Skip to main content
485W vs 475W 14 of 18 identical Swap Change panels

Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL 485W vs Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL 475W

Daxieworld
AOX-132M10FL 485W
485 Wp 19.77 % PERC Incomplete
VS
Daxieworld
AOX-132M10FL 475W
475 Wp 19.37 % Flexible Incomplete
The verdict

485W leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.40 pp more efficient. 14 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.

See all 4 differences
How alike are they
14 of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs not published
01

What actually differs

4 of 18 parameters
Parameter 485W 475W Difference
Module efficiency 19.77 % 19.37 % 0.40 pp more efficient
Power density 197.7 Wp/m² 193.7 Wp/m² 4.1 Wp/m² higher
Cell technology PERC Flexible PERC vs Flexible
Rated power 485 Wp 475 Wp 10 W more power
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
A 1.0% first-year loss then 0.40% a year, assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.370 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
485W
16,273 kWh
475W
15,937 kWh
Lifetime gap
336 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 485W 475W
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 485 W 475 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 94.5% of rated power 458 W 449 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 88.9% of rated power 431 W 422 W
Hot roof 70 °C 83.3% of rated power 404 W 396 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 485W 475W Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 485 Wp 475 Wp +10 W for 485W
Module efficiency 19.77 % 19.37 % +0.40 pp for 485W
Power density 197.7 Wp/m² 193.7 Wp/m² +4.1 Wp/m² for 485W
Open-circuit voltage 45.16 V 44.86 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 37.95 V 37.61 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 13.78 A 13.66 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 12.79 A 12.64 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.370 %/°C -0.370 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2246x1092x3 mm 2246x1092x3 mm Same
Module area 2.453 m² 2.453 m² Same
Weight 7.4 kg 7.4 kg Same
Weight per kWp 15.3 kg/kWp 15.6 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 25 yrs 25 yrs Same
Annual degradation - - Neither datasheet publishes this
Technology
Cell technology PERC Flexible PERC vs Flexible
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 108 108 Same
Bifacial No No Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#12,478 vs #12,772
485W leads by 294 places
Power density
#12,422 vs #12,747
485W leads by 325 places
Heat behaviour
#13,081 vs #13,081
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#21 vs #33
485W leads by 12 places
Warranty
#9,798 vs #9,798
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#9,733 vs #10,250
485W leads by 517 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Daxieworld
Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL 485W vs Daxieworld AOX-144M10FL 535W
7 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Daxieworld
Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL 485W vs Daxieworld AOX-144M10FL 530W
6 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Daxieworld
Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL 485W vs Daxieworld AOX-144M10FL 525W
6 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Daxieworld
Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL 485W vs Daxieworld AOX-144M10FL 520W
6 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Daxieworld
Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL 485W vs Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL 480W
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Daxieworld
Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL 485W vs Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL 470W
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL 485W or Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL 475W?
According to our database: Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL 485 W has higher module efficiency (19.77% vs 19.37%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL 485W and Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL 475W?
Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL 485 W has a module efficiency of 19.77%, while Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL 475 W is 19.37%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL 485W use vs Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL 475W?
Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL 485 W uses PERC cells; Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL 475 W uses Flexible. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL 485W and Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL 475W?
Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL 485 W has a 25 years power warranty; Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL 475 W has a 25 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.