Goldi Solar GS10-T144-GF-595Wp vs Goldi Solar GS10-M156-WF-580
VS
The verdict
T144-GF-595Wp leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 2.33 pp more efficient. 7 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 12 differencesHow alike are they
7
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
12 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
T144-GF-595Wp
M156-WF-580
Difference
Module efficiency
23.03 %
20.70 %
2.33 pp more efficient
Temperature coefficient
-0.300 %/°C
-0.340 %/°C
0.040 %/°C better in heat
Power density
230.3 Wp/m²
207.7 Wp/m²
22.7 Wp/m² higher
Performance warranty
30 yrs
25 yrs
5 yrs longer
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.55 %/yr
0.15 %/yr slower
Module area
2.583 m²
2.793 m²
0.210 m² apart
Rated power
595 Wp
580 Wp
15 W more power
Cell technology
TOPCon
PERC
TOPCon vs PERC
Cell count
144
156
12 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
No
Yes vs No
Dimensions
2278x1134x30 mm
2465x1133x35 mm
2278x1134x30 mm vs 2465x1133x35 mm
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Polycrystalline
Monocrystalline vs Polycrystalline
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
T144-GF-595Wp
19,963 kWh
M156-WF-580
18,797 kWh
Lifetime gap
1,166 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
T144-GF-595Wp
M156-WF-580
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
595 W
580 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
94.9% of rated power
568 W
550 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
89.8% of rated power
541 W
521 W
Hot roof
70 °C
84.7% of rated power
515 W
491 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
T144-GF-595Wp
M156-WF-580
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
595 Wp
580 Wp
+15 W for T144-GF-595Wp
Module efficiency
23.03 %
20.70 %
+2.33 pp for T144-GF-595Wp
Power density
230.3 Wp/m²
207.7 Wp/m²
+22.7 Wp/m² for T144-GF-595Wp
Open-circuit voltage
53.17 V
53.59 V
Effectively the same
Voltage at max power
45.95 V
44.97 V
Effectively the same
Short-circuit current
13.66 A
13.79 A
Effectively the same
Current at max power
12.95 A
12.90 A
Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.300 %/°C
-0.340 %/°C
+0.040 %/°C for T144-GF-595Wp
Mechanical
Dimensions
2278x1134x30 mm
2465x1133x35 mm
2278x1134x30 mm vs 2465x1133x35 mm
Module area
2.583 m²
2.793 m²
0.210 m² apart
Weight
31.5 kg
31.5 kg
Same
Weight per kWp
52.9 kg/kWp
54.3 kg/kWp
Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
12 yrs
12 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
25 yrs
+5 yrs for T144-GF-595Wp
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.55 %/yr
-0.15 %/yr for T144-GF-595Wp
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
PERC
TOPCon vs PERC
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Polycrystalline
Monocrystalline vs Polycrystalline
Cell count
144
156
12 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
No
Yes vs No
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#1,744
vs
#10,764
T144-GF-595Wp leads by 9,020 places
Power density
#1,758
vs
#10,551
T144-GF-595Wp leads by 8,793 places
Heat behaviour
#6,093
vs
#8,778
T144-GF-595Wp leads by 2,685 places
Weight
#6,657
vs
#8,548
T144-GF-595Wp leads by 1,891 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#9,798
T144-GF-595Wp leads by 9,777 places
Overall
#3,329
vs
#7,701
T144-GF-595Wp leads by 4,372 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Goldi Solar
Goldi Solar GS10-T144-GF-595Wp vs Goldi Solar GS10-M156-WF-600
11 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Goldi Solar
Goldi Solar GS10-T144-GF-595Wp vs Goldi Solar GS10-M156-WF-595
11 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Goldi Solar
Goldi Solar GS10-T144-GF-595Wp vs Goldi Solar GS10-M156-WF-590
11 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Goldi Solar
Goldi Solar GS10-T144-GF-595Wp vs Goldi Solar GS10-T144-GF-590Wp
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Goldi Solar
Goldi Solar GS10-T144-GF-595Wp vs Goldi Solar GS10-M156-WF-585
12 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Goldi Solar
Goldi Solar GS10-T144-GF-595Wp vs Goldi Solar GS10-T144-GF-585Wp
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Goldi Solar GS10-T144-GF-595Wp or Goldi Solar GS10-M156-WF-580?
According to our database: Goldi Solar GS10-T144-GF-595 Wp has higher module efficiency (23.03% vs 20.70%); Goldi Solar GS10-T144-GF-595 Wp tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.300%/°C vs -0.340%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Goldi Solar GS10-T144-GF-595Wp and Goldi Solar GS10-M156-WF-580?
Goldi Solar GS10-T144-GF-595 Wp has a module efficiency of 23.03%, while Goldi Solar GS10-M156-WF-580 is 20.70%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Goldi Solar GS10-T144-GF-595Wp use vs Goldi Solar GS10-M156-WF-580?
Goldi Solar GS10-T144-GF-595 Wp uses TOPCon cells; Goldi Solar GS10-M156-WF-580 uses PERC. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Goldi Solar GS10-T144-GF-595Wp and Goldi Solar GS10-M156-WF-580?
Goldi Solar GS10-T144-GF-595 Wp has a 30 years power warranty; Goldi Solar GS10-M156-WF-580 has a 25 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Goldi Solar GS10-T144-GF-595Wp and Goldi Solar GS10-M156-WF-580 bifacial panels?
Goldi Solar GS10-T144-GF-595 Wp is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Goldi Solar GS10-M156-WF-580 is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.