Emmvee E610HCBG132-T vs Emmvee E720HCBG 132-T
VS
The verdict
E720HCBG 132-T leads on the differences that matter
The largest is rated power: 110 W more power. 10 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 9 differencesHow alike are they
10
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
9 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
E610HCBG132-T
E720HCBG 132-T
Difference
Rated power
610 Wp
720 Wp
110 W more power
Module efficiency
22.58 %
23.18 %
0.60 pp more efficient
Weight
34.0 kg
37.8 kg
3.8 kg lighter
Short-circuit current
15.89 A
18.56 A
2.67 A apart
Module area
2.701 m²
3.106 m²
0.405 m² apart
Power density
225.8 Wp/m²
231.8 Wp/m²
6.0 Wp/m² higher
Weight per kWp
55.7 kg/kWp
52.5 kg/kWp
3.2 kg/kWp lighter
Current at max power
15.05 A
17.85 A
2.80 A apart
Dimensions
2382x1134x35 mm
2384x1303x33 mm
2382x1134x35 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
E610HCBG132-T
20,467 kWh
E720HCBG 132-T
24,157 kWh
Lifetime gap
3,690 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
E610HCBG132-T
E720HCBG 132-T
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
610 W
720 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.7% of rated power
583 W
689 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.3% of rated power
557 W
657 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.0% of rated power
530 W
626 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
E610HCBG132-T
E720HCBG 132-T
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
610 Wp
720 Wp
+110 W for E720HCBG 132-T
Module efficiency
22.58 %
23.18 %
+0.60 pp for E720HCBG 132-T
Power density
225.8 Wp/m²
231.8 Wp/m²
+6.0 Wp/m² for E720HCBG 132-T
Open-circuit voltage
48.88 V
48.60 V
Effectively the same
Voltage at max power
40.59 V
40.36 V
Effectively the same
Short-circuit current
15.89 A
18.56 A
2.67 A apart
Current at max power
15.05 A
17.85 A
2.80 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
2382x1134x35 mm
2384x1303x33 mm
2382x1134x35 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
Module area
2.701 m²
3.106 m²
0.405 m² apart
Weight
34.0 kg
37.8 kg
-3.8 kg for E610HCBG132-T
Weight per kWp
55.7 kg/kWp
52.5 kg/kWp
-3.2 kg/kWp for E720HCBG 132-T
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
12 yrs
12 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
TOPCon
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
132
132
Same
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#3,828
vs
#1,424
E720HCBG 132-T leads by 2,404 places
Power density
#3,729
vs
#1,347
E720HCBG 132-T leads by 2,382 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165
vs
#2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#10,132
vs
#6,043
E720HCBG 132-T leads by 4,089 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#3,346
vs
#540
E720HCBG 132-T leads by 2,806 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Emmvee
Emmvee E610HCBG132-T vs Emmvee E720HCBG132-T
9 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Emmvee
Emmvee E610HCBG132-T vs Emmvee E715HCBG 132-T
9 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Emmvee
Emmvee E610HCBG132-T vs Emmvee E715HCBG132-T
9 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Emmvee
Emmvee E610HCBG132-T vs Emmvee E710HCBG 132-T
8 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Emmvee
Emmvee E610HCBG132-T vs Emmvee E710HCBG132-T
8 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Emmvee
Emmvee E610HCBG132-T vs Emmvee E705HCBG 132-T
7 differences, the largest is rated power
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Emmvee E610HCBG132-T or Emmvee E720HCBG 132-T?
According to our database: Emmvee E720HCBG 132-T has higher module efficiency (23.18% vs 22.58%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Emmvee E610HCBG132-T and Emmvee E720HCBG 132-T?
Emmvee E610HCBG132-T has a module efficiency of 22.58%, while Emmvee E720HCBG 132-T is 23.18%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Emmvee E610HCBG132-T use vs Emmvee E720HCBG 132-T?
Emmvee E610HCBG132-T uses TOPCon cells; Emmvee E720HCBG 132-T uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Emmvee E610HCBG132-T and Emmvee E720HCBG 132-T?
Emmvee E610HCBG132-T has a 30 years power warranty; Emmvee E720HCBG 132-T has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Emmvee E610HCBG132-T and Emmvee E720HCBG 132-T bifacial panels?
Both Emmvee E610HCBG132-T and Emmvee E720HCBG 132-T are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.