HY-NT10/72GDF-610W vs 3SHBGH-C#-630 5 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

GL Solar HY-NT10/72GDF-610W vs GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-630

Q: Which panel is better: GL Solar HY-NT10/72GDF-610W or GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-630?

According to our database: GL Solar HY-NT10/72GDF-610W has higher module efficiency (23.60% vs 22.30%); GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-630 tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.260%/°C vs -0.290%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.

Q: What is the efficiency of GL Solar HY-NT10/72GDF-610W and GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-630?

GL Solar HY-NT10/72GDF-610W has a module efficiency of 23.60%, while GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-630 is 22.30%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.

Q: What cell technology does GL Solar HY-NT10/72GDF-610W use vs GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-630?

GL Solar HY-NT10/72GDF-610W uses TOPCon cells; GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-630 uses HJT. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.

Q: What is the warranty on GL Solar HY-NT10/72GDF-610W and GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-630?

GL Solar HY-NT10/72GDF-610W has a 30 years power warranty; GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-630 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.

Q: Are GL Solar HY-NT10/72GDF-610W and GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-630 bifacial panels?

Both GL Solar HY-NT10/72GDF-610W and GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-630 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

GL Solar

HY-NT10/72GDF-610W

610 Wp 23.60 % TOPCon Bifacial

Open panel page Datasheet PDF

GL Solar

3SHBGH-C#-630

630 Wp 22.30 % HJT Bifacial

Open panel page Datasheet PDF

The verdict

HY-NT10/72GDF-610W leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 1.30 pp more efficient. 5 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 14 differences

How alike are they

5 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical

identical differs

What actually differs

14 of 19 parameters

Parameter HY-NT10/72GDF-610W 3SHBGH-C#-630 Difference

Module efficiency 23.60 % 22.30 % 1.30 pp more efficient

Power density 236.1 Wp/m² 222.6 Wp/m² 13.5 Wp/m² higher

Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.260 %/°C 0.030 %/°C better in heat

Weight 32.1 kg 36.0 kg 3.9 kg lighter

Rated power 610 Wp 630 Wp 20 W more power

Open-circuit voltage 52.95 V 45.60 V 7.35 V apart

Short-circuit current 14.37 A 17.48 A 3.11 A apart

Module area 2.583 m² 2.830 m² 0.247 m² apart

Weight per kWp 52.6 kg/kWp 57.1 kg/kWp 4.5 kg/kWp lighter

Cell technology TOPCon HJT TOPCon vs HJT

Voltage at max power 44.94 V 38.52 V 6.42 V apart

Current at max power 13.58 A 16.36 A 2.78 A apart

Cell count 144 120 24 cells apart

Dimensions 2278x1134x30 mm 2172x1303x35 mm 2278x1134x30 mm vs 2172x1303x35 mm

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production

Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year

Cell temperature

HY-NT10/72GDF-610W

20,467 kWh

3SHBGH-C#-630

20,911 kWh

Lifetime gap

444 kWh

Output when it is hot

Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees

Scenario HY-NT10/72GDF-610W 3SHBGH-C#-630

Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 610 W 630 W

Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 583 W 605 W

Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 557 W 581 W

Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 530 W 556 W

Full specification

Parameter HY-NT10/72GDF-610W 3SHBGH-C#-630 Difference

Power and efficiency

Rated power 610 Wp 630 Wp +20 W for 3SHBGH-C#-630

Module efficiency 23.60 % 22.30 % +1.30 pp for HY-NT10/72GDF-610W

Power density 236.1 Wp/m² 222.6 Wp/m² +13.5 Wp/m² for HY-NT10/72GDF-610W

Open-circuit voltage 52.95 V 45.60 V 7.35 V apart

Voltage at max power 44.94 V 38.52 V 6.42 V apart

Short-circuit current 14.37 A 17.48 A 3.11 A apart

Current at max power 13.58 A 16.36 A 2.78 A apart

Temperature

Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.260 %/°C +0.030 %/°C for 3SHBGH-C#-630

Mechanical

Dimensions 2278x1134x30 mm 2172x1303x35 mm 2278x1134x30 mm vs 2172x1303x35 mm

Module area 2.583 m² 2.830 m² 0.247 m² apart

Weight 32.1 kg 36.0 kg -3.9 kg for HY-NT10/72GDF-610W

Weight per kWp 52.6 kg/kWp 57.1 kg/kWp -4.5 kg/kWp for HY-NT10/72GDF-610W

Warranty and degradation

Product warranty 15 yrs 15 yrs Same

Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same

Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same

Technology

Cell technology TOPCon HJT TOPCon vs HJT

Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same

Cell count 144 120 24 cells apart

Bifacial Yes Yes Same

Against the whole database

14,005 panels

Efficiency

#627 vs #5,100

HY-NT10/72GDF-610W leads by 4,473 places

Power density

#623 vs #5,501

HY-NT10/72GDF-610W leads by 4,878 places

Heat behaviour

#2,165 vs #511

3SHBGH-C#-630 leads by 1,654 places

Weight

#6,249 vs #11,083

HY-NT10/72GDF-610W leads by 4,834 places

Warranty

#21 vs #21

Tied - the same position in the database

Overall

#1,815 vs #2,426

HY-NT10/72GDF-610W leads by 611 places

More useful comparisons

Open the full database

Same series, other bin

GL Solar

GL Solar HY-NT10/72GDF-610W vs GL Solar HY-NT10/72GDF-605W

One difference: module efficiency

Same series, other bin

GL Solar

GL Solar HY-NT10/72GDF-610W vs GL Solar HY-NT10/72GDF-600W

3 differences, the largest is module efficiency

Same series, other bin

GL Solar

GL Solar HY-NT10/72GDF-610W vs GL Solar HY-NT10/72GDF-595W

3 differences, the largest is module efficiency

Same series, other bin

GL Solar

GL Solar HY-NT10/72GDF-610W vs GL Solar HY-NT10/72GDF-590W

3 differences, the largest is module efficiency

Same series, other bin

GL Solar

GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-630 vs GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-640

3 differences, the largest is module efficiency

Same series, other bin

GL Solar

GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-630 vs GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-635

The same specification on paper

Written summary

Checking cache...

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: GL Solar HY-NT10/72GDF-610W or GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-630?

According to our database: GL Solar HY-NT10/72GDF-610 W has higher module efficiency (23.60% vs 22.30%); GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-630 tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.260%/°C vs -0.290%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.

What is the efficiency of GL Solar HY-NT10/72GDF-610W and GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-630?

GL Solar HY-NT10/72GDF-610 W has a module efficiency of 23.60%, while GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-630 is 22.30%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.

What cell technology does GL Solar HY-NT10/72GDF-610W use vs GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-630?

GL Solar HY-NT10/72GDF-610 W uses TOPCon cells; GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-630 uses HJT. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.

What is the warranty on GL Solar HY-NT10/72GDF-610W and GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-630?

GL Solar HY-NT10/72GDF-610 W has a 30 years power warranty; GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-630 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.

Are GL Solar HY-NT10/72GDF-610W and GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-630 bifacial panels?

Both GL Solar HY-NT10/72GDF-610 W and GL Solar 3SHBGH-C#-630 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 2 GL Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.