Skip to main content
DH132NC-715 vs DH96NE.A-470 6 of 18 identical Swap Change panels

DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-715 vs DAS Solar DAS-DH96NE.A-470

DAS Solar
DAS-DH132NC-715
715 Wp 23.00 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
DAS Solar DAS-DH96NE.A-470
DAS Solar
DAS-DH96NE.A-470
470 Wp 23.50 % TOPCon
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

DH96NE.A-470 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is rated power: 245 W more power. 6 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.

See all 12 differences
How alike are they
6 of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs not published
01

What actually differs

12 of 18 parameters
Parameter DH132NC-715 DH96NE.A-470 Difference
Rated power 715 Wp 470 Wp 245 W more power
Module efficiency 23.00 % 23.50 % 0.50 pp more efficient
Weight 38.3 kg 21.6 kg 16.7 kg lighter
Weight per kWp 53.6 kg/kWp 46.0 kg/kWp 7.6 kg/kWp lighter
Open-circuit voltage 49.08 V 35.89 V 13.19 V apart
Short-circuit current 18.47 A 16.43 A 2.04 A apart
Module area 3.106 m² 1.998 m² 1.108 m² apart
Power density 230.2 Wp/m² 235.2 Wp/m² 5.0 Wp/m² higher
Voltage at max power 40.98 V 30.56 V 10.42 V apart
Current at max power 17.45 A 15.38 A 2.07 A apart
Bifacial Yes No Yes vs No
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 1762x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm vs 1762x1134x30 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.280 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
DH132NC-715
23,990 kWh
DH96NE.A-470
15,769 kWh
Lifetime gap
8,221 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario DH132NC-715 DH96NE.A-470
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 715 W 470 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.8% of rated power 685 W 450 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.6% of rated power 655 W 431 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.4% of rated power 625 W 411 W
03

Full specification

Parameter DH132NC-715 DH96NE.A-470 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 715 Wp 470 Wp +245 W for DH132NC-715
Module efficiency 23.00 % 23.50 % +0.50 pp for DH96NE.A-470
Power density 230.2 Wp/m² 235.2 Wp/m² +5.0 Wp/m² for DH96NE.A-470
Open-circuit voltage 49.08 V 35.89 V 13.19 V apart
Voltage at max power 40.98 V 30.56 V 10.42 V apart
Short-circuit current 18.47 A 16.43 A 2.04 A apart
Current at max power 17.45 A 15.38 A 2.07 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.280 %/°C -0.280 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 1762x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm vs 1762x1134x30 mm
Module area 3.106 m² 1.998 m² 1.108 m² apart
Weight 38.3 kg 21.6 kg -16.7 kg for DH96NE.A-470
Weight per kWp 53.6 kg/kWp 46.0 kg/kWp -7.6 kg/kWp for DH96NE.A-470
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 15 yrs 15 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 - Not published by DAS Solar
Bifacial Yes No Yes vs No
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#1,919 vs #716
DH96NE.A-470 leads by 1,203 places
Power density
#2,018 vs #674
DH96NE.A-470 leads by 1,344 places
Heat behaviour
#1,309 vs #1,309
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#7,566 vs #933
DH96NE.A-470 leads by 6,633 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#450 vs #6,325
DH132NC-715 leads by 5,875 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
DAS Solar
DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-715 vs DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-710
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
DAS Solar
DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-715 vs DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-705
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
DAS Solar
DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-715 vs DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-700
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
DAS Solar
DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-715 vs DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-695
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
DAS Solar
DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-715 vs DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-650W
9 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
DAS Solar
DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-715 vs DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-645W
9 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-715 or DAS Solar DAS-DH96NE.A-470?
According to our database: DAS Solar DAS-DH96NE.A-470 has higher module efficiency (23.50% vs 23.00%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-715 and DAS Solar DAS-DH96NE.A-470?
DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-715 has a module efficiency of 23.00%, while DAS Solar DAS-DH96NE.A-470 is 23.50%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-715 use vs DAS Solar DAS-DH96NE.A-470?
DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-715 uses TOPCon cells; DAS Solar DAS-DH96NE.A-470 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-715 and DAS Solar DAS-DH96NE.A-470?
DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-715 has a 30 years power warranty; DAS Solar DAS-DH96NE.A-470 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-715 and DAS Solar DAS-DH96NE.A-470 bifacial panels?
DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-715 is bifacial (captures light from both faces); DAS Solar DAS-DH96NE.A-470 is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.

Shop prices: See 4 DAS Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.