Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL 475W vs Daxieworld AOX-144M10FL 525W
VS
The verdict
144M10FL 525W leads on the differences that matter
The largest is rated power: 50 W more power. 11 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.
See all 7 differencesHow alike are they
11
of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
not published
01
7 of 18 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
132M10FL 475W
144M10FL 525W
Difference
Rated power
475 Wp
525 Wp
50 W more power
Module efficiency
19.37 %
19.73 %
0.36 pp more efficient
Open-circuit voltage
44.86 V
49.09 V
4.23 V apart
Module area
2.453 m²
2.662 m²
0.209 m² apart
Power density
193.7 Wp/m²
197.3 Wp/m²
3.6 Wp/m² higher
Voltage at max power
37.61 V
41.21 V
3.60 V apart
Dimensions
2246x1092x3 mm
2246x1185x3 mm
2246x1092x3 mm vs 2246x1185x3 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
A 1.0% first-year loss then 0.40% a year, assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.370 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
132M10FL 475W
15,937 kWh
144M10FL 525W
17,615 kWh
Lifetime gap
1,678 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
132M10FL 475W
144M10FL 525W
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
475 W
525 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
94.5% of rated power
449 W
496 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
88.9% of rated power
422 W
467 W
Hot roof
70 °C
83.3% of rated power
396 W
438 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
132M10FL 475W
144M10FL 525W
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
475 Wp
525 Wp
+50 W for 144M10FL 525W
Module efficiency
19.37 %
19.73 %
+0.36 pp for 144M10FL 525W
Power density
193.7 Wp/m²
197.3 Wp/m²
+3.6 Wp/m² for 144M10FL 525W
Open-circuit voltage
44.86 V
49.09 V
4.23 V apart
Voltage at max power
37.61 V
41.21 V
3.60 V apart
Short-circuit current
13.66 A
13.70 A
Effectively the same
Current at max power
12.64 A
12.75 A
Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.370 %/°C
-0.370 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
2246x1092x3 mm
2246x1185x3 mm
2246x1092x3 mm vs 2246x1185x3 mm
Module area
2.453 m²
2.662 m²
0.209 m² apart
Weight
7.4 kg
8.0 kg
Effectively the same
Weight per kWp
15.6 kg/kWp
15.2 kg/kWp
Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
12 yrs
12 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
25 yrs
25 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
-
-
Neither datasheet publishes this
Technology
Cell technology
Flexible
Flexible
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
108
108
Same
Bifacial
No
No
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#12,772
vs
#12,495
144M10FL 525W leads by 277 places
Power density
#12,747
vs
#12,489
144M10FL 525W leads by 258 places
Heat behaviour
#13,081
vs
#13,081
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#33
vs
#20
144M10FL 525W leads by 13 places
Warranty
#9,798
vs
#9,798
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#10,250
vs
#8,684
144M10FL 525W leads by 1,566 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Daxieworld
Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL 475W vs Daxieworld AOX-144M10FL 535W
8 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Daxieworld
Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL 475W vs Daxieworld AOX-144M10FL 530W
7 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Daxieworld
Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL 475W vs Daxieworld AOX-144M10FL 520W
6 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Daxieworld
Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL 475W vs Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL 485W
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Daxieworld
Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL 475W vs Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL 480W
2 differences, the largest is cell technology
Same series, other bin
Daxieworld
Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL 475W vs Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL 470W
One difference: module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL 475W or Daxieworld AOX-144M10FL 525W?
According to our database: Daxieworld AOX-144M10FL 525 W has higher module efficiency (19.73% vs 19.37%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL 475W and Daxieworld AOX-144M10FL 525W?
Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL 475 W has a module efficiency of 19.37%, while Daxieworld AOX-144M10FL 525 W is 19.73%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL 475W use vs Daxieworld AOX-144M10FL 525W?
Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL 475 W uses Flexible cells; Daxieworld AOX-144M10FL 525 W uses Flexible. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL 475W and Daxieworld AOX-144M10FL 525W?
Daxieworld AOX-132M10FL 475 W has a 25 years power warranty; Daxieworld AOX-144M10FL 525 W has a 25 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.