Emmvee E485HCM132-B vs Emmvee E450HCM120-B
VS
The verdict
11 differences, and they point both ways
The largest is rated power: 35 W more power. 8 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 11 differencesHow alike are they
8
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
11 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
E485HCM132-B
E450HCM120-B
Difference
Rated power
485 Wp
450 Wp
35 W more power
Module efficiency
20.40 %
20.74 %
0.34 pp more efficient
Module area
2.378 m²
2.169 m²
0.209 m² apart
Open-circuit voltage
44.43 V
41.56 V
2.87 V apart
Power density
204.0 Wp/m²
207.4 Wp/m²
3.5 Wp/m² higher
Voltage at max power
38.81 V
34.31 V
4.50 V apart
Cell count
132
120
12 cells apart
Short-circuit current
13.00 A
13.81 A
0.81 A apart
Weight
25.0 kg
24.0 kg
1.0 kg lighter
Dimensions
2097x1134x35 mm
1913x1134x35 mm
2097x1134x35 mm vs 1913x1134x35 mm
Current at max power
12.50 A
13.12 A
0.62 A apart
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.350 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
E485HCM132-B
15,718 kWh
E450HCM120-B
14,584 kWh
Lifetime gap
1,134 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
E485HCM132-B
E450HCM120-B
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
485 W
450 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
94.8% of rated power
460 W
426 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
89.5% of rated power
434 W
403 W
Hot roof
70 °C
84.2% of rated power
409 W
379 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
E485HCM132-B
E450HCM120-B
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
485 Wp
450 Wp
+35 W for E485HCM132-B
Module efficiency
20.40 %
20.74 %
+0.34 pp for E450HCM120-B
Power density
204.0 Wp/m²
207.4 Wp/m²
+3.5 Wp/m² for E450HCM120-B
Open-circuit voltage
44.43 V
41.56 V
2.87 V apart
Voltage at max power
38.81 V
34.31 V
4.50 V apart
Short-circuit current
13.00 A
13.81 A
0.81 A apart
Current at max power
12.50 A
13.12 A
0.62 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.350 %/°C
-0.350 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
2097x1134x35 mm
1913x1134x35 mm
2097x1134x35 mm vs 1913x1134x35 mm
Module area
2.378 m²
2.169 m²
0.209 m² apart
Weight
25.0 kg
24.0 kg
-1.0 kg for E450HCM120-B
Weight per kWp
51.5 kg/kWp
53.3 kg/kWp
Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
12 yrs
12 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
25 yrs
25 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.55 %/yr
0.55 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
PERC
PERC
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
132
120
12 cells apart
Bifacial
No
No
Same
04
14,129 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#11,680
vs
#10,723
E450HCM120-B leads by 957 places
Power density
#11,691
vs
#10,697
E450HCM120-B leads by 994 places
Heat behaviour
#10,489
vs
#10,489
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#4,959
vs
#7,243
E485HCM132-B leads by 2,284 places
Warranty
#9,912
vs
#9,912
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#10,728
vs
#11,184
E485HCM132-B leads by 456 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Emmvee
Emmvee E485HCM132-B vs Emmvee E540HCM144-B
12 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Emmvee
Emmvee E485HCM132-B vs Emmvee E535HCM144-B
11 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Emmvee
Emmvee E485HCM132-B vs Emmvee E530HCM144-B
9 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Emmvee
Emmvee E485HCM132-B vs Emmvee E500HCM132-B
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Emmvee
Emmvee E485HCM132-B vs Emmvee E495HCM132-B
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Emmvee
Emmvee E485HCM132-B vs Emmvee E490HCM132-B
One difference: module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Emmvee E485HCM132-B or Emmvee E450HCM120-B?
According to our database: Emmvee E450HCM120-B has higher module efficiency (20.74% vs 20.40%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Emmvee E485HCM132-B and Emmvee E450HCM120-B?
Emmvee E485HCM132-B has a module efficiency of 20.40%, while Emmvee E450HCM120-B is 20.74%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Emmvee E485HCM132-B use vs Emmvee E450HCM120-B?
Emmvee E485HCM132-B uses PERC cells; Emmvee E450HCM120-B uses PERC. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Emmvee E485HCM132-B and Emmvee E450HCM120-B?
Emmvee E485HCM132-B has a 25 years power warranty; Emmvee E450HCM120-B has a 25 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.