Skip to main content
DH108NA-440W vs DH108ND-450 8 of 18 identical Swap Change panels

DAS Solar DAS-DH108NA-440W vs DAS Solar DAS-DH108ND-450

DAS Solar
DAS-DH108NA-440W
440 Wp 22.50 % TOPCon Bifacial
VS
DAS Solar
DAS-DH108ND-450
450 Wp 22.00 % TOPCon Bifacial
The verdict

10 differences, and they point both ways

The largest is module efficiency: 0.50 pp more efficient. 8 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.

See all 10 differences
How alike are they
8 of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs not published
01

What actually differs

10 of 18 parameters
Parameter DH108NA-440W DH108ND-450 Difference
Module efficiency 22.50 % 22.00 % 0.50 pp more efficient
Product warranty 15 yrs 25 yrs 10 yrs longer
Temperature coefficient -0.300 %/°C -0.280 %/°C 0.020 %/°C better in heat
Module area 1.953 m² 2.041 m² 0.088 m² apart
Power density 225.3 Wp/m² 220.5 Wp/m² 4.9 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 440 Wp 450 Wp 10 W more power
Weight 20.5 kg 21.7 kg 1.2 kg lighter
Short-circuit current 13.98 A 14.68 A 0.70 A apart
Dimensions 1722x1134x30 mm 1800x1134x30 mm 1722x1134x30 mm vs 1800x1134x30 mm
Current at max power 13.23 A 13.86 A 0.63 A apart
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
DH108NA-440W
14,763 kWh
DH108ND-450
15,098 kWh
Lifetime gap
335 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario DH108NA-440W DH108ND-450
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 440 W 450 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.5% of rated power 420 W 431 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.0% of rated power 400 W 412 W
Hot roof 70 °C 86.5% of rated power 381 W 393 W
03

Full specification

Parameter DH108NA-440W DH108ND-450 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 440 Wp 450 Wp +10 W for DH108ND-450
Module efficiency 22.50 % 22.00 % +0.50 pp for DH108NA-440W
Power density 225.3 Wp/m² 220.5 Wp/m² +4.9 Wp/m² for DH108NA-440W
Open-circuit voltage 38.88 V 39.18 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 33.26 V 32.47 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 13.98 A 14.68 A 0.70 A apart
Current at max power 13.23 A 13.86 A 0.63 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.300 %/°C -0.280 %/°C +0.020 %/°C for DH108ND-450
Mechanical
Dimensions 1722x1134x30 mm 1800x1134x30 mm 1722x1134x30 mm vs 1800x1134x30 mm
Module area 1.953 m² 2.041 m² 0.088 m² apart
Weight 20.5 kg 21.7 kg -1.2 kg for DH108NA-440W
Weight per kWp 46.6 kg/kWp 48.2 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 15 yrs 25 yrs +10 yrs for DH108ND-450
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count - 108 Not published by DAS Solar
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#4,222 vs #6,517
DH108NA-440W leads by 2,295 places
Power density
#4,099 vs #6,236
DH108NA-440W leads by 2,137 places
Heat behaviour
#6,093 vs #1,309
DH108ND-450 leads by 4,784 places
Weight
#1,235 vs #2,116
DH108NA-440W leads by 881 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#8,664 vs #6,746
DH108ND-450 leads by 1,918 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
DAS Solar
DAS Solar DAS-DH108NA-440W vs DAS Solar DAS-DH108ND-460
8 differences, the largest is product warranty
Same series, other bin
DAS Solar
DAS Solar DAS-DH108NA-440W vs DAS Solar DAS-DH108ND-455
9 differences, the largest is product warranty
Same series, other bin
DAS Solar
DAS Solar DAS-DH108NA-440W vs DAS Solar DAS-DH108ND-445
10 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
DAS Solar
DAS Solar DAS-DH108NA-440W vs DAS Solar DAS-DH108NA-445W
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
DAS Solar
DAS Solar DAS-DH108NA-440W vs DAS Solar DAS-DH108ND-440
10 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
DAS Solar
DAS Solar DAS-DH108NA-440W vs DAS Solar DAS-DH108NA-435
2 differences, the largest is product warranty
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: DAS Solar DAS-DH108NA-440W or DAS Solar DAS-DH108ND-450?
According to our database: DAS Solar DAS-DH108NA-440 W has higher module efficiency (22.50% vs 22.00%); DAS Solar DAS-DH108ND-450 tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.280%/°C vs -0.300%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of DAS Solar DAS-DH108NA-440W and DAS Solar DAS-DH108ND-450?
DAS Solar DAS-DH108NA-440 W has a module efficiency of 22.50%, while DAS Solar DAS-DH108ND-450 is 22.00%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does DAS Solar DAS-DH108NA-440W use vs DAS Solar DAS-DH108ND-450?
DAS Solar DAS-DH108NA-440 W uses TOPCon cells; DAS Solar DAS-DH108ND-450 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on DAS Solar DAS-DH108NA-440W and DAS Solar DAS-DH108ND-450?
DAS Solar DAS-DH108NA-440 W has a 30 years power warranty; DAS Solar DAS-DH108ND-450 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are DAS Solar DAS-DH108NA-440W and DAS Solar DAS-DH108ND-450 bifacial panels?
Both DAS Solar DAS-DH108NA-440 W and DAS Solar DAS-DH108ND-450 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 4 DAS Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.