Emmvee E550HCBG144 vs Emmvee E490HCBG132
VS
The verdict
E550HCBG144 leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 0.68 pp more efficient. 7 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 12 differencesHow alike are they
7
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
12 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
E550HCBG144
E490HCBG132
Difference
Module efficiency
21.29 %
20.61 %
0.68 pp more efficient
Rated power
550 Wp
490 Wp
60 W more power
Power density
212.9 Wp/m²
206.1 Wp/m²
6.9 Wp/m² higher
Open-circuit voltage
49.90 V
44.65 V
5.25 V apart
Module area
2.583 m²
2.378 m²
0.205 m² apart
Weight
30.0 kg
28.0 kg
2.0 kg lighter
Cell count
144
132
12 cells apart
Weight per kWp
54.5 kg/kWp
57.1 kg/kWp
2.6 kg/kWp lighter
Short-circuit current
14.01 A
13.09 A
0.92 A apart
Voltage at max power
41.62 V
38.94 V
2.68 V apart
Dimensions
2278x1134x35 mm
2097x1134x35 mm
2278x1134x35 mm vs 2097x1134x35 mm
Current at max power
13.22 A
12.59 A
0.63 A apart
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.350 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
E550HCBG144
18,112 kWh
E490HCBG132
16,136 kWh
Lifetime gap
1,976 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
E550HCBG144
E490HCBG132
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
550 W
490 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
94.8% of rated power
521 W
464 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
89.5% of rated power
492 W
439 W
Hot roof
70 °C
84.2% of rated power
463 W
413 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
E550HCBG144
E490HCBG132
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
550 Wp
490 Wp
+60 W for E550HCBG144
Module efficiency
21.29 %
20.61 %
+0.68 pp for E550HCBG144
Power density
212.9 Wp/m²
206.1 Wp/m²
+6.9 Wp/m² for E550HCBG144
Open-circuit voltage
49.90 V
44.65 V
5.25 V apart
Voltage at max power
41.62 V
38.94 V
2.68 V apart
Short-circuit current
14.01 A
13.09 A
0.92 A apart
Current at max power
13.22 A
12.59 A
0.63 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.350 %/°C
-0.350 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
2278x1134x35 mm
2097x1134x35 mm
2278x1134x35 mm vs 2097x1134x35 mm
Module area
2.583 m²
2.378 m²
0.205 m² apart
Weight
30.0 kg
28.0 kg
-2.0 kg for E490HCBG132
Weight per kWp
54.5 kg/kWp
57.1 kg/kWp
-2.6 kg/kWp for E550HCBG144
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
12 yrs
12 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.45 %/yr
0.45 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
PERC
PERC
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
144
132
12 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#8,708
vs
#11,082
E550HCBG144 leads by 2,374 places
Power density
#8,497
vs
#11,097
E550HCBG144 leads by 2,600 places
Heat behaviour
#10,419
vs
#10,419
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#8,867
vs
#11,083
E550HCBG144 leads by 2,216 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#6,944
vs
#9,797
E550HCBG144 leads by 2,853 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Emmvee
Emmvee E550HCBG144 vs Emmvee E545HCBG144
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Emmvee
Emmvee E550HCBG144 vs Emmvee E540HCBG144
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Emmvee
Emmvee E550HCBG144 vs Emmvee E535HCBG144
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Emmvee
Emmvee E550HCBG144 vs Emmvee E530HCBG144
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Emmvee
Emmvee E550HCBG144 vs Emmvee E500HCBG132
9 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Emmvee
Emmvee E550HCBG144 vs Emmvee E495HCBG132
12 differences, the largest is rated power
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Emmvee E550HCBG144 or Emmvee E490HCBG132?
According to our database: Emmvee E550HCBG144 has higher module efficiency (21.29% vs 20.61%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Emmvee E550HCBG144 and Emmvee E490HCBG132?
Emmvee E550HCBG144 has a module efficiency of 21.29%, while Emmvee E490HCBG132 is 20.61%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Emmvee E550HCBG144 use vs Emmvee E490HCBG132?
Emmvee E550HCBG144 uses PERC cells; Emmvee E490HCBG132 uses PERC. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Emmvee E550HCBG144 and Emmvee E490HCBG132?
Emmvee E550HCBG144 has a 30 years power warranty; Emmvee E490HCBG132 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Emmvee E550HCBG144 and Emmvee E490HCBG132 bifacial panels?
Both Emmvee E550HCBG144 and Emmvee E490HCBG132 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.
