Skip to main content
E710HCBG132-T vs E610HCBG132-T 11 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Emmvee E710HCBG132-T vs Emmvee E610HCBG132-T

Emmvee
E710HCBG132-T
710 Wp 22.86 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
Emmvee
E610HCBG132-T
610 Wp 22.58 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

E710HCBG132-T leads on the differences that matter

The largest is rated power: 100 W more power. 11 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 8 differences
How alike are they
11 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

8 of 19 parameters
Parameter E710HCBG132-T E610HCBG132-T Difference
Rated power 710 Wp 610 Wp 100 W more power
Weight 37.8 kg 34.0 kg 3.8 kg lighter
Short-circuit current 18.52 A 15.89 A 2.63 A apart
Module area 3.106 m² 2.701 m² 0.405 m² apart
Module efficiency 22.86 % 22.58 % 0.28 pp more efficient
Current at max power 17.70 A 15.05 A 2.65 A apart
Weight per kWp 53.2 kg/kWp 55.7 kg/kWp 2.5 kg/kWp lighter
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 2382x1134x35 mm 2384x1303x33 mm vs 2382x1134x35 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
E710HCBG132-T
23,822 kWh
E610HCBG132-T
20,467 kWh
Lifetime gap
3,355 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario E710HCBG132-T E610HCBG132-T
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 710 W 610 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 679 W 583 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 648 W 557 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 617 W 530 W
03

Full specification

Parameter E710HCBG132-T E610HCBG132-T Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 710 Wp 610 Wp +100 W for E710HCBG132-T
Module efficiency 22.86 % 22.58 % +0.28 pp for E710HCBG132-T
Power density 228.6 Wp/m² 225.8 Wp/m² Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage 48.32 V 48.88 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 40.13 V 40.59 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 18.52 A 15.89 A 2.63 A apart
Current at max power 17.70 A 15.05 A 2.65 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 2382x1134x35 mm 2384x1303x33 mm vs 2382x1134x35 mm
Module area 3.106 m² 2.701 m² 0.405 m² apart
Weight 37.8 kg 34.0 kg -3.8 kg for E610HCBG132-T
Weight per kWp 53.2 kg/kWp 55.7 kg/kWp -2.5 kg/kWp for E710HCBG132-T
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#2,536 vs #3,828
E710HCBG132-T leads by 1,292 places
Power density
#2,474 vs #3,729
E710HCBG132-T leads by 1,255 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165 vs #2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#7,077 vs #10,132
E710HCBG132-T leads by 3,055 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#855 vs #3,346
E710HCBG132-T leads by 2,491 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Emmvee
Emmvee E710HCBG132-T vs Emmvee E720HCBG 132-T
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Emmvee
Emmvee E710HCBG132-T vs Emmvee E720HCBG132-T
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Emmvee
Emmvee E710HCBG132-T vs Emmvee E715HCBG 132-T
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Emmvee
Emmvee E710HCBG132-T vs Emmvee E715HCBG132-T
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Emmvee
Emmvee E710HCBG132-T vs Emmvee E710HCBG 132-T
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Emmvee
Emmvee E710HCBG132-T vs Emmvee E705HCBG 132-T
The same specification on paper
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Emmvee E710HCBG132-T or Emmvee E610HCBG132-T?
According to our database: Emmvee E710HCBG132-T has higher module efficiency (22.86% vs 22.58%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Emmvee E710HCBG132-T and Emmvee E610HCBG132-T?
Emmvee E710HCBG132-T has a module efficiency of 22.86%, while Emmvee E610HCBG132-T is 22.58%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Emmvee E710HCBG132-T use vs Emmvee E610HCBG132-T?
Emmvee E710HCBG132-T uses TOPCon cells; Emmvee E610HCBG132-T uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Emmvee E710HCBG132-T and Emmvee E610HCBG132-T?
Emmvee E710HCBG132-T has a 30 years power warranty; Emmvee E610HCBG132-T has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Emmvee E710HCBG132-T and Emmvee E610HCBG132-T bifacial panels?
Both Emmvee E710HCBG132-T and Emmvee E610HCBG132-T are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.