Skip to main content
DH120NA-485 vs DH120ND-490W 8 of 18 identical Swap Change panels

DAS Solar DAS-DH120NA-485 vs DAS Solar DAS-DH120ND-490W

DAS Solar
DAS-DH120NA-485
485 Wp 22.50 % TOPCon Bifacial
VS
DAS Solar
DAS-DH120ND-490W
490 Wp 21.70 % TOPCon Bifacial
The verdict

DH120NA-485 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.80 pp more efficient. 8 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.

See all 10 differences
How alike are they
8 of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs not published
01

What actually differs

10 of 18 parameters
Parameter DH120NA-485 DH120ND-490W Difference
Module efficiency 22.50 % 21.70 % 0.80 pp more efficient
Power density 224.7 Wp/m² 216.7 Wp/m² 8.0 Wp/m² higher
Temperature coefficient -0.300 %/°C -0.280 %/°C 0.020 %/°C better in heat
Module area 2.158 m² 2.261 m² 0.103 m² apart
Weight 26.0 kg 27.5 kg 1.5 kg lighter
Weight per kWp 53.6 kg/kWp 56.1 kg/kWp 2.5 kg/kWp lighter
Short-circuit current 13.95 A 14.54 A 0.59 A apart
Dimensions 1903x1134x30 mm 1994x1134x30 mm 1903x1134x30 mm vs 1994x1134x30 mm
Voltage at max power 36.75 V 35.51 V 1.24 V apart
Current at max power 13.20 A 13.80 A 0.60 A apart
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
DH120NA-485
16,273 kWh
DH120ND-490W
16,440 kWh
Lifetime gap
167 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario DH120NA-485 DH120ND-490W
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 485 W 490 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.5% of rated power 463 W 469 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.0% of rated power 441 W 449 W
Hot roof 70 °C 86.5% of rated power 420 W 428 W
03

Full specification

Parameter DH120NA-485 DH120ND-490W Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 485 Wp 490 Wp Effectively the same
Module efficiency 22.50 % 21.70 % +0.80 pp for DH120NA-485
Power density 224.7 Wp/m² 216.7 Wp/m² +8.0 Wp/m² for DH120NA-485
Open-circuit voltage 43.18 V 42.71 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 36.75 V 35.51 V 1.24 V apart
Short-circuit current 13.95 A 14.54 A 0.59 A apart
Current at max power 13.20 A 13.80 A 0.60 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.300 %/°C -0.280 %/°C +0.020 %/°C for DH120ND-490W
Mechanical
Dimensions 1903x1134x30 mm 1994x1134x30 mm 1903x1134x30 mm vs 1994x1134x30 mm
Module area 2.158 m² 2.261 m² 0.103 m² apart
Weight 26.0 kg 27.5 kg -1.5 kg for DH120NA-485
Weight per kWp 53.6 kg/kWp 56.1 kg/kWp -2.5 kg/kWp for DH120NA-485
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 15 yrs 15 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 120 - Not published by DAS Solar
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#4,222 vs #7,421
DH120NA-485 leads by 3,199 places
Power density
#4,501 vs #7,535
DH120NA-485 leads by 3,034 places
Heat behaviour
#6,093 vs #1,309
DH120ND-490W leads by 4,784 places
Weight
#7,617 vs #10,397
DH120NA-485 leads by 2,780 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#7,185 vs #8,038
DH120NA-485 leads by 853 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
DAS Solar
DAS Solar DAS-DH120NA-485 vs DAS Solar DAS-DH120ND-515W
9 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
DAS Solar
DAS Solar DAS-DH120NA-485 vs DAS Solar DAS-DH120ND-510W
7 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
DAS Solar
DAS Solar DAS-DH120NA-485 vs DAS Solar DAS-DH120ND-505W
8 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient
Same series, other bin
DAS Solar
DAS Solar DAS-DH120NA-485 vs DAS Solar DAS-DH120ND-500W
9 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient
Same series, other bin
DAS Solar
DAS Solar DAS-DH120NA-485 vs DAS Solar DAS-DH120ND-495W
10 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
DAS Solar
DAS Solar DAS-DH120NA-485 vs DAS Solar DAS-DH120NA-490
One difference: module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: DAS Solar DAS-DH120NA-485 or DAS Solar DAS-DH120ND-490W?
According to our database: DAS Solar DAS-DH120NA-485 has higher module efficiency (22.50% vs 21.70%); DAS Solar DAS-DH120ND-490 W tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.280%/°C vs -0.300%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of DAS Solar DAS-DH120NA-485 and DAS Solar DAS-DH120ND-490W?
DAS Solar DAS-DH120NA-485 has a module efficiency of 22.50%, while DAS Solar DAS-DH120ND-490 W is 21.70%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does DAS Solar DAS-DH120NA-485 use vs DAS Solar DAS-DH120ND-490W?
DAS Solar DAS-DH120NA-485 uses TOPCon cells; DAS Solar DAS-DH120ND-490 W uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on DAS Solar DAS-DH120NA-485 and DAS Solar DAS-DH120ND-490W?
DAS Solar DAS-DH120NA-485 has a 30 years power warranty; DAS Solar DAS-DH120ND-490 W has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are DAS Solar DAS-DH120NA-485 and DAS Solar DAS-DH120ND-490W bifacial panels?
Both DAS Solar DAS-DH120NA-485 and DAS Solar DAS-DH120ND-490 W are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 4 DAS Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.