Skip to main content
670NT66-HU/BF-DG vs 620NT60-HU/BF-DG 10 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

EGing PV EG-670NT66-HU/BF-DG vs EGing PV EG-620NT60-HU/BF-DG

EGing PV
EG-670NT66-HU/BF-DG
670 Wp 21.56 % TOPCon Bifacial
VS
EGing PV
EG-620NT60-HU/BF-DG
620 Wp 21.90 % TOPCon Bifacial
The verdict

9 differences, and they point both ways

The largest is rated power: 50 W more power. 10 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 9 differences
How alike are they
10 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

9 of 19 parameters
Parameter 670NT66-HU/BF-DG 620NT60-HU/BF-DG Difference
Rated power 670 Wp 620 Wp 50 W more power
Weight 38.3 kg 35.0 kg 3.3 kg lighter
Module efficiency 21.56 % 21.90 % 0.34 pp more efficient
Module area 3.106 m² 2.830 m² 0.276 m² apart
Open-circuit voltage 47.01 V 43.27 V 3.74 V apart
Power density 215.7 Wp/m² 219.1 Wp/m² 3.4 Wp/m² higher
Cell count 132 120 12 cells apart
Voltage at max power 39.21 V 36.18 V 3.03 V apart
Dimensions 2384x1303x35 mm 2172x1303x35 mm 2384x1303x35 mm vs 2172x1303x35 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.300 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
670NT66-HU/BF-DG
22,480 kWh
620NT60-HU/BF-DG
20,802 kWh
Lifetime gap
1,678 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 670NT66-HU/BF-DG 620NT60-HU/BF-DG
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 670 W 620 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.5% of rated power 640 W 592 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.0% of rated power 610 W 564 W
Hot roof 70 °C 86.5% of rated power 580 W 536 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 670NT66-HU/BF-DG 620NT60-HU/BF-DG Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 670 Wp 620 Wp +50 W for 670NT66-HU/BF-DG
Module efficiency 21.56 % 21.90 % +0.34 pp for 620NT60-HU/BF-DG
Power density 215.7 Wp/m² 219.1 Wp/m² +3.4 Wp/m² for 620NT60-HU/BF-DG
Open-circuit voltage 47.01 V 43.27 V 3.74 V apart
Voltage at max power 39.21 V 36.18 V 3.03 V apart
Short-circuit current 18.10 A 18.16 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 17.09 A 17.14 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.300 %/°C -0.300 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x35 mm 2172x1303x35 mm 2384x1303x35 mm vs 2172x1303x35 mm
Module area 3.106 m² 2.830 m² 0.276 m² apart
Weight 38.3 kg 35.0 kg -3.3 kg for 620NT60-HU/BF-DG
Weight per kWp 57.2 kg/kWp 56.5 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 120 12 cells apart
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#7,774 vs #6,783
620NT60-HU/BF-DG leads by 991 places
Power density
#7,644 vs #6,743
620NT60-HU/BF-DG leads by 901 places
Heat behaviour
#6,093 vs #6,093
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#11,112 vs #10,653
620NT60-HU/BF-DG leads by 459 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#2,497 vs #3,837
670NT66-HU/BF-DG leads by 1,340 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
EGing PV
EGing PV EG-670NT66-HU/BF-DG vs EGing PV EG-685NT66-HU/BF-DG
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
EGing PV
EGing PV EG-670NT66-HU/BF-DG vs EGing PV EG-680NT66-HU/BF-DG
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
EGing PV
EGing PV EG-670NT66-HU/BF-DG vs EGing PV EG-675NT66-HU/BF-DG
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
EGing PV
EGing PV EG-670NT66-HU/BF-DG vs EGing PV EG-665NT66-HU/BF-DG
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
EGing PV
EGing PV EG-670NT66-HU/BF-DG vs EGing PV EG-660NT66-HU/BF-DG
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
EGing PV
EGing PV EG-670NT66-HU/BF-DG vs EGing PV EG-615NT60-HU/BF-DG
7 differences, the largest is rated power
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: EGing PV EG-670NT66-HU/BF-DG or EGing PV EG-620NT60-HU/BF-DG?
According to our database: EGing PV EG-620NT60-HU/BF-DG has higher module efficiency (21.90% vs 21.56%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of EGing PV EG-670NT66-HU/BF-DG and EGing PV EG-620NT60-HU/BF-DG?
EGing PV EG-670NT66-HU/BF-DG has a module efficiency of 21.56%, while EGing PV EG-620NT60-HU/BF-DG is 21.90%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does EGing PV EG-670NT66-HU/BF-DG use vs EGing PV EG-620NT60-HU/BF-DG?
EGing PV EG-670NT66-HU/BF-DG uses TOPCon cells; EGing PV EG-620NT60-HU/BF-DG uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on EGing PV EG-670NT66-HU/BF-DG and EGing PV EG-620NT60-HU/BF-DG?
EGing PV EG-670NT66-HU/BF-DG has a 30 years power warranty; EGing PV EG-620NT60-HU/BF-DG has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are EGing PV EG-670NT66-HU/BF-DG and EGing PV EG-620NT60-HU/BF-DG bifacial panels?
Both EGing PV EG-670NT66-HU/BF-DG and EGing PV EG-620NT60-HU/BF-DG are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 3 EGing PV offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.