Skip to main content
E595HCBT144-T vs E585HCBT144-T 16 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Emmvee E595HCBT144-T vs Emmvee E585HCBT144-T

Emmvee
E595HCBT144-T
595 Wp 23.03 % TOPCon Bifacial
VS
Emmvee
E585HCBT144-T
585 Wp 22.65 % TOPCon Bifacial
The verdict

E595HCBT144-T leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.38 pp more efficient. 16 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 3 differences
How alike are they
16 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

3 of 19 parameters
Parameter E595HCBT144-T E585HCBT144-T Difference
Module efficiency 23.03 % 22.65 % 0.38 pp more efficient
Power density 230.3 Wp/m² 226.5 Wp/m² 3.9 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 595 Wp 585 Wp 10 W more power
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
E595HCBT144-T
19,963 kWh
E585HCBT144-T
19,628 kWh
Lifetime gap
335 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario E595HCBT144-T E585HCBT144-T
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 595 W 585 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 569 W 560 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 543 W 534 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 517 W 509 W
03

Full specification

Parameter E595HCBT144-T E585HCBT144-T Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 595 Wp 585 Wp +10 W for E595HCBT144-T
Module efficiency 23.03 % 22.65 % +0.38 pp for E595HCBT144-T
Power density 230.3 Wp/m² 226.5 Wp/m² +3.9 Wp/m² for E595HCBT144-T
Open-circuit voltage 52.07 V 51.67 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 43.08 V 42.78 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 14.55 A 14.43 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 13.82 A 13.68 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2278x1134x35 mm 2278x1134x35 mm Same
Module area 2.583 m² 2.583 m² Same
Weight 26.0 kg 26.0 kg Same
Weight per kWp 43.7 kg/kWp 44.4 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 25 yrs 25 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 144 144 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#1,744 vs #3,522
E595HCBT144-T leads by 1,778 places
Power density
#1,758 vs #3,500
E595HCBT144-T leads by 1,742 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165 vs #2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#333 vs #455
E595HCBT144-T leads by 122 places
Warranty
#9,798 vs #9,798
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#4,225 vs #4,970
E595HCBT144-T leads by 745 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Emmvee
Emmvee E595HCBT144-T vs Emmvee E605HCBT144-T
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Emmvee
Emmvee E595HCBT144-T vs Emmvee E600HCBT144-T
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Emmvee
Emmvee E595HCBT144-T vs Emmvee E590HCBT144-T
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Emmvee
Emmvee E595HCBT144-T vs Emmvee E580HCBT144-T
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Emmvee
Emmvee E595HCBT144-T vs Emmvee ES80HCBT144-T
7 differences, the largest is performance warranty
Same series, other bin
Emmvee
Emmvee E595HCBT144-T vs Emmvee E575HCBT144-T
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Emmvee E595HCBT144-T or Emmvee E585HCBT144-T?
According to our database: Emmvee E595HCBT144-T has higher module efficiency (23.03% vs 22.65%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Emmvee E595HCBT144-T and Emmvee E585HCBT144-T?
Emmvee E595HCBT144-T has a module efficiency of 23.03%, while Emmvee E585HCBT144-T is 22.65%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Emmvee E595HCBT144-T use vs Emmvee E585HCBT144-T?
Emmvee E595HCBT144-T uses TOPCon cells; Emmvee E585HCBT144-T uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Emmvee E595HCBT144-T and Emmvee E585HCBT144-T?
Emmvee E595HCBT144-T has a 25 years power warranty; Emmvee E585HCBT144-T has a 25 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Emmvee E595HCBT144-T and Emmvee E585HCBT144-T bifacial panels?
Both Emmvee E595HCBT144-T and Emmvee E585HCBT144-T are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.