DAS Solar DAS-DH120ND-495W vs DAS Solar DAS-DH120NA-485
VS
The verdict
DH120NA-485 leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 0.60 pp more efficient. 8 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.
See all 10 differencesHow alike are they
8
of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
not published
01
10 of 18 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
DH120ND-495W
DH120NA-485
Difference
Module efficiency
21.90 %
22.50 %
0.60 pp more efficient
Temperature coefficient
-0.280 %/°C
-0.300 %/°C
0.020 %/°C better in heat
Module area
2.261 m²
2.158 m²
0.103 m² apart
Power density
218.9 Wp/m²
224.7 Wp/m²
5.8 Wp/m² higher
Weight
27.5 kg
26.0 kg
1.5 kg lighter
Rated power
495 Wp
485 Wp
10 W more power
Short-circuit current
14.60 A
13.95 A
0.65 A apart
Dimensions
1994x1134x30 mm
1903x1134x30 mm
1994x1134x30 mm vs 1903x1134x30 mm
Current at max power
13.86 A
13.20 A
0.66 A apart
Voltage at max power
35.72 V
36.75 V
1.03 V apart
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
DH120ND-495W
16,608 kWh
DH120NA-485
16,273 kWh
Lifetime gap
335 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
DH120ND-495W
DH120NA-485
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
495 W
485 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.5% of rated power
474 W
463 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.0% of rated power
453 W
441 W
Hot roof
70 °C
86.5% of rated power
433 W
420 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
DH120ND-495W
DH120NA-485
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
495 Wp
485 Wp
+10 W for DH120ND-495W
Module efficiency
21.90 %
22.50 %
+0.60 pp for DH120NA-485
Power density
218.9 Wp/m²
224.7 Wp/m²
+5.8 Wp/m² for DH120NA-485
Open-circuit voltage
42.91 V
43.18 V
Effectively the same
Voltage at max power
35.72 V
36.75 V
1.03 V apart
Short-circuit current
14.60 A
13.95 A
0.65 A apart
Current at max power
13.86 A
13.20 A
0.66 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.280 %/°C
-0.300 %/°C
+0.020 %/°C for DH120ND-495W
Mechanical
Dimensions
1994x1134x30 mm
1903x1134x30 mm
1994x1134x30 mm vs 1903x1134x30 mm
Module area
2.261 m²
2.158 m²
0.103 m² apart
Weight
27.5 kg
26.0 kg
-1.5 kg for DH120NA-485
Weight per kWp
55.6 kg/kWp
53.6 kg/kWp
Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
15 yrs
15 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
TOPCon
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
-
120
Not published by DAS Solar
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#6,783
vs
#4,222
DH120NA-485 leads by 2,561 places
Power density
#6,793
vs
#4,501
DH120NA-485 leads by 2,292 places
Heat behaviour
#1,309
vs
#6,093
DH120ND-495W leads by 4,784 places
Weight
#9,909
vs
#7,617
DH120NA-485 leads by 2,292 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#7,591
vs
#7,185
DH120NA-485 leads by 406 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
DAS Solar
DAS Solar DAS-DH120ND-495W vs DAS Solar DAS-DH120ND-515W
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
DAS Solar
DAS Solar DAS-DH120ND-495W vs DAS Solar DAS-DH120ND-510W
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
DAS Solar
DAS Solar DAS-DH120ND-495W vs DAS Solar DAS-DH120ND-505W
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
DAS Solar
DAS Solar DAS-DH120ND-495W vs DAS Solar DAS-DH120ND-500W
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
DAS Solar
DAS Solar DAS-DH120ND-495W vs DAS Solar DAS-DH120NA-490
10 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
DAS Solar
DAS Solar DAS-DH120ND-495W vs DAS Solar DAS-DH120ND-490W
One difference: module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: DAS Solar DAS-DH120ND-495W or DAS Solar DAS-DH120NA-485?
According to our database: DAS Solar DAS-DH120NA-485 has higher module efficiency (22.50% vs 21.90%); DAS Solar DAS-DH120ND-495 W tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.280%/°C vs -0.300%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of DAS Solar DAS-DH120ND-495W and DAS Solar DAS-DH120NA-485?
DAS Solar DAS-DH120ND-495 W has a module efficiency of 21.90%, while DAS Solar DAS-DH120NA-485 is 22.50%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does DAS Solar DAS-DH120ND-495W use vs DAS Solar DAS-DH120NA-485?
DAS Solar DAS-DH120ND-495 W uses TOPCon cells; DAS Solar DAS-DH120NA-485 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on DAS Solar DAS-DH120ND-495W and DAS Solar DAS-DH120NA-485?
DAS Solar DAS-DH120ND-495 W has a 30 years power warranty; DAS Solar DAS-DH120NA-485 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are DAS Solar DAS-DH120ND-495W and DAS Solar DAS-DH120NA-485 bifacial panels?
Both DAS Solar DAS-DH120ND-495 W and DAS Solar DAS-DH120NA-485 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 4 DAS Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.