Solitek SOLID Framed Transparent 505 vs Solitek Forza 650
VS
The verdict
Forza 650 leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 0.66 pp more efficient. 7 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 12 differencesHow alike are they
7
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
12 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
SOLID Framed Transparent 505
Forza 650
Difference
Module efficiency
22.31 %
22.97 %
0.66 pp more efficient
Rated power
505 Wp
650 Wp
145 W more power
Weight
29.0 kg
34.2 kg
5.2 kg lighter
Product warranty
30 yrs
25 yrs
5 yrs longer
Power density
223.1 Wp/m²
229.7 Wp/m²
6.6 Wp/m² higher
Short-circuit current
14.25 A
18.48 A
4.23 A apart
Module area
2.263 m²
2.830 m²
0.567 m² apart
Weight per kWp
57.4 kg/kWp
52.6 kg/kWp
4.8 kg/kWp lighter
Annual degradation
0.31 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
0.09 %/yr slower
Open-circuit voltage
42.28 V
44.28 V
2.00 V apart
Current at max power
13.85 A
17.43 A
3.58 A apart
Dimensions
1996x1134x30 mm
2172x1303x30 mm
1996x1134x30 mm vs 2172x1303x30 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.300 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
SOLID Framed Transparent 505
17,181 kWh
Forza 650
21,809 kWh
Lifetime gap
4,628 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
SOLID Framed Transparent 505
Forza 650
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
505 W
650 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.5% of rated power
482 W
621 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.0% of rated power
460 W
592 W
Hot roof
70 °C
86.5% of rated power
437 W
562 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
SOLID Framed Transparent 505
Forza 650
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
505 Wp
650 Wp
+145 W for Forza 650
Module efficiency
22.31 %
22.97 %
+0.66 pp for Forza 650
Power density
223.1 Wp/m²
229.7 Wp/m²
+6.6 Wp/m² for Forza 650
Open-circuit voltage
42.28 V
44.28 V
2.00 V apart
Voltage at max power
36.47 V
37.30 V
Effectively the same
Short-circuit current
14.25 A
18.48 A
4.23 A apart
Current at max power
13.85 A
17.43 A
3.58 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.300 %/°C
-0.300 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
1996x1134x30 mm
2172x1303x30 mm
1996x1134x30 mm vs 2172x1303x30 mm
Module area
2.263 m²
2.830 m²
0.567 m² apart
Weight
29.0 kg
34.2 kg
-5.2 kg for SOLID Framed Transparent 505
Weight per kWp
57.4 kg/kWp
52.6 kg/kWp
-4.8 kg/kWp for Forza 650
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
30 yrs
25 yrs
+5 yrs for SOLID Framed Transparent 505
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.31 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
-0.09 %/yr for SOLID Framed Transparent 505
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
TOPCon
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
120
120
Same
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#5,082
vs
#2,237
Forza 650 leads by 2,845 places
Power density
#5,068
vs
#2,160
Forza 650 leads by 2,908 places
Heat behaviour
#6,093
vs
#6,093
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#11,209
vs
#6,240
Forza 650 leads by 4,969 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#3,634
vs
#551
Forza 650 leads by 3,083 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Solitek
Solitek Forza 650 vs Solitek Forza 720
8 differences, the largest is rated power
Same manufacturer
Solitek
Solitek SOLID Framed Transparent 505 vs Solitek SOLID Framed White 720W
14 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Solitek
Solitek SOLID Framed Transparent 505 vs Solitek SOLID Framed White 650W
12 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Solitek
Solitek SOLID Framed Transparent 505 vs Solitek Magnus 510
9 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Solitek
Solitek SOLID Framed Transparent 505 vs Solitek SOLRIF D Black 455
12 differences, the largest is rated power
Same manufacturer
Solitek
Solitek SOLID Framed Transparent 505 vs Solitek SOLID Semi-Clear Framed 455 W
12 differences, the largest is rated power
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Solitek SOLID Framed Transparent 505 or Solitek Forza 650?
According to our database: Solitek Forza 650 has higher module efficiency (22.97% vs 22.31%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Solitek SOLID Framed Transparent 505 and Solitek Forza 650?
Solitek SOLID Framed Transparent 505 has a module efficiency of 22.31%, while Solitek Forza 650 is 22.97%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Solitek SOLID Framed Transparent 505 use vs Solitek Forza 650?
Solitek SOLID Framed Transparent 505 uses TOPCon cells; Solitek Forza 650 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Solitek SOLID Framed Transparent 505 and Solitek Forza 650?
Solitek SOLID Framed Transparent 505 has a 30 years power warranty; Solitek Forza 650 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Solitek SOLID Framed Transparent 505 and Solitek Forza 650 bifacial panels?
Both Solitek SOLID Framed Transparent 505 and Solitek Forza 650 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 20 Solitek offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.