Skip to main content
675NT66-HU/BF-DG vs 660NT66-HU/BF-DG 16 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

EGing PV EG-675NT66-HU/BF-DG vs EGing PV EG-660NT66-HU/BF-DG

EGing PV
EG-675NT66-HU/BF-DG
675 Wp 21.72 % TOPCon Bifacial
VS
EGing PV
EG-660NT66-HU/BF-DG
660 Wp 21.24 % TOPCon Bifacial
The verdict

675NT66-HU/BF-DG leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.48 pp more efficient. 16 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 3 differences
How alike are they
16 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

3 of 19 parameters
Parameter 675NT66-HU/BF-DG 660NT66-HU/BF-DG Difference
Module efficiency 21.72 % 21.24 % 0.48 pp more efficient
Power density 217.3 Wp/m² 212.5 Wp/m² 4.8 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 675 Wp 660 Wp 15 W more power
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.300 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
675NT66-HU/BF-DG
22,648 kWh
660NT66-HU/BF-DG
22,144 kWh
Lifetime gap
504 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 675NT66-HU/BF-DG 660NT66-HU/BF-DG
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 675 W 660 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.5% of rated power 645 W 630 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.0% of rated power 614 W 601 W
Hot roof 70 °C 86.5% of rated power 584 W 571 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 675NT66-HU/BF-DG 660NT66-HU/BF-DG Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 675 Wp 660 Wp +15 W for 675NT66-HU/BF-DG
Module efficiency 21.72 % 21.24 % +0.48 pp for 675NT66-HU/BF-DG
Power density 217.3 Wp/m² 212.5 Wp/m² +4.8 Wp/m² for 675NT66-HU/BF-DG
Open-circuit voltage 47.22 V 46.61 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 39.43 V 38.78 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 18.14 A 18.03 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 17.12 A 17.02 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.300 %/°C -0.300 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x35 mm 2384x1303x35 mm Same
Module area 3.106 m² 3.106 m² Same
Weight 38.3 kg 38.3 kg Same
Weight per kWp 56.7 kg/kWp 58.0 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#7,399 vs #9,034
675NT66-HU/BF-DG leads by 1,635 places
Power density
#7,349 vs #8,959
675NT66-HU/BF-DG leads by 1,610 places
Heat behaviour
#6,093 vs #6,093
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#10,836 vs #11,529
675NT66-HU/BF-DG leads by 693 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#2,173 vs #3,174
675NT66-HU/BF-DG leads by 1,001 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
EGing PV
EGing PV EG-675NT66-HU/BF-DG vs EGing PV EG-685NT66-HU/BF-DG
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
EGing PV
EGing PV EG-675NT66-HU/BF-DG vs EGing PV EG-680NT66-HU/BF-DG
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
EGing PV
EGing PV EG-675NT66-HU/BF-DG vs EGing PV EG-670NT66-HU/BF-DG
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
EGing PV
EGing PV EG-675NT66-HU/BF-DG vs EGing PV EG-665NT66-HU/BF-DG
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
EGing PV
EGing PV EG-675NT66-HU/BF-DG vs EGing PV EG-620NT60-HU/BF-DG
7 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
EGing PV
EGing PV EG-675NT66-HU/BF-DG vs EGing PV EG-615NT60-HU/BF-DG
7 differences, the largest is rated power
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: EGing PV EG-675NT66-HU/BF-DG or EGing PV EG-660NT66-HU/BF-DG?
According to our database: EGing PV EG-675NT66-HU/BF-DG has higher module efficiency (21.72% vs 21.24%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of EGing PV EG-675NT66-HU/BF-DG and EGing PV EG-660NT66-HU/BF-DG?
EGing PV EG-675NT66-HU/BF-DG has a module efficiency of 21.72%, while EGing PV EG-660NT66-HU/BF-DG is 21.24%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does EGing PV EG-675NT66-HU/BF-DG use vs EGing PV EG-660NT66-HU/BF-DG?
EGing PV EG-675NT66-HU/BF-DG uses TOPCon cells; EGing PV EG-660NT66-HU/BF-DG uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on EGing PV EG-675NT66-HU/BF-DG and EGing PV EG-660NT66-HU/BF-DG?
EGing PV EG-675NT66-HU/BF-DG has a 30 years power warranty; EGing PV EG-660NT66-HU/BF-DG has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are EGing PV EG-675NT66-HU/BF-DG and EGing PV EG-660NT66-HU/BF-DG bifacial panels?
Both EGing PV EG-675NT66-HU/BF-DG and EGing PV EG-660NT66-HU/BF-DG are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 3 EGing PV offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.