Skip to main content
78X16/DG-640W vs 66Y18/DG-715 8 of 18 identical Swap Change panels

DAH Solar DHN-78X16/DG-640W vs DAH Solar DHN-66Y18/DG-715

DAH Solar
DHN-78X16/DG-640W
640 Wp 22.90 % TOPCon Bifacial Incomplete
VS
DAH Solar
DHN-66Y18/DG-715
715 Wp 23.02 % TOPCon Bifacial
The verdict

66Y18/DG-715 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is rated power: 75 W more power. 8 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.

See all 10 differences
How alike are they
8 of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs not published
01

What actually differs

10 of 18 parameters
Parameter 78X16/DG-640W 66Y18/DG-715 Difference
Rated power 640 Wp 715 Wp 75 W more power
Open-circuit voltage 56.40 V 48.20 V 8.20 V apart
Short-circuit current 14.32 A 18.67 A 4.35 A apart
Module area 2.795 m² 3.106 m² 0.311 m² apart
Weight 34.2 kg 36.7 kg 2.5 kg lighter
Voltage at max power 47.60 V 40.60 V 7.00 V apart
Current at max power 13.45 A 17.61 A 4.16 A apart
Cell count 156 132 24 cells apart
Weight per kWp 53.4 kg/kWp 51.3 kg/kWp 2.1 kg/kWp lighter
Dimensions 2465x1134x34 mm 2384x1303x33 mm 2465x1134x34 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
A 1.0% first-year loss then 0.40% a year, assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
78X16/DG-640W
21,473 kWh
66Y18/DG-715
23,990 kWh
Lifetime gap
2,517 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 78X16/DG-640W 66Y18/DG-715
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 640 W 715 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 612 W 684 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 584 W 653 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 556 W 622 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 78X16/DG-640W 66Y18/DG-715 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 640 Wp 715 Wp +75 W for 66Y18/DG-715
Module efficiency 22.90 % 23.02 % Effectively the same
Power density 229.0 Wp/m² 230.2 Wp/m² Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage 56.40 V 48.20 V 8.20 V apart
Voltage at max power 47.60 V 40.60 V 7.00 V apart
Short-circuit current 14.32 A 18.67 A 4.35 A apart
Current at max power 13.45 A 17.61 A 4.16 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2465x1134x34 mm 2384x1303x33 mm 2465x1134x34 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
Module area 2.795 m² 3.106 m² 0.311 m² apart
Weight 34.2 kg 36.7 kg -2.5 kg for 78X16/DG-640W
Weight per kWp 53.4 kg/kWp 51.3 kg/kWp -2.1 kg/kWp for 66Y18/DG-715
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 15 yrs 15 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation - 0.40 %/yr Not published by DAH Solar
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 156 132 24 cells apart
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#2,359 vs #1,797
66Y18/DG-715 leads by 562 places
Power density
#2,389 vs #2,018
66Y18/DG-715 leads by 371 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165 vs #2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#7,363 vs #4,703
66Y18/DG-715 leads by 2,660 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#1,704 vs #439
66Y18/DG-715 leads by 1,265 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
DAH Solar
DAH Solar DHN-78X16/DG-640W vs DAH Solar DHN-78X16/DG-635W
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
DAH Solar
DAH Solar DHN-78X16/DG-640W vs DAH Solar DHN-78X16/DG-630W
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
DAH Solar
DAH Solar DHN-78X16/DG-640W vs DAH Solar DHN-78X16/DG-625W
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
DAH Solar
DAH Solar DHN-78X16/DG-640W vs DAH Solar DHN-78X16/DG-620W
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
DAH Solar
DAH Solar DHN-66Y18/DG-715 vs DAH Solar DHN-66Y18/DG-725
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
DAH Solar
DAH Solar DHN-66Y18/DG-715 vs DAH Solar DHN-66Y18/DG-720
The same specification on paper
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: DAH Solar DHN-78X16/DG-640W or DAH Solar DHN-66Y18/DG-715?
According to our database: DAH Solar DHN-66Y18/DG-715 has higher module efficiency (23.02% vs 22.90%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of DAH Solar DHN-78X16/DG-640W and DAH Solar DHN-66Y18/DG-715?
DAH Solar DHN-78X16/DG-640 W has a module efficiency of 22.90%, while DAH Solar DHN-66Y18/DG-715 is 23.02%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does DAH Solar DHN-78X16/DG-640W use vs DAH Solar DHN-66Y18/DG-715?
DAH Solar DHN-78X16/DG-640 W uses TOPCon cells; DAH Solar DHN-66Y18/DG-715 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on DAH Solar DHN-78X16/DG-640W and DAH Solar DHN-66Y18/DG-715?
DAH Solar DHN-78X16/DG-640 W has a 30 years power warranty; DAH Solar DHN-66Y18/DG-715 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are DAH Solar DHN-78X16/DG-640W and DAH Solar DHN-66Y18/DG-715 bifacial panels?
Both DAH Solar DHN-78X16/DG-640 W and DAH Solar DHN-66Y18/DG-715 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 11 DAH Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.