Skip to main content
E720HCBG 132-T vs ASM-M12-132-650 8 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Emmvee E720HCBG 132-T vs Adani Solar ASM-M12-132-650

Emmvee
E720HCBG 132-T
720 Wp 23.18 % TOPCon Bifacial
VS
Adani Solar
ASM-M12-132-650
650 Wp 20.87 % PERC
The verdict

E720HCBG 132-T leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 2.31 pp more efficient. 8 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 11 differences
How alike are they
8 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

11 of 19 parameters
Parameter E720HCBG 132-T ASM-M12-132-650 Difference
Module efficiency 23.18 % 20.87 % 2.31 pp more efficient
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.340 %/°C 0.050 %/°C better in heat
Rated power 720 Wp 650 Wp 70 W more power
Power density 231.8 Wp/m² 208.7 Wp/m² 23.1 Wp/m² higher
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.55 %/yr 0.15 %/yr slower
Weight 37.8 kg 33.6 kg 4.2 kg lighter
Open-circuit voltage 48.60 V 43.66 V 4.94 V apart
Cell technology TOPCon PERC TOPCon vs PERC
Voltage at max power 40.36 V 37.32 V 3.04 V apart
Bifacial Yes No Yes vs No
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 2390x1303x35 mm 2384x1303x33 mm vs 2390x1303x35 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
E720HCBG 132-T
24,157 kWh
ASM-M12-132-650
21,066 kWh
Lifetime gap
3,091 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario E720HCBG 132-T ASM-M12-132-650
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 720 W 650 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 94.9% of rated power 689 W 617 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 89.8% of rated power 657 W 584 W
Hot roof 70 °C 84.7% of rated power 626 W 551 W
03

Full specification

Parameter E720HCBG 132-T ASM-M12-132-650 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 720 Wp 650 Wp +70 W for E720HCBG 132-T
Module efficiency 23.18 % 20.87 % +2.31 pp for E720HCBG 132-T
Power density 231.8 Wp/m² 208.7 Wp/m² +23.1 Wp/m² for E720HCBG 132-T
Open-circuit voltage 48.60 V 43.66 V 4.94 V apart
Voltage at max power 40.36 V 37.32 V 3.04 V apart
Short-circuit current 18.56 A 18.85 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 17.85 A 17.44 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.340 %/°C +0.050 %/°C for E720HCBG 132-T
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 2390x1303x35 mm 2384x1303x33 mm vs 2390x1303x35 mm
Module area 3.106 m² 3.114 m² Effectively the same
Weight 37.8 kg 33.6 kg -4.2 kg for ASM-M12-132-650
Weight per kWp 52.5 kg/kWp 51.7 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.55 %/yr -0.15 %/yr for E720HCBG 132-T
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon PERC TOPCon vs PERC
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial Yes No Yes vs No
04

Against the whole database

14,129 panels
Efficiency
#1,468 vs #10,407
E720HCBG 132-T leads by 8,939 places
Power density
#1,390 vs #10,373
E720HCBG 132-T leads by 8,983 places
Heat behaviour
#2,220 vs #8,846
E720HCBG 132-T leads by 6,626 places
Weight
#6,090 vs #5,104
ASM-M12-132-650 leads by 986 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#550 vs #3,974
E720HCBG 132-T leads by 3,424 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Emmvee
Emmvee E720HCBG 132-T vs Emmvee E720HCBG132-T
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Emmvee
Emmvee E720HCBG 132-T vs Emmvee E715HCBG 132-T
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Emmvee
Emmvee E720HCBG 132-T vs Emmvee E715HCBG132-T
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Emmvee
Emmvee E720HCBG 132-T vs Emmvee E710HCBG 132-T
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Emmvee
Emmvee E720HCBG 132-T vs Emmvee E710HCBG132-T
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Emmvee
Emmvee E720HCBG 132-T vs Emmvee E705HCBG 132-T
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Emmvee E720HCBG 132-T or Adani Solar ASM-M12-132-650?
According to our database: Emmvee E720HCBG 132-T has higher module efficiency (23.18% vs 20.87%); Emmvee E720HCBG 132-T tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.290%/°C vs -0.340%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Emmvee E720HCBG 132-T and Adani Solar ASM-M12-132-650?
Emmvee E720HCBG 132-T has a module efficiency of 23.18%, while Adani Solar ASM-M12-132-650 is 20.87%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Emmvee E720HCBG 132-T use vs Adani Solar ASM-M12-132-650?
Emmvee E720HCBG 132-T uses TOPCon cells; Adani Solar ASM-M12-132-650 uses PERC. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Emmvee E720HCBG 132-T and Adani Solar ASM-M12-132-650?
Emmvee E720HCBG 132-T has a 30 years power warranty; Adani Solar ASM-M12-132-650 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Emmvee E720HCBG 132-T and Adani Solar ASM-M12-132-650 bifacial panels?
Emmvee E720HCBG 132-T is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Adani Solar ASM-M12-132-650 is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.
Compare Emmvee and Adani Solar as manufacturers Portfolio, efficiency, cell technologies and warranty terms

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.