Skip to main content
E710HCBG 132-T vs E625HCBG132-T 12 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Emmvee E710HCBG 132-T vs Emmvee E625HCBG132-T

Emmvee
E710HCBG 132-T
710 Wp 22.86 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
Emmvee
E625HCBG132-T
625 Wp 23.14 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

7 differences, and they point both ways

The largest is rated power: 85 W more power. 12 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 7 differences
How alike are they
12 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

7 of 19 parameters
Parameter E710HCBG 132-T E625HCBG132-T Difference
Rated power 710 Wp 625 Wp 85 W more power
Weight 37.8 kg 34.0 kg 3.8 kg lighter
Short-circuit current 18.52 A 16.11 A 2.41 A apart
Module area 3.106 m² 2.701 m² 0.405 m² apart
Module efficiency 22.86 % 23.14 % 0.28 pp more efficient
Current at max power 17.70 A 15.27 A 2.43 A apart
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 2382x1134x35 mm 2384x1303x33 mm vs 2382x1134x35 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
E710HCBG 132-T
23,822 kWh
E625HCBG132-T
20,970 kWh
Lifetime gap
2,852 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario E710HCBG 132-T E625HCBG132-T
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 710 W 625 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 679 W 598 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 648 W 571 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 617 W 543 W
03

Full specification

Parameter E710HCBG 132-T E625HCBG132-T Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 710 Wp 625 Wp +85 W for E710HCBG 132-T
Module efficiency 22.86 % 23.14 % +0.28 pp for E625HCBG132-T
Power density 228.6 Wp/m² 231.4 Wp/m² Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage 48.32 V 49.30 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 40.13 V 40.95 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 18.52 A 16.11 A 2.41 A apart
Current at max power 17.70 A 15.27 A 2.43 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 2382x1134x35 mm 2384x1303x33 mm vs 2382x1134x35 mm
Module area 3.106 m² 2.701 m² 0.405 m² apart
Weight 37.8 kg 34.0 kg -3.8 kg for E625HCBG132-T
Weight per kWp 53.2 kg/kWp 54.4 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,129 panels
Efficiency
#2,591 vs #1,554
E625HCBG132-T leads by 1,037 places
Power density
#2,529 vs #1,558
E625HCBG132-T leads by 971 places
Heat behaviour
#2,220 vs #2,220
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#7,142 vs #8,784
E710HCBG 132-T leads by 1,642 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#869 vs #2,287
E710HCBG 132-T leads by 1,418 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Emmvee
Emmvee E710HCBG 132-T vs Emmvee E720HCBG 132-T
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Emmvee
Emmvee E710HCBG 132-T vs Emmvee E720HCBG132-T
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Emmvee
Emmvee E710HCBG 132-T vs Emmvee E715HCBG 132-T
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Emmvee
Emmvee E710HCBG 132-T vs Emmvee E715HCBG132-T
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Emmvee
Emmvee E710HCBG 132-T vs Emmvee E710HCBG132-T
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Emmvee
Emmvee E710HCBG 132-T vs Emmvee E705HCBG 132-T
The same specification on paper
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Emmvee E710HCBG 132-T or Emmvee E625HCBG132-T?
According to our database: Emmvee E625HCBG132-T has higher module efficiency (23.14% vs 22.86%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Emmvee E710HCBG 132-T and Emmvee E625HCBG132-T?
Emmvee E710HCBG 132-T has a module efficiency of 22.86%, while Emmvee E625HCBG132-T is 23.14%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Emmvee E710HCBG 132-T use vs Emmvee E625HCBG132-T?
Emmvee E710HCBG 132-T uses TOPCon cells; Emmvee E625HCBG132-T uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Emmvee E710HCBG 132-T and Emmvee E625HCBG132-T?
Emmvee E710HCBG 132-T has a 30 years power warranty; Emmvee E625HCBG132-T has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Emmvee E710HCBG 132-T and Emmvee E625HCBG132-T bifacial panels?
Both Emmvee E710HCBG 132-T and Emmvee E625HCBG132-T are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.