605W vs 595W 15 of 18 identical Swap Change panels

DAH Solar DHN-66Z20/DG(BW)-605W vs DAH Solar DHN-66Z20/DG(BW)-595W

Q: Which panel is better: DAH Solar DHN-66Z20/DG(BW)-605W or DAH Solar DHN-66Z20/DG(BW)-595W?

According to our database: DAH Solar DHN-66Z20/DG(BW)-605W has higher module efficiency (22.40% vs 22.03%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.

Q: What is the efficiency of DAH Solar DHN-66Z20/DG(BW)-605W and DAH Solar DHN-66Z20/DG(BW)-595W?

DAH Solar DHN-66Z20/DG(BW)-605W has a module efficiency of 22.40%, while DAH Solar DHN-66Z20/DG(BW)-595W is 22.03%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.

Q: What cell technology does DAH Solar DHN-66Z20/DG(BW)-605W use vs DAH Solar DHN-66Z20/DG(BW)-595W?

DAH Solar DHN-66Z20/DG(BW)-605W uses TOPCon cells; DAH Solar DHN-66Z20/DG(BW)-595W uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.

Q: What is the warranty on DAH Solar DHN-66Z20/DG(BW)-605W and DAH Solar DHN-66Z20/DG(BW)-595W?

DAH Solar DHN-66Z20/DG(BW)-605W has a 30 years power warranty; DAH Solar DHN-66Z20/DG(BW)-595W has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.

Q: Are DAH Solar DHN-66Z20/DG(BW)-605W and DAH Solar DHN-66Z20/DG(BW)-595W bifacial panels?

Both DAH Solar DHN-66Z20/DG(BW)-605W and DAH Solar DHN-66Z20/DG(BW)-595W are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

DAH Solar

DHN-66Z20/DG(BW)-605W

605 Wp 22.40 % TOPCon Bifacial Incomplete

Open panel page Datasheet PDF

DAH Solar

DHN-66Z20/DG(BW)-595W

595 Wp 22.03 % TOPCon Bifacial Incomplete

Open panel page Datasheet PDF

The verdict

605W leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.37 pp more efficient. 15 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.

See all 3 differences

How alike are they

15 of 18 comparable
parameters are identical

identical differs not published

What actually differs

3 of 18 parameters

Parameter 605W 595W Difference

Module efficiency 22.40 % 22.03 % 0.37 pp more efficient

Power density 224.0 Wp/m² 220.3 Wp/m² 3.7 Wp/m² higher

Rated power 605 Wp 595 Wp 10 W more power

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production

Declared first-year losses, with 0.40% a year afterwards assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year

Cell temperature

Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.

605W

20,299 kWh

595W

19,963 kWh

Lifetime gap

336 kWh

Output when it is hot

Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees

Scenario 605W 595W

Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 605 W 595 W

Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 579 W 569 W

Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 552 W 543 W

Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 526 W 517 W

Full specification

Parameter 605W 595W Difference

Power and efficiency

Rated power 605 Wp 595 Wp +10 W for 605W

Module efficiency 22.40 % 22.03 % +0.37 pp for 605W

Power density 224.0 Wp/m² 220.3 Wp/m² +3.7 Wp/m² for 605W

Open-circuit voltage 47.60 V 47.40 V Effectively the same

Voltage at max power 40.30 V 40.10 V Effectively the same

Short-circuit current 15.67 A 15.64 A Effectively the same

Current at max power 14.81 A 14.77 A Effectively the same

Temperature

Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same

Mechanical

Dimensions 2382x1134x30 mm 2382x1134x30 mm Same

Module area 2.701 m² 2.701 m² Same

Weight 32.5 kg 32.5 kg Same

Weight per kWp 53.7 kg/kWp 54.6 kg/kWp Effectively the same

Warranty and degradation

Product warranty 15 yrs 15 yrs Same

Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same

Annual degradation - - Neither datasheet publishes this

Technology

Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same

Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same

Cell count 132 132 Same

Bifacial Yes Yes Same

Against the whole database

14,005 panels

Efficiency

#4,774 vs #6,306

605W leads by 1,532 places

Power density

#4,780 vs #6,299

605W leads by 1,519 places

Heat behaviour

#2,165 vs #2,165

Tied - the same position in the database

Weight

#7,739 vs #8,977

605W leads by 1,238 places

Warranty

#21 vs #21

Tied - the same position in the database

Overall

#3,064 vs #3,905

605W leads by 841 places

More useful comparisons

Open the full database

Same series, other bin

DAH Solar

DAH Solar DHN-66Z20/DG(BW)-605W vs DAH Solar DHN-66Z20/DG(BW)-625W

3 differences, the largest is module efficiency

Same series, other bin

DAH Solar

DAH Solar DHN-66Z20/DG(BW)-605W vs DAH Solar DHN-66Z20/DG(BW)-620W

3 differences, the largest is module efficiency

Same series, other bin

DAH Solar

DAH Solar DHN-66Z20/DG(BW)-605W vs DAH Solar DHN-66Z20/DG(BW)-615W

3 differences, the largest is module efficiency

Same series, other bin

DAH Solar

DAH Solar DHN-66Z20/DG(BW)-605W vs DAH Solar DHN-66Z20/DG(BW)-610W

The same specification on paper

Same series, other bin

DAH Solar

DAH Solar DHN-66Z20/DG(BW)-605W vs DAH Solar DHN-66Z20/DG(BW)-600W

The same specification on paper

Same series, other bin

DAH Solar

DAH Solar DHN-66Z20/DG(BW)-605W vs DAH Solar DHN-66Z20/DG(BW)-590W

3 differences, the largest is module efficiency

Written summary

Checking cache...

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: DAH Solar DHN-66Z20/DG(BW)-605W or DAH Solar DHN-66Z20/DG(BW)-595W?

According to our database: DAH Solar DHN-66Z20/DG(BW)-605 W has higher module efficiency (22.40% vs 22.03%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.

What is the efficiency of DAH Solar DHN-66Z20/DG(BW)-605W and DAH Solar DHN-66Z20/DG(BW)-595W?

DAH Solar DHN-66Z20/DG(BW)-605 W has a module efficiency of 22.40%, while DAH Solar DHN-66Z20/DG(BW)-595 W is 22.03%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.

What cell technology does DAH Solar DHN-66Z20/DG(BW)-605W use vs DAH Solar DHN-66Z20/DG(BW)-595W?

DAH Solar DHN-66Z20/DG(BW)-605 W uses TOPCon cells; DAH Solar DHN-66Z20/DG(BW)-595 W uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.

What is the warranty on DAH Solar DHN-66Z20/DG(BW)-605W and DAH Solar DHN-66Z20/DG(BW)-595W?

DAH Solar DHN-66Z20/DG(BW)-605 W has a 30 years power warranty; DAH Solar DHN-66Z20/DG(BW)-595 W has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.

Are DAH Solar DHN-66Z20/DG(BW)-605W and DAH Solar DHN-66Z20/DG(BW)-595W bifacial panels?

Both DAH Solar DHN-66Z20/DG(BW)-605 W and DAH Solar DHN-66Z20/DG(BW)-595 W are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 12 DAH Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.