Skip to main content
GK-4-78HGBD-780M vs TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760 8 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Gokin GK-4-78HGBD-780M vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760

Gokin GK-4-78HGBD-780M
Gokin
GK-4-78HGBD-780M
780 Wp 24.30 % Back Contact Bifacial
VS
Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760
TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760
760 Wp 24.50 % TOPCon Bifacial
The verdict

GK-4-78HGBD-780M leads on the differences that matter

The largest is product warranty: 3 yrs longer. 8 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 11 differences
How alike are they
8 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

11 of 19 parameters
Parameter GK-4-78HGBD-780M TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760 Difference
Product warranty 15 yrs 12 yrs 3 yrs longer
Rated power 780 Wp 760 Wp 20 W more power
Open-circuit voltage 58.92 V 50.90 V 8.02 V apart
Short-circuit current 16.78 A 18.85 A 2.07 A apart
Module area 3.212 m² 3.106 m² 0.106 m² apart
Cell technology Back Contact TOPCon Back Contact vs TOPCon
Module efficiency 24.30 % 24.50 % 0.20 pp more efficient
Voltage at max power 48.97 V 42.90 V 6.07 V apart
Cell count 156 264 108 cells apart
Current at max power 15.93 A 17.72 A 1.79 A apart
Dimensions 2465x1303x33 mm 2384x1303x33 mm 2465x1303x33 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.260 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
GK-4-78HGBD-780M
26,374 kWh
TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760
25,698 kWh
Lifetime gap
676 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario GK-4-78HGBD-780M TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 780 W 760 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 96.1% of rated power 750 W 730 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 92.2% of rated power 719 W 701 W
Hot roof 70 °C 88.3% of rated power 689 W 671 W
03

Full specification

Parameter GK-4-78HGBD-780M TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 780 Wp 760 Wp +20 W for GK-4-78HGBD-780M
Module efficiency 24.30 % 24.50 % +0.20 pp for TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760
Power density 242.8 Wp/m² 244.7 Wp/m² Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage 58.92 V 50.90 V 8.02 V apart
Voltage at max power 48.97 V 42.90 V 6.07 V apart
Short-circuit current 16.78 A 18.85 A 2.07 A apart
Current at max power 15.93 A 17.72 A 1.79 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.260 %/°C -0.260 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2465x1303x33 mm 2384x1303x33 mm 2465x1303x33 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
Module area 3.212 m² 3.106 m² 0.106 m² apart
Weight 38.7 kg 38.3 kg Effectively the same
Weight per kWp 49.6 kg/kWp 50.4 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 15 yrs 12 yrs +3 yrs for GK-4-78HGBD-780M
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.35 %/yr 0.35 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology Back Contact TOPCon Back Contact vs TOPCon
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 156 264 108 cells apart
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#131 vs #74
TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760 leads by 57 places
Power density
#138 vs #86
TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760 leads by 52 places
Heat behaviour
#511 vs #511
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#3,161 vs #3,780
GK-4-78HGBD-780M leads by 619 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#15 vs #66
GK-4-78HGBD-780M leads by 51 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Gokin
Gokin GK-4-78HGBD-780M vs Gokin GK-4-78HGBD-775M
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Gokin
Gokin GK-4-78HGBD-780M vs Gokin GK-4-78HGBD-770M
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Gokin
Gokin GK-4-78HGBD-780M vs Gokin GK-4-78HGBD-765M
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Gokin
Gokin GK-4-78HGBD-780M vs Gokin GK-4-78HGBD-760M
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-755
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Gokin GK-4-78HGBD-780M or Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760?
According to our database: Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760 has higher module efficiency (24.50% vs 24.30%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Gokin GK-4-78HGBD-780M and Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760?
Gokin GK-4-78HGBD-780M has a module efficiency of 24.30%, while Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760 is 24.50%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Gokin GK-4-78HGBD-780M use vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760?
Gokin GK-4-78HGBD-780M uses Back Contact cells; Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Gokin GK-4-78HGBD-780M and Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760?
Gokin GK-4-78HGBD-780M has a 30 years power warranty; Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Gokin GK-4-78HGBD-780M and Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760 bifacial panels?
Both Gokin GK-4-78HGBD-780M and Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Compare Gokin and Trina Solar as manufacturers Portfolio, efficiency, cell technologies and warranty terms

Shop prices: See 7 Gokin offers · See 238 Trina Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.