Adani Solar ASM-M12-132-650 vs Emmvee E720HCBG 132-T
VS
The verdict
E720HCBG 132-T leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 2.31 pp more efficient. 8 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 11 differencesHow alike are they
8
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
11 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
ASM-M12-132-650
E720HCBG 132-T
Difference
Module efficiency
20.87 %
23.18 %
2.31 pp more efficient
Temperature coefficient
-0.340 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
0.050 %/°C better in heat
Rated power
650 Wp
720 Wp
70 W more power
Power density
208.7 Wp/m²
231.8 Wp/m²
23.1 Wp/m² higher
Annual degradation
0.55 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
0.15 %/yr slower
Weight
33.6 kg
37.8 kg
4.2 kg lighter
Open-circuit voltage
43.66 V
48.60 V
4.94 V apart
Cell technology
PERC
TOPCon
PERC vs TOPCon
Voltage at max power
37.32 V
40.36 V
3.04 V apart
Bifacial
No
Yes
No vs Yes
Dimensions
2390x1303x35 mm
2384x1303x33 mm
2390x1303x35 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
ASM-M12-132-650
21,066 kWh
E720HCBG 132-T
24,157 kWh
Lifetime gap
3,091 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
ASM-M12-132-650
E720HCBG 132-T
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
650 W
720 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
94.9% of rated power
617 W
689 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
89.8% of rated power
584 W
657 W
Hot roof
70 °C
84.7% of rated power
551 W
626 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
ASM-M12-132-650
E720HCBG 132-T
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
650 Wp
720 Wp
+70 W for E720HCBG 132-T
Module efficiency
20.87 %
23.18 %
+2.31 pp for E720HCBG 132-T
Power density
208.7 Wp/m²
231.8 Wp/m²
+23.1 Wp/m² for E720HCBG 132-T
Open-circuit voltage
43.66 V
48.60 V
4.94 V apart
Voltage at max power
37.32 V
40.36 V
3.04 V apart
Short-circuit current
18.85 A
18.56 A
Effectively the same
Current at max power
17.44 A
17.85 A
Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.340 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
+0.050 %/°C for E720HCBG 132-T
Mechanical
Dimensions
2390x1303x35 mm
2384x1303x33 mm
2390x1303x35 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
Module area
3.114 m²
3.106 m²
Effectively the same
Weight
33.6 kg
37.8 kg
-4.2 kg for ASM-M12-132-650
Weight per kWp
51.7 kg/kWp
52.5 kg/kWp
Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
12 yrs
12 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.55 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
-0.15 %/yr for E720HCBG 132-T
Technology
Cell technology
PERC
TOPCon
PERC vs TOPCon
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
132
132
Same
Bifacial
No
Yes
No vs Yes
04
14,129 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#10,407
vs
#1,468
E720HCBG 132-T leads by 8,939 places
Power density
#10,373
vs
#1,390
E720HCBG 132-T leads by 8,983 places
Heat behaviour
#8,846
vs
#2,220
E720HCBG 132-T leads by 6,626 places
Weight
#5,104
vs
#6,090
ASM-M12-132-650 leads by 986 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#3,974
vs
#550
E720HCBG 132-T leads by 3,424 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Adani Solar
Adani Solar ASM-M12-132-650 vs Adani Solar ASM-M12-132-645
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Adani Solar
Adani Solar ASM-M12-132-650 vs Adani Solar ASM-M12-132-640
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Adani Solar
Adani Solar ASM-M12-132-650 vs Adani Solar ASM-M12-132-635
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Adani Solar
Adani Solar ASM-M12-132-650 vs Adani Solar ASM-M12-132-630
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Emmvee
Emmvee E720HCBG 132-T vs Emmvee E720HCBG132-T
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Emmvee
Emmvee E720HCBG 132-T vs Emmvee E715HCBG 132-T
The same specification on paper
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Adani Solar ASM-M12-132-650 or Emmvee E720HCBG 132-T?
According to our database: Emmvee E720HCBG 132-T has higher module efficiency (23.18% vs 20.87%); Emmvee E720HCBG 132-T tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.290%/°C vs -0.340%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Adani Solar ASM-M12-132-650 and Emmvee E720HCBG 132-T?
Adani Solar ASM-M12-132-650 has a module efficiency of 20.87%, while Emmvee E720HCBG 132-T is 23.18%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Adani Solar ASM-M12-132-650 use vs Emmvee E720HCBG 132-T?
Adani Solar ASM-M12-132-650 uses PERC cells; Emmvee E720HCBG 132-T uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Adani Solar ASM-M12-132-650 and Emmvee E720HCBG 132-T?
Adani Solar ASM-M12-132-650 has a 30 years power warranty; Emmvee E720HCBG 132-T has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Adani Solar ASM-M12-132-650 and Emmvee E720HCBG 132-T bifacial panels?
Emmvee E720HCBG 132-T is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Adani Solar ASM-M12-132-650 is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.