Skip to main content
DH132NC-705 vs DH132NE-650W 10 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-705 vs DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-650W

DAS Solar
DAS-DH132NC-705
705 Wp 22.70 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-650W
DAS Solar
DAS-DH132NE-650W
650 Wp 24.10 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

DH132NE-650W leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 1.40 pp more efficient. 10 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 9 differences
How alike are they
10 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

9 of 19 parameters
Parameter DH132NC-705 DH132NE-650W Difference
Module efficiency 22.70 % 24.10 % 1.40 pp more efficient
Rated power 705 Wp 650 Wp 55 W more power
Power density 227.0 Wp/m² 240.6 Wp/m² 13.7 Wp/m² higher
Weight 38.3 kg 31.9 kg 6.4 kg lighter
Module area 3.106 m² 2.701 m² 0.405 m² apart
Weight per kWp 54.3 kg/kWp 49.1 kg/kWp 5.2 kg/kWp lighter
Short-circuit current 18.38 A 16.47 A 1.91 A apart
Current at max power 17.36 A 15.67 A 1.69 A apart
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 2382x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm vs 2382x1134x30 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.280 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
DH132NC-705
23,654 kWh
DH132NE-650W
21,809 kWh
Lifetime gap
1,845 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario DH132NC-705 DH132NE-650W
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 705 W 650 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.8% of rated power 675 W 623 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.6% of rated power 646 W 595 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.4% of rated power 616 W 568 W
03

Full specification

Parameter DH132NC-705 DH132NE-650W Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 705 Wp 650 Wp +55 W for DH132NC-705
Module efficiency 22.70 % 24.10 % +1.40 pp for DH132NE-650W
Power density 227.0 Wp/m² 240.6 Wp/m² +13.7 Wp/m² for DH132NE-650W
Open-circuit voltage 48.72 V 49.38 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 40.62 V 41.49 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 18.38 A 16.47 A 1.91 A apart
Current at max power 17.36 A 15.67 A 1.69 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.280 %/°C -0.280 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 2382x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm vs 2382x1134x30 mm
Module area 3.106 m² 2.701 m² 0.405 m² apart
Weight 38.3 kg 31.9 kg -6.4 kg for DH132NE-650W
Weight per kWp 54.3 kg/kWp 49.1 kg/kWp -5.2 kg/kWp for DH132NE-650W
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 15 yrs 15 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#3,307 vs #219
DH132NE-650W leads by 3,088 places
Power density
#3,361 vs #233
DH132NE-650W leads by 3,128 places
Heat behaviour
#1,309 vs #1,309
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#8,604 vs #2,720
DH132NE-650W leads by 5,884 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#747 vs #878
DH132NC-705 leads by 131 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
DAS Solar
DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-705 vs DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-715
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
DAS Solar
DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-705 vs DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-710
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
DAS Solar
DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-705 vs DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-700
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
DAS Solar
DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-705 vs DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-695
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
DAS Solar
DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-705 vs DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-645W
9 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
DAS Solar
DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-705 vs DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-640W
9 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-705 or DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-650W?
According to our database: DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-650 W has higher module efficiency (24.10% vs 22.70%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-705 and DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-650W?
DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-705 has a module efficiency of 22.70%, while DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-650 W is 24.10%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-705 use vs DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-650W?
DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-705 uses TOPCon cells; DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-650 W uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-705 and DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-650W?
DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-705 has a 30 years power warranty; DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-650 W has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-705 and DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-650W bifacial panels?
Both DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-705 and DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-650 W are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 4 DAS Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.