DAS Solar DAS-DH156NA-650W vs DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-715
VS
The verdict
10 differences, and they point both ways
The largest is rated power: 65 W more power. 8 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.
See all 10 differencesHow alike are they
8
of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
not published
01
10 of 18 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
DH156NA-650W
DH132NC-715
Difference
Rated power
650 Wp
715 Wp
65 W more power
Weight
34.3 kg
38.3 kg
4.0 kg lighter
Temperature coefficient
-0.300 %/°C
-0.280 %/°C
0.020 %/°C better in heat
Open-circuit voltage
56.55 V
49.08 V
7.47 V apart
Short-circuit current
14.59 A
18.47 A
3.88 A apart
Module area
2.795 m²
3.106 m²
0.311 m² apart
Module efficiency
23.30 %
23.00 %
0.30 pp more efficient
Voltage at max power
46.97 V
40.98 V
5.99 V apart
Current at max power
13.84 A
17.45 A
3.61 A apart
Dimensions
2465x1134x30 mm
2384x1303x33 mm
2465x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
DH156NA-650W
21,809 kWh
DH132NC-715
23,990 kWh
Lifetime gap
2,181 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
DH156NA-650W
DH132NC-715
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
650 W
715 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.5% of rated power
621 W
685 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.0% of rated power
592 W
655 W
Hot roof
70 °C
86.5% of rated power
562 W
625 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
DH156NA-650W
DH132NC-715
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
650 Wp
715 Wp
+65 W for DH132NC-715
Module efficiency
23.30 %
23.00 %
+0.30 pp for DH156NA-650W
Power density
232.5 Wp/m²
230.2 Wp/m²
Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage
56.55 V
49.08 V
7.47 V apart
Voltage at max power
46.97 V
40.98 V
5.99 V apart
Short-circuit current
14.59 A
18.47 A
3.88 A apart
Current at max power
13.84 A
17.45 A
3.61 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.300 %/°C
-0.280 %/°C
+0.020 %/°C for DH132NC-715
Mechanical
Dimensions
2465x1134x30 mm
2384x1303x33 mm
2465x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
Module area
2.795 m²
3.106 m²
0.311 m² apart
Weight
34.3 kg
38.3 kg
-4.0 kg for DH156NA-650W
Weight per kWp
52.8 kg/kWp
53.6 kg/kWp
Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
15 yrs
15 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
TOPCon
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
-
132
Not published by DAS Solar
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#1,017
vs
#1,919
DH156NA-650W leads by 902 places
Power density
#1,222
vs
#2,018
DH156NA-650W leads by 796 places
Heat behaviour
#6,093
vs
#1,309
DH132NC-715 leads by 4,784 places
Weight
#6,449
vs
#7,566
DH156NA-650W leads by 1,117 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#1,318
vs
#450
DH132NC-715 leads by 868 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
DAS Solar
DAS Solar DAS-DH156NA-650W vs DAS Solar DAS-DH156NA-645W
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
DAS Solar
DAS Solar DAS-DH156NA-650W vs DAS Solar DAS-DH156NA-640W
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
DAS Solar
DAS Solar DAS-DH156NA-650W vs DAS Solar DAS-DH156NA-635W
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
DAS Solar
DAS Solar DAS-DH156NA-650W vs DAS Solar DAS-DH156NA-630W
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
DAS Solar
DAS Solar DAS-DH156NA-650W vs DAS Solar DAS-DH156NA-625W
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
DAS Solar
DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-715 vs DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-710
The same specification on paper
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: DAS Solar DAS-DH156NA-650W or DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-715?
According to our database: DAS Solar DAS-DH156NA-650 W has higher module efficiency (23.30% vs 23.00%); DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-715 tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.280%/°C vs -0.300%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of DAS Solar DAS-DH156NA-650W and DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-715?
DAS Solar DAS-DH156NA-650 W has a module efficiency of 23.30%, while DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-715 is 23.00%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does DAS Solar DAS-DH156NA-650W use vs DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-715?
DAS Solar DAS-DH156NA-650 W uses TOPCon cells; DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-715 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on DAS Solar DAS-DH156NA-650W and DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-715?
DAS Solar DAS-DH156NA-650 W has a 30 years power warranty; DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-715 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are DAS Solar DAS-DH156NA-650W and DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-715 bifacial panels?
Both DAS Solar DAS-DH156NA-650 W and DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-715 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 4 DAS Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.