Emmvee E625HCBG132-T vs Emmvee E710HCBG 132-T
VS
The verdict
7 differences, and they point both ways
The largest is rated power: 85 W more power. 12 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 7 differencesHow alike are they
12
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
7 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
E625HCBG132-T
E710HCBG 132-T
Difference
Rated power
625 Wp
710 Wp
85 W more power
Weight
34.0 kg
37.8 kg
3.8 kg lighter
Short-circuit current
16.11 A
18.52 A
2.41 A apart
Module area
2.701 m²
3.106 m²
0.405 m² apart
Module efficiency
23.14 %
22.86 %
0.28 pp more efficient
Current at max power
15.27 A
17.70 A
2.43 A apart
Dimensions
2382x1134x35 mm
2384x1303x33 mm
2382x1134x35 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
E625HCBG132-T
20,970 kWh
E710HCBG 132-T
23,822 kWh
Lifetime gap
2,852 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
E625HCBG132-T
E710HCBG 132-T
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
625 W
710 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.7% of rated power
598 W
679 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.3% of rated power
571 W
648 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.0% of rated power
543 W
617 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
E625HCBG132-T
E710HCBG 132-T
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
625 Wp
710 Wp
+85 W for E710HCBG 132-T
Module efficiency
23.14 %
22.86 %
+0.28 pp for E625HCBG132-T
Power density
231.4 Wp/m²
228.6 Wp/m²
Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage
49.30 V
48.32 V
Effectively the same
Voltage at max power
40.95 V
40.13 V
Effectively the same
Short-circuit current
16.11 A
18.52 A
2.41 A apart
Current at max power
15.27 A
17.70 A
2.43 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
2382x1134x35 mm
2384x1303x33 mm
2382x1134x35 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
Module area
2.701 m²
3.106 m²
0.405 m² apart
Weight
34.0 kg
37.8 kg
-3.8 kg for E625HCBG132-T
Weight per kWp
54.4 kg/kWp
53.2 kg/kWp
Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
12 yrs
12 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
TOPCon
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
132
132
Same
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,129 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#1,554
vs
#2,591
E625HCBG132-T leads by 1,037 places
Power density
#1,558
vs
#2,529
E625HCBG132-T leads by 971 places
Heat behaviour
#2,220
vs
#2,220
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#8,784
vs
#7,142
E710HCBG 132-T leads by 1,642 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#2,287
vs
#869
E710HCBG 132-T leads by 1,418 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Emmvee
Emmvee E625HCBG132-T vs Emmvee E720HCBG 132-T
6 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Emmvee
Emmvee E625HCBG132-T vs Emmvee E720HCBG132-T
6 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Emmvee
Emmvee E625HCBG132-T vs Emmvee E715HCBG 132-T
6 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Emmvee
Emmvee E625HCBG132-T vs Emmvee E715HCBG132-T
6 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Emmvee
Emmvee E625HCBG132-T vs Emmvee E710HCBG132-T
7 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Emmvee
Emmvee E625HCBG132-T vs Emmvee E705HCBG 132-T
9 differences, the largest is rated power
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Emmvee E625HCBG132-T or Emmvee E710HCBG 132-T?
According to our database: Emmvee E625HCBG132-T has higher module efficiency (23.14% vs 22.86%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Emmvee E625HCBG132-T and Emmvee E710HCBG 132-T?
Emmvee E625HCBG132-T has a module efficiency of 23.14%, while Emmvee E710HCBG 132-T is 22.86%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Emmvee E625HCBG132-T use vs Emmvee E710HCBG 132-T?
Emmvee E625HCBG132-T uses TOPCon cells; Emmvee E710HCBG 132-T uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Emmvee E625HCBG132-T and Emmvee E710HCBG 132-T?
Emmvee E625HCBG132-T has a 30 years power warranty; Emmvee E710HCBG 132-T has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Emmvee E625HCBG132-T and Emmvee E710HCBG 132-T bifacial panels?
Both Emmvee E625HCBG132-T and Emmvee E710HCBG 132-T are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.