Skip to main content
E605HCBT144-T vs ES80HCBT144-T 11 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Emmvee E605HCBT144-T vs Emmvee ES80HCBT144-T

Emmvee
E605HCBT144-T
605 Wp 23.42 % TOPCon Bifacial
VS
Emmvee
ES80HCBT144-T
580 Wp 22.45 % TOPCon Bifacial
The verdict

E605HCBT144-T leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.97 pp more efficient. 11 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 8 differences
How alike are they
11 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

8 of 19 parameters
Parameter E605HCBT144-T ES80HCBT144-T Difference
Module efficiency 23.42 % 22.45 % 0.97 pp more efficient
Performance warranty 25 yrs 30 yrs 5 yrs longer
Power density 234.2 Wp/m² 224.5 Wp/m² 9.7 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 605 Wp 580 Wp 25 W more power
Weight per kWp 43.0 kg/kWp 46.7 kg/kWp 3.7 kg/kWp lighter
Weight 26.0 kg 27.1 kg 1.1 kg lighter
Open-circuit voltage 52.47 V 51.47 V 1.00 V apart
Dimensions 2278x1134x35 mm 2278x1134x30 mm 2278x1134x35 mm vs 2278x1134x30 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
E605HCBT144-T
20,299 kWh
ES80HCBT144-T
19,460 kWh
Lifetime gap
839 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario E605HCBT144-T ES80HCBT144-T
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 605 W 580 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 579 W 555 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 552 W 530 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 526 W 504 W
03

Full specification

Parameter E605HCBT144-T ES80HCBT144-T Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 605 Wp 580 Wp +25 W for E605HCBT144-T
Module efficiency 23.42 % 22.45 % +0.97 pp for E605HCBT144-T
Power density 234.2 Wp/m² 224.5 Wp/m² +9.7 Wp/m² for E605HCBT144-T
Open-circuit voltage 52.47 V 51.47 V 1.00 V apart
Voltage at max power 43.42 V 42.59 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 14.67 A 14.37 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 13.95 A 13.62 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2278x1134x35 mm 2278x1134x30 mm 2278x1134x35 mm vs 2278x1134x30 mm
Module area 2.583 m² 2.583 m² Same
Weight 26.0 kg 27.1 kg -1.1 kg for E605HCBT144-T
Weight per kWp 43.0 kg/kWp 46.7 kg/kWp -3.7 kg/kWp for E605HCBT144-T
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 25 yrs 30 yrs +5 yrs for ES80HCBT144-T
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 144 144 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#865 vs #4,620
E605HCBT144-T leads by 3,755 places
Power density
#863 vs #4,547
E605HCBT144-T leads by 3,684 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165 vs #2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#259 vs #1,318
E605HCBT144-T leads by 1,059 places
Warranty
#9,798 vs #21
ES80HCBT144-T leads by 9,777 places
Overall
#3,406 vs #4,408
E605HCBT144-T leads by 1,002 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Emmvee
Emmvee E605HCBT144-T vs Emmvee E600HCBT144-T
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Emmvee
Emmvee E605HCBT144-T vs Emmvee E595HCBT144-T
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Emmvee
Emmvee E605HCBT144-T vs Emmvee E590HCBT144-T
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Emmvee
Emmvee E605HCBT144-T vs Emmvee E585HCBT144-T
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Emmvee
Emmvee E605HCBT144-T vs Emmvee E580HCBT144-T
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Emmvee
Emmvee E605HCBT144-T vs Emmvee E575HCBT144-T
5 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Emmvee E605HCBT144-T or Emmvee ES80HCBT144-T?
According to our database: Emmvee E605HCBT144-T has higher module efficiency (23.42% vs 22.45%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Emmvee E605HCBT144-T and Emmvee ES80HCBT144-T?
Emmvee E605HCBT144-T has a module efficiency of 23.42%, while Emmvee ES80HCBT144-T is 22.45%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Emmvee E605HCBT144-T use vs Emmvee ES80HCBT144-T?
Emmvee E605HCBT144-T uses TOPCon cells; Emmvee ES80HCBT144-T uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Emmvee E605HCBT144-T and Emmvee ES80HCBT144-T?
Emmvee E605HCBT144-T has a 25 years power warranty; Emmvee ES80HCBT144-T has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Emmvee E605HCBT144-T and Emmvee ES80HCBT144-T bifacial panels?
Both Emmvee E605HCBT144-T and Emmvee ES80HCBT144-T are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.