon cells; Goldi Solar GS12R-T132-GF-615 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Goldi Solar GS12-T132-GF-700 and Goldi Solar GS12R-T132-GF-615?
Goldi Solar GS12-T132-GF-700 has a 30 years power warranty; Goldi Solar GS12R-T132-GF-615 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Goldi Solar GS12-T132-GF-700 and Goldi Solar GS12R-T132-GF-615 bifacial panels?
Both Goldi Solar GS12-T132-GF-700 and Goldi Solar GS12R-T132-GF-615 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.