Skip to main content
ES65HCBT144-T vs E715HCBG 132-T 7 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Emmvee ES65HCBT144-T vs Emmvee E715HCBG 132-T

Emmvee
ES65HCBT144-T
565 Wp 21.87 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
Emmvee
E715HCBG 132-T
715 Wp 23.02 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

E715HCBG 132-T leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 1.15 pp more efficient. 7 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 12 differences
How alike are they
7 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

12 of 19 parameters
Parameter ES65HCBT144-T E715HCBG 132-T Difference
Module efficiency 21.87 % 23.02 % 1.15 pp more efficient
Rated power 565 Wp 715 Wp 150 W more power
Power density 218.7 Wp/m² 230.2 Wp/m² 11.5 Wp/m² higher
Weight 27.1 kg 37.8 kg 10.7 kg lighter
Short-circuit current 14.19 A 18.54 A 4.35 A apart
Module area 2.583 m² 3.106 m² 0.523 m² apart
Weight per kWp 48.0 kg/kWp 52.9 kg/kWp 4.9 kg/kWp lighter
Open-circuit voltage 50.87 V 48.46 V 2.41 V apart
Current at max power 13.41 A 17.77 A 4.36 A apart
Cell count 144 132 12 cells apart
Dimensions 2278x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm 2278x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
Voltage at max power 42.14 V 40.25 V 1.89 V apart
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
ES65HCBT144-T
18,957 kWh
E715HCBG 132-T
23,990 kWh
Lifetime gap
5,033 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario ES65HCBT144-T E715HCBG 132-T
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 565 W 715 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 540 W 684 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 516 W 653 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 491 W 622 W
03

Full specification

Parameter ES65HCBT144-T E715HCBG 132-T Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 565 Wp 715 Wp +150 W for E715HCBG 132-T
Module efficiency 21.87 % 23.02 % +1.15 pp for E715HCBG 132-T
Power density 218.7 Wp/m² 230.2 Wp/m² +11.5 Wp/m² for E715HCBG 132-T
Open-circuit voltage 50.87 V 48.46 V 2.41 V apart
Voltage at max power 42.14 V 40.25 V 1.89 V apart
Short-circuit current 14.19 A 18.54 A 4.35 A apart
Current at max power 13.41 A 17.77 A 4.36 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2278x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm 2278x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
Module area 2.583 m² 3.106 m² 0.523 m² apart
Weight 27.1 kg 37.8 kg -10.7 kg for ES65HCBT144-T
Weight per kWp 48.0 kg/kWp 52.9 kg/kWp -4.9 kg/kWp for ES65HCBT144-T
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 144 132 12 cells apart
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#6,908 vs #1,797
E715HCBG 132-T leads by 5,111 places
Power density
#6,841 vs #2,018
E715HCBG 132-T leads by 4,823 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165 vs #2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#2,000 vs #6,576
ES65HCBT144-T leads by 4,576 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#5,570 vs #678
E715HCBG 132-T leads by 4,892 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Emmvee
Emmvee ES65HCBT144-T vs Emmvee ES80HCBT144-T
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Emmvee
Emmvee ES65HCBT144-T vs Emmvee ES75HCBT144-T
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Emmvee
Emmvee ES65HCBT144-T vs Emmvee ES70HCBT144-T
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Emmvee
Emmvee ES65HCBT144-T vs Emmvee ES60HCBT144-T
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Emmvee
Emmvee E715HCBG 132-T vs Emmvee E720HCBG 132-T
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Emmvee
Emmvee E715HCBG 132-T vs Emmvee E720HCBG132-T
The same specification on paper
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Emmvee ES65HCBT144-T or Emmvee E715HCBG 132-T?
According to our database: Emmvee E715HCBG 132-T has higher module efficiency (23.02% vs 21.87%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Emmvee ES65HCBT144-T and Emmvee E715HCBG 132-T?
Emmvee ES65HCBT144-T has a module efficiency of 21.87%, while Emmvee E715HCBG 132-T is 23.02%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Emmvee ES65HCBT144-T use vs Emmvee E715HCBG 132-T?
Emmvee ES65HCBT144-T uses TOPCon cells; Emmvee E715HCBG 132-T uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Emmvee ES65HCBT144-T and Emmvee E715HCBG 132-T?
Emmvee ES65HCBT144-T has a 30 years power warranty; Emmvee E715HCBG 132-T has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Emmvee ES65HCBT144-T and Emmvee E715HCBG 132-T bifacial panels?
Both Emmvee ES65HCBT144-T and Emmvee E715HCBG 132-T are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.