Daxieworld AOX-144M10FL 525W vs Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL 485W
VS
The verdict
144M10FL 525W leads on the differences that matter
The largest is rated power: 40 W more power. 12 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.
See all 6 differencesHow alike are they
12
of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
not published
01
6 of 18 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
144M10FL 525W
132M10FL 485W
Difference
Rated power
525 Wp
485 Wp
40 W more power
Module area
2.662 m²
2.453 m²
0.209 m² apart
Open-circuit voltage
49.09 V
45.16 V
3.93 V apart
Cell technology
Flexible
PERC
Flexible vs PERC
Voltage at max power
41.21 V
37.95 V
3.26 V apart
Dimensions
2246x1185x3 mm
2246x1092x3 mm
2246x1185x3 mm vs 2246x1092x3 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
A 1.0% first-year loss then 0.40% a year, assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.370 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
144M10FL 525W
17,615 kWh
132M10FL 485W
16,273 kWh
Lifetime gap
1,342 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
144M10FL 525W
132M10FL 485W
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
525 W
485 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
94.5% of rated power
496 W
458 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
88.9% of rated power
467 W
431 W
Hot roof
70 °C
83.3% of rated power
438 W
404 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
144M10FL 525W
132M10FL 485W
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
525 Wp
485 Wp
+40 W for 144M10FL 525W
Module efficiency
19.73 %
19.77 %
Effectively the same
Power density
197.3 Wp/m²
197.7 Wp/m²
Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage
49.09 V
45.16 V
3.93 V apart
Voltage at max power
41.21 V
37.95 V
3.26 V apart
Short-circuit current
13.70 A
13.78 A
Effectively the same
Current at max power
12.75 A
12.79 A
Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.370 %/°C
-0.370 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
2246x1185x3 mm
2246x1092x3 mm
2246x1185x3 mm vs 2246x1092x3 mm
Module area
2.662 m²
2.453 m²
0.209 m² apart
Weight
8.0 kg
7.4 kg
Effectively the same
Weight per kWp
15.2 kg/kWp
15.3 kg/kWp
Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
12 yrs
12 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
25 yrs
25 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
-
-
Neither datasheet publishes this
Technology
Cell technology
Flexible
PERC
Flexible vs PERC
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
108
108
Same
Bifacial
No
No
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#12,495
vs
#12,478
132M10FL 485W leads by 17 places
Power density
#12,489
vs
#12,422
132M10FL 485W leads by 67 places
Heat behaviour
#13,081
vs
#13,081
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#20
vs
#21
144M10FL 525W leads by 1 place
Warranty
#9,798
vs
#9,798
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#8,684
vs
#9,733
144M10FL 525W leads by 1,049 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Daxieworld
Daxieworld AOX-144M10FL 525W vs Daxieworld AOX-144M10FL 535W
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Daxieworld
Daxieworld AOX-144M10FL 525W vs Daxieworld AOX-144M10FL 530W
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Daxieworld
Daxieworld AOX-144M10FL 525W vs Daxieworld AOX-144M10FL 520W
One difference: cell technology
Same series, other bin
Daxieworld
Daxieworld AOX-144M10FL 525W vs Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL 480W
6 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Daxieworld
Daxieworld AOX-144M10FL 525W vs Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL 475W
7 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Daxieworld
Daxieworld AOX-144M10FL 525W vs Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL 470W
7 differences, the largest is rated power
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Daxieworld AOX-144M10FL 525W or Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL 485W?
According to our database: Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL 485 W has higher module efficiency (19.77% vs 19.73%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Daxieworld AOX-144M10FL 525W and Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL 485W?
Daxieworld AOX-144M10FL 525 W has a module efficiency of 19.73%, while Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL 485 W is 19.77%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Daxieworld AOX-144M10FL 525W use vs Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL 485W?
Daxieworld AOX-144M10FL 525 W uses Flexible cells; Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL 485 W uses PERC. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Daxieworld AOX-144M10FL 525W and Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL 485W?
Daxieworld AOX-144M10FL 525 W has a 25 years power warranty; Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL 485 W has a 25 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.