Skip to main content
530W vs 520W 14 of 18 identical Swap Change panels

Daxieworld AOX-144M10FL 530W vs Daxieworld AOX-144M10FL 520W

Daxieworld
AOX-144M10FL 530W
530 Wp 19.91 % Flexible Incomplete
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
Daxieworld
AOX-144M10FL 520W
520 Wp 19.54 % PERC Incomplete
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

530W leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.37 pp more efficient. 14 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.

See all 4 differences
How alike are they
14 of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs not published
01

What actually differs

4 of 18 parameters
Parameter 530W 520W Difference
Module efficiency 19.91 % 19.54 % 0.37 pp more efficient
Power density 199.1 Wp/m² 195.4 Wp/m² 3.8 Wp/m² higher
Cell technology Flexible PERC Flexible vs PERC
Rated power 530 Wp 520 Wp 10 W more power
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
A 1.0% first-year loss then 0.40% a year, assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.370 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
530W
17,783 kWh
520W
17,447 kWh
Lifetime gap
336 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 530W 520W
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 530 W 520 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 94.5% of rated power 501 W 491 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 88.9% of rated power 471 W 462 W
Hot roof 70 °C 83.3% of rated power 442 W 433 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 530W 520W Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 530 Wp 520 Wp +10 W for 530W
Module efficiency 19.91 % 19.54 % +0.37 pp for 530W
Power density 199.1 Wp/m² 195.4 Wp/m² +3.8 Wp/m² for 530W
Open-circuit voltage 49.24 V 48.94 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 41.39 V 41.03 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 13.76 A 13.64 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 12.81 A 12.67 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.370 %/°C -0.370 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2246x1185x3 mm 2246x1185x3 mm Same
Module area 2.662 m² 2.662 m² Same
Weight 8.0 kg 8.0 kg Same
Weight per kWp 15.1 kg/kWp 15.4 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 25 yrs 25 yrs Same
Annual degradation - - Neither datasheet publishes this
Technology
Cell technology Flexible PERC Flexible vs PERC
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 108 108 Same
Bifacial No No Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#12,328 vs #12,649
530W leads by 321 places
Power density
#12,323 vs #12,632
530W leads by 309 places
Heat behaviour
#13,081 vs #13,081
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#14 vs #24
530W leads by 10 places
Warranty
#9,798 vs #9,798
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#8,310 vs #9,088
530W leads by 778 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Daxieworld
Daxieworld AOX-144M10FL 530W vs Daxieworld AOX-144M10FL 535W
One difference: cell technology
Same series, other bin
Daxieworld
Daxieworld AOX-144M10FL 530W vs Daxieworld AOX-144M10FL 525W
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Daxieworld
Daxieworld AOX-144M10FL 530W vs Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL 485W
6 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Daxieworld
Daxieworld AOX-144M10FL 530W vs Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL 480W
8 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Daxieworld
Daxieworld AOX-144M10FL 530W vs Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL 475W
7 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Daxieworld
Daxieworld AOX-144M10FL 530W vs Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL 470W
7 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Daxieworld AOX-144M10FL 530W or Daxieworld AOX-144M10FL 520W?
According to our database: Daxieworld AOX-144M10FL 530 W has higher module efficiency (19.91% vs 19.54%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Daxieworld AOX-144M10FL 530W and Daxieworld AOX-144M10FL 520W?
Daxieworld AOX-144M10FL 530 W has a module efficiency of 19.91%, while Daxieworld AOX-144M10FL 520 W is 19.54%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Daxieworld AOX-144M10FL 530W use vs Daxieworld AOX-144M10FL 520W?
Daxieworld AOX-144M10FL 530 W uses Flexible cells; Daxieworld AOX-144M10FL 520 W uses PERC. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Daxieworld AOX-144M10FL 530W and Daxieworld AOX-144M10FL 520W?
Daxieworld AOX-144M10FL 530 W has a 25 years power warranty; Daxieworld AOX-144M10FL 520 W has a 25 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.