Skip to main content
DH108NA-445W vs DH108ND-445 7 of 18 identical Swap Change panels

DAS Solar DAS-DH108NA-445W vs DAS Solar DAS-DH108ND-445

DAS Solar
DAS-DH108NA-445W
445 Wp 22.80 % TOPCon Bifacial
VS
DAS Solar
DAS-DH108ND-445
445 Wp 21.80 % TOPCon Bifacial
The verdict

DH108NA-445W leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 1.00 pp more efficient. 7 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.

See all 11 differences
How alike are they
7 of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs not published
01

What actually differs

11 of 18 parameters
Parameter DH108NA-445W DH108ND-445 Difference
Module efficiency 22.80 % 21.80 % 1.00 pp more efficient
Power density 227.9 Wp/m² 218.0 Wp/m² 9.9 Wp/m² higher
Product warranty 15 yrs 25 yrs 10 yrs longer
Temperature coefficient -0.300 %/°C -0.280 %/°C 0.020 %/°C better in heat
Module area 1.953 m² 2.041 m² 0.088 m² apart
Weight per kWp 46.1 kg/kWp 48.8 kg/kWp 2.7 kg/kWp lighter
Weight 20.5 kg 21.7 kg 1.2 kg lighter
Short-circuit current 14.03 A 14.63 A 0.60 A apart
Dimensions 1722x1134x30 mm 1800x1134x30 mm 1722x1134x30 mm vs 1800x1134x30 mm
Voltage at max power 33.51 V 32.28 V 1.23 V apart
Current at max power 13.28 A 13.79 A 0.51 A apart
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
DH108NA-445W
14,931 kWh
DH108ND-445
14,931 kWh
Lifetime gap
No difference
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario DH108NA-445W DH108ND-445
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 445 W 445 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.5% of rated power 425 W 426 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.0% of rated power 405 W 408 W
Hot roof 70 °C 86.5% of rated power 385 W 389 W
03

Full specification

Parameter DH108NA-445W DH108ND-445 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 445 Wp 445 Wp Same
Module efficiency 22.80 % 21.80 % +1.00 pp for DH108NA-445W
Power density 227.9 Wp/m² 218.0 Wp/m² +9.9 Wp/m² for DH108NA-445W
Open-circuit voltage 39.12 V 39.00 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 33.51 V 32.28 V 1.23 V apart
Short-circuit current 14.03 A 14.63 A 0.60 A apart
Current at max power 13.28 A 13.79 A 0.51 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.300 %/°C -0.280 %/°C +0.020 %/°C for DH108ND-445
Mechanical
Dimensions 1722x1134x30 mm 1800x1134x30 mm 1722x1134x30 mm vs 1800x1134x30 mm
Module area 1.953 m² 2.041 m² 0.088 m² apart
Weight 20.5 kg 21.7 kg -1.2 kg for DH108NA-445W
Weight per kWp 46.1 kg/kWp 48.8 kg/kWp -2.7 kg/kWp for DH108NA-445W
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 15 yrs 25 yrs +10 yrs for DH108ND-445
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count - 108 Not published by DAS Solar
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#2,714 vs #7,022
DH108NA-445W leads by 4,308 places
Power density
#2,790 vs #7,007
DH108NA-445W leads by 4,217 places
Heat behaviour
#6,093 vs #1,309
DH108ND-445 leads by 4,784 places
Weight
#972 vs #2,451
DH108NA-445W leads by 1,479 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#8,114 vs #7,173
DH108ND-445 leads by 941 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
DAS Solar
DAS Solar DAS-DH108NA-445W vs DAS Solar DAS-DH108ND-460
9 differences, the largest is product warranty
Same series, other bin
DAS Solar
DAS Solar DAS-DH108NA-445W vs DAS Solar DAS-DH108ND-455
10 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
DAS Solar
DAS Solar DAS-DH108NA-445W vs DAS Solar DAS-DH108ND-450
11 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
DAS Solar
DAS Solar DAS-DH108NA-445W vs DAS Solar DAS-DH108ND-440
10 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
DAS Solar
DAS Solar DAS-DH108NA-445W vs DAS Solar DAS-DH108NA-440W
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
DAS Solar
DAS Solar DAS-DH108NA-445W vs DAS Solar DAS-DH108NA-435
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: DAS Solar DAS-DH108NA-445W or DAS Solar DAS-DH108ND-445?
According to our database: DAS Solar DAS-DH108NA-445 W has higher module efficiency (22.80% vs 21.80%); DAS Solar DAS-DH108ND-445 tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.280%/°C vs -0.300%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of DAS Solar DAS-DH108NA-445W and DAS Solar DAS-DH108ND-445?
DAS Solar DAS-DH108NA-445 W has a module efficiency of 22.80%, while DAS Solar DAS-DH108ND-445 is 21.80%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does DAS Solar DAS-DH108NA-445W use vs DAS Solar DAS-DH108ND-445?
DAS Solar DAS-DH108NA-445 W uses TOPCon cells; DAS Solar DAS-DH108ND-445 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on DAS Solar DAS-DH108NA-445W and DAS Solar DAS-DH108ND-445?
DAS Solar DAS-DH108NA-445 W has a 30 years power warranty; DAS Solar DAS-DH108ND-445 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are DAS Solar DAS-DH108NA-445W and DAS Solar DAS-DH108ND-445 bifacial panels?
Both DAS Solar DAS-DH108NA-445 W and DAS Solar DAS-DH108ND-445 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 4 DAS Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.