Skip to main content
685NT66-HU/BF-DG vs 610NT60-HU/BF-DG 10 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

EGing PV EG-685NT66-HU/BF-DG vs EGing PV EG-610NT60-HU/BF-DG

EGing PV
EG-685NT66-HU/BF-DG
685 Wp 22.05 % TOPCon Bifacial
VS
EGing PV
EG-610NT60-HU/BF-DG
610 Wp 21.55 % TOPCon Bifacial
The verdict

685NT66-HU/BF-DG leads on the differences that matter

The largest is rated power: 75 W more power. 10 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 9 differences
How alike are they
10 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

9 of 19 parameters
Parameter 685NT66-HU/BF-DG 610NT60-HU/BF-DG Difference
Rated power 685 Wp 610 Wp 75 W more power
Module efficiency 22.05 % 21.55 % 0.50 pp more efficient
Weight 38.3 kg 35.0 kg 3.3 kg lighter
Open-circuit voltage 47.64 V 42.83 V 4.81 V apart
Module area 3.106 m² 2.830 m² 0.276 m² apart
Power density 220.5 Wp/m² 215.5 Wp/m² 5.0 Wp/m² higher
Voltage at max power 39.85 V 35.74 V 4.11 V apart
Cell count 132 120 12 cells apart
Dimensions 2384x1303x35 mm 2172x1303x35 mm 2384x1303x35 mm vs 2172x1303x35 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.300 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
685NT66-HU/BF-DG
22,983 kWh
610NT60-HU/BF-DG
20,467 kWh
Lifetime gap
2,516 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 685NT66-HU/BF-DG 610NT60-HU/BF-DG
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 685 W 610 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.5% of rated power 654 W 583 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.0% of rated power 623 W 555 W
Hot roof 70 °C 86.5% of rated power 593 W 528 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 685NT66-HU/BF-DG 610NT60-HU/BF-DG Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 685 Wp 610 Wp +75 W for 685NT66-HU/BF-DG
Module efficiency 22.05 % 21.55 % +0.50 pp for 685NT66-HU/BF-DG
Power density 220.5 Wp/m² 215.5 Wp/m² +5.0 Wp/m² for 685NT66-HU/BF-DG
Open-circuit voltage 47.64 V 42.83 V 4.81 V apart
Voltage at max power 39.85 V 35.74 V 4.11 V apart
Short-circuit current 18.22 A 18.08 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 17.19 A 17.07 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.300 %/°C -0.300 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x35 mm 2172x1303x35 mm 2384x1303x35 mm vs 2172x1303x35 mm
Module area 3.106 m² 2.830 m² 0.276 m² apart
Weight 38.3 kg 35.0 kg -3.3 kg for 610NT60-HU/BF-DG
Weight per kWp 55.9 kg/kWp 57.4 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 120 12 cells apart
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#6,233 vs #7,784
685NT66-HU/BF-DG leads by 1,551 places
Power density
#6,208 vs #7,727
685NT66-HU/BF-DG leads by 1,519 places
Heat behaviour
#6,093 vs #6,093
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#10,276 vs #11,191
685NT66-HU/BF-DG leads by 915 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#1,726 vs #4,578
685NT66-HU/BF-DG leads by 2,852 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
EGing PV
EGing PV EG-685NT66-HU/BF-DG vs EGing PV EG-680NT66-HU/BF-DG
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
EGing PV
EGing PV EG-685NT66-HU/BF-DG vs EGing PV EG-675NT66-HU/BF-DG
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
EGing PV
EGing PV EG-685NT66-HU/BF-DG vs EGing PV EG-670NT66-HU/BF-DG
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
EGing PV
EGing PV EG-685NT66-HU/BF-DG vs EGing PV EG-665NT66-HU/BF-DG
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
EGing PV
EGing PV EG-685NT66-HU/BF-DG vs EGing PV EG-660NT66-HU/BF-DG
6 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
EGing PV
EGing PV EG-685NT66-HU/BF-DG vs EGing PV EG-620NT60-HU/BF-DG
7 differences, the largest is rated power
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: EGing PV EG-685NT66-HU/BF-DG or EGing PV EG-610NT60-HU/BF-DG?
According to our database: EGing PV EG-685NT66-HU/BF-DG has higher module efficiency (22.05% vs 21.55%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of EGing PV EG-685NT66-HU/BF-DG and EGing PV EG-610NT60-HU/BF-DG?
EGing PV EG-685NT66-HU/BF-DG has a module efficiency of 22.05%, while EGing PV EG-610NT60-HU/BF-DG is 21.55%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does EGing PV EG-685NT66-HU/BF-DG use vs EGing PV EG-610NT60-HU/BF-DG?
EGing PV EG-685NT66-HU/BF-DG uses TOPCon cells; EGing PV EG-610NT60-HU/BF-DG uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on EGing PV EG-685NT66-HU/BF-DG and EGing PV EG-610NT60-HU/BF-DG?
EGing PV EG-685NT66-HU/BF-DG has a 30 years power warranty; EGing PV EG-610NT60-HU/BF-DG has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are EGing PV EG-685NT66-HU/BF-DG and EGing PV EG-610NT60-HU/BF-DG bifacial panels?
Both EGing PV EG-685NT66-HU/BF-DG and EGing PV EG-610NT60-HU/BF-DG are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 3 EGing PV offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.