Skip to main content
144M10FL 520W vs 132M10FL 480W 13 of 18 identical Swap Change panels

Daxieworld AOX-144M10FL 520W vs Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL 480W

Daxieworld
AOX-144M10FL 520W
520 Wp 19.54 % PERC Incomplete
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
Daxieworld
AOX-132M10FL 480W
480 Wp 19.57 % PERC Incomplete
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

144M10FL 520W leads on the differences that matter

The largest is rated power: 40 W more power. 13 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.

See all 5 differences
How alike are they
13 of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs not published
01

What actually differs

5 of 18 parameters
Parameter 144M10FL 520W 132M10FL 480W Difference
Rated power 520 Wp 480 Wp 40 W more power
Module area 2.662 m² 2.453 m² 0.209 m² apart
Open-circuit voltage 48.94 V 45.01 V 3.93 V apart
Voltage at max power 41.03 V 37.78 V 3.25 V apart
Dimensions 2246x1185x3 mm 2246x1092x3 mm 2246x1185x3 mm vs 2246x1092x3 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
A 1.0% first-year loss then 0.40% a year, assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.370 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
144M10FL 520W
17,447 kWh
132M10FL 480W
16,105 kWh
Lifetime gap
1,342 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 144M10FL 520W 132M10FL 480W
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 520 W 480 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 94.5% of rated power 491 W 453 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 88.9% of rated power 462 W 427 W
Hot roof 70 °C 83.3% of rated power 433 W 400 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 144M10FL 520W 132M10FL 480W Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 520 Wp 480 Wp +40 W for 144M10FL 520W
Module efficiency 19.54 % 19.57 % Effectively the same
Power density 195.4 Wp/m² 195.7 Wp/m² Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage 48.94 V 45.01 V 3.93 V apart
Voltage at max power 41.03 V 37.78 V 3.25 V apart
Short-circuit current 13.64 A 13.72 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 12.67 A 12.71 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.370 %/°C -0.370 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2246x1185x3 mm 2246x1092x3 mm 2246x1185x3 mm vs 2246x1092x3 mm
Module area 2.662 m² 2.453 m² 0.209 m² apart
Weight 8.0 kg 7.4 kg Effectively the same
Weight per kWp 15.4 kg/kWp 15.4 kg/kWp Same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 25 yrs 25 yrs Same
Annual degradation - - Neither datasheet publishes this
Technology
Cell technology PERC PERC Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 108 108 Same
Bifacial No No Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#12,649 vs #12,630
132M10FL 480W leads by 19 places
Power density
#12,632 vs #12,602
132M10FL 480W leads by 30 places
Heat behaviour
#13,081 vs #13,081
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#24 vs #26
144M10FL 520W leads by 2 places
Warranty
#9,798 vs #9,798
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#9,088 vs #10,011
144M10FL 520W leads by 923 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Daxieworld
Daxieworld AOX-144M10FL 520W vs Daxieworld AOX-144M10FL 535W
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Daxieworld
Daxieworld AOX-144M10FL 520W vs Daxieworld AOX-144M10FL 530W
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Daxieworld
Daxieworld AOX-144M10FL 520W vs Daxieworld AOX-144M10FL 525W
One difference: cell technology
Same series, other bin
Daxieworld
Daxieworld AOX-144M10FL 520W vs Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL 485W
6 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Daxieworld
Daxieworld AOX-144M10FL 520W vs Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL 475W
6 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Daxieworld
Daxieworld AOX-144M10FL 520W vs Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL 470W
8 differences, the largest is rated power
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Daxieworld AOX-144M10FL 520W or Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL 480W?
According to our database: Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL 480 W has higher module efficiency (19.57% vs 19.54%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Daxieworld AOX-144M10FL 520W and Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL 480W?
Daxieworld AOX-144M10FL 520 W has a module efficiency of 19.54%, while Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL 480 W is 19.57%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Daxieworld AOX-144M10FL 520W use vs Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL 480W?
Daxieworld AOX-144M10FL 520 W uses PERC cells; Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL 480 W uses PERC. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Daxieworld AOX-144M10FL 520W and Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL 480W?
Daxieworld AOX-144M10FL 520 W has a 25 years power warranty; Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL 480 W has a 25 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.