Emmvee E485HCM132-B vs Emmvee E535HCM144-B
VS
The verdict
E535HCM144-B leads on the differences that matter
The largest is rated power: 50 W more power. 8 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 11 differencesHow alike are they
8
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
11 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
E485HCM132-B
E535HCM144-B
Difference
Rated power
485 Wp
535 Wp
50 W more power
Open-circuit voltage
44.43 V
49.35 V
4.92 V apart
Module area
2.378 m²
2.583 m²
0.205 m² apart
Module efficiency
20.40 %
20.71 %
0.31 pp more efficient
Weight per kWp
51.5 kg/kWp
48.6 kg/kWp
2.9 kg/kWp lighter
Power density
204.0 Wp/m²
207.1 Wp/m²
3.2 Wp/m² higher
Cell count
132
144
12 cells apart
Weight
25.0 kg
26.0 kg
1.0 kg lighter
Voltage at max power
38.81 V
41.32 V
2.51 V apart
Short-circuit current
13.00 A
13.59 A
0.59 A apart
Dimensions
2097x1134x35 mm
2278x1134x35 mm
2097x1134x35 mm vs 2278x1134x35 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.350 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
E485HCM132-B
15,718 kWh
E535HCM144-B
17,339 kWh
Lifetime gap
1,621 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
E485HCM132-B
E535HCM144-B
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
485 W
535 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
94.8% of rated power
460 W
507 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
89.5% of rated power
434 W
479 W
Hot roof
70 °C
84.2% of rated power
409 W
451 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
E485HCM132-B
E535HCM144-B
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
485 Wp
535 Wp
+50 W for E535HCM144-B
Module efficiency
20.40 %
20.71 %
+0.31 pp for E535HCM144-B
Power density
204.0 Wp/m²
207.1 Wp/m²
+3.2 Wp/m² for E535HCM144-B
Open-circuit voltage
44.43 V
49.35 V
4.92 V apart
Voltage at max power
38.81 V
41.32 V
2.51 V apart
Short-circuit current
13.00 A
13.59 A
0.59 A apart
Current at max power
12.50 A
12.95 A
Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.350 %/°C
-0.350 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
2097x1134x35 mm
2278x1134x35 mm
2097x1134x35 mm vs 2278x1134x35 mm
Module area
2.378 m²
2.583 m²
0.205 m² apart
Weight
25.0 kg
26.0 kg
-1.0 kg for E485HCM132-B
Weight per kWp
51.5 kg/kWp
48.6 kg/kWp
-2.9 kg/kWp for E535HCM144-B
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
12 yrs
12 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
25 yrs
25 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.55 %/yr
0.55 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
PERC
PERC
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
132
144
12 cells apart
Bifacial
No
No
Same
04
14,129 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#11,680
vs
#10,799
E535HCM144-B leads by 881 places
Power density
#11,691
vs
#10,842
E535HCM144-B leads by 849 places
Heat behaviour
#10,489
vs
#10,489
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#4,959
vs
#2,369
E535HCM144-B leads by 2,590 places
Warranty
#9,912
vs
#9,912
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#10,728
vs
#9,211
E535HCM144-B leads by 1,517 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Emmvee
Emmvee E485HCM132-B vs Emmvee E540HCM144-B
12 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Emmvee
Emmvee E485HCM132-B vs Emmvee E530HCM144-B
9 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Emmvee
Emmvee E485HCM132-B vs Emmvee E500HCM132-B
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Emmvee
Emmvee E485HCM132-B vs Emmvee E495HCM132-B
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Emmvee
Emmvee E485HCM132-B vs Emmvee E490HCM132-B
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Emmvee
Emmvee E485HCM132-B vs Emmvee E450HCM120-B
11 differences, the largest is rated power
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Emmvee E485HCM132-B or Emmvee E535HCM144-B?
According to our database: Emmvee E535HCM144-B has higher module efficiency (20.71% vs 20.40%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Emmvee E485HCM132-B and Emmvee E535HCM144-B?
Emmvee E485HCM132-B has a module efficiency of 20.40%, while Emmvee E535HCM144-B is 20.71%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Emmvee E485HCM132-B use vs Emmvee E535HCM144-B?
Emmvee E485HCM132-B uses PERC cells; Emmvee E535HCM144-B uses PERC. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Emmvee E485HCM132-B and Emmvee E535HCM144-B?
Emmvee E485HCM132-B has a 25 years power warranty; Emmvee E535HCM144-B has a 25 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.