Skip to main content
600W vs 615W 15 of 18 identical Swap Change panels

DAH Solar DHN-66Z20/DG(BW)-600W vs DAH Solar DHN-66Z20/DG(BW)-615W

DAH Solar
DHN-66Z20/DG(BW)-600W
600 Wp 22.21 % TOPCon Bifacial Incomplete
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
DAH Solar
DHN-66Z20/DG(BW)-615W
615 Wp 22.77 % TOPCon Bifacial Incomplete
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

615W leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.56 pp more efficient. 15 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.

See all 3 differences
How alike are they
15 of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs not published
01

What actually differs

3 of 18 parameters
Parameter 600W 615W Difference
Module efficiency 22.21 % 22.77 % 0.56 pp more efficient
Power density 222.1 Wp/m² 227.7 Wp/m² 5.6 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 600 Wp 615 Wp 15 W more power
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Declared first-year losses, with 0.40% a year afterwards assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
600W
20,131 kWh
615W
20,634 kWh
Lifetime gap
503 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 600W 615W
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 600 W 615 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 574 W 588 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 548 W 561 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 522 W 535 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 600W 615W Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 600 Wp 615 Wp +15 W for 615W
Module efficiency 22.21 % 22.77 % +0.56 pp for 615W
Power density 222.1 Wp/m² 227.7 Wp/m² +5.6 Wp/m² for 615W
Open-circuit voltage 47.60 V 48.00 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 40.10 V 40.60 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 15.64 A 15.72 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 14.80 A 14.91 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2382x1134x30 mm 2382x1134x30 mm Same
Module area 2.701 m² 2.701 m² Same
Weight 32.5 kg 32.5 kg Same
Weight per kWp 54.2 kg/kWp 52.8 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 15 yrs 15 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation - - Neither datasheet publishes this
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#5,754 vs #3,073
615W leads by 2,681 places
Power density
#5,783 vs #3,077
615W leads by 2,706 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165 vs #2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#8,370 vs #6,546
615W leads by 1,824 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#3,531 vs #2,365
615W leads by 1,166 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
DAH Solar
DAH Solar DHN-66Z20/DG(BW)-600W vs DAH Solar DHN-66Z20/DG(BW)-625W
5 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
DAH Solar
DAH Solar DHN-66Z20/DG(BW)-600W vs DAH Solar DHN-66Z20/DG(BW)-620W
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
DAH Solar
DAH Solar DHN-66Z20/DG(BW)-600W vs DAH Solar DHN-66Z20/DG(BW)-610W
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
DAH Solar
DAH Solar DHN-66Z20/DG(BW)-600W vs DAH Solar DHN-66Z20/DG(BW)-605W
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
DAH Solar
DAH Solar DHN-66Z20/DG(BW)-600W vs DAH Solar DHN-66Z20/DG(BW)-595W
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
DAH Solar
DAH Solar DHN-66Z20/DG(BW)-600W vs DAH Solar DHN-66Z20/DG(BW)-590W
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: DAH Solar DHN-66Z20/DG(BW)-600W or DAH Solar DHN-66Z20/DG(BW)-615W?
According to our database: DAH Solar DHN-66Z20/DG(BW)-615 W has higher module efficiency (22.77% vs 22.21%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of DAH Solar DHN-66Z20/DG(BW)-600W and DAH Solar DHN-66Z20/DG(BW)-615W?
DAH Solar DHN-66Z20/DG(BW)-600 W has a module efficiency of 22.21%, while DAH Solar DHN-66Z20/DG(BW)-615 W is 22.77%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does DAH Solar DHN-66Z20/DG(BW)-600W use vs DAH Solar DHN-66Z20/DG(BW)-615W?
DAH Solar DHN-66Z20/DG(BW)-600 W uses TOPCon cells; DAH Solar DHN-66Z20/DG(BW)-615 W uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on DAH Solar DHN-66Z20/DG(BW)-600W and DAH Solar DHN-66Z20/DG(BW)-615W?
DAH Solar DHN-66Z20/DG(BW)-600 W has a 30 years power warranty; DAH Solar DHN-66Z20/DG(BW)-615 W has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are DAH Solar DHN-66Z20/DG(BW)-600W and DAH Solar DHN-66Z20/DG(BW)-615W bifacial panels?
Both DAH Solar DHN-66Z20/DG(BW)-600 W and DAH Solar DHN-66Z20/DG(BW)-615 W are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 12 DAH Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.