Skip to main content
CS7N-645MB-AG vs CS7L-610MB-AG 9 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Canadian Solar CS7N-645MB-AG vs Canadian Solar CS7L-610MB-AG

Canadian Solar CS7N-645MB-AG
CS7N-645MB-AG
645 Wp 20.80 % PERC Bifacial
VS
Canadian Solar CS7L-610MB-AG
CS7L-610MB-AG
610 Wp 21.60 % PERC Bifacial
The verdict

CS7L-610MB-AG leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.80 pp more efficient. 9 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 10 differences
How alike are they
9 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

10 of 19 parameters
Parameter CS7N-645MB-AG CS7L-610MB-AG Difference
Module efficiency 20.80 % 21.60 % 0.80 pp more efficient
Rated power 645 Wp 610 Wp 35 W more power
Power density 207.6 Wp/m² 215.5 Wp/m² 7.9 Wp/m² higher
Weight 37.9 kg 34.5 kg 3.4 kg lighter
Module area 3.106 m² 2.830 m² 0.276 m² apart
Open-circuit voltage 44.80 V 41.70 V 3.10 V apart
Cell count 132 120 12 cells apart
Weight per kWp 58.8 kg/kWp 56.6 kg/kWp 2.2 kg/kWp lighter
Voltage at max power 37.70 V 35.30 V 2.40 V apart
Dimensions 2384x1303x35 mm 2172x1303x33 mm 2384x1303x35 mm vs 2172x1303x33 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.340 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
CS7N-645MB-AG
21,240 kWh
CS7L-610MB-AG
20,088 kWh
Lifetime gap
1,152 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario CS7N-645MB-AG CS7L-610MB-AG
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 645 W 610 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 94.9% of rated power 612 W 579 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 89.8% of rated power 579 W 548 W
Hot roof 70 °C 84.7% of rated power 546 W 517 W
03

Full specification

Parameter CS7N-645MB-AG CS7L-610MB-AG Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 645 Wp 610 Wp +35 W for CS7N-645MB-AG
Module efficiency 20.80 % 21.60 % +0.80 pp for CS7L-610MB-AG
Power density 207.6 Wp/m² 215.5 Wp/m² +7.9 Wp/m² for CS7L-610MB-AG
Open-circuit voltage 44.80 V 41.70 V 3.10 V apart
Voltage at max power 37.70 V 35.30 V 2.40 V apart
Short-circuit current 18.35 A 18.57 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 17.11 A 17.29 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.340 %/°C -0.340 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x35 mm 2172x1303x33 mm 2384x1303x35 mm vs 2172x1303x33 mm
Module area 3.106 m² 2.830 m² 0.276 m² apart
Weight 37.9 kg 34.5 kg -3.4 kg for CS7L-610MB-AG
Weight per kWp 58.8 kg/kWp 56.6 kg/kWp -2.2 kg/kWp for CS7L-610MB-AG
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.45 %/yr 0.45 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology PERC PERC Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 120 12 cells apart
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#10,457 vs #7,652
CS7L-610MB-AG leads by 2,805 places
Power density
#10,562 vs #7,727
CS7L-610MB-AG leads by 2,835 places
Heat behaviour
#8,778 vs #8,778
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#11,888 vs #10,713
CS7L-610MB-AG leads by 1,175 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#4,248 vs #4,491
CS7N-645MB-AG leads by 243 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Canadian Solar CS7N-645MB-AG vs Canadian Solar CS7N-670MB-AG
7 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Canadian Solar CS7N-645MB-AG vs Canadian Solar CS7N-665MB-AG
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Canadian Solar CS7N-645MB-AG vs Canadian Solar CS7N-660MB-AG
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Canadian Solar CS7N-645MB-AG vs Canadian Solar CS7N-655MB-AG
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Canadian Solar CS7N-645MB-AG vs Canadian Solar CS7N-650MB-AG
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Canadian Solar CS7N-645MB-AG vs Canadian Solar CS7N-640MB-AG
One difference: module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Canadian Solar CS7N-645MB-AG or Canadian Solar CS7L-610MB-AG?
According to our database: Canadian Solar CS7L-610MB-AG has higher module efficiency (21.60% vs 20.80%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Canadian Solar CS7N-645MB-AG and Canadian Solar CS7L-610MB-AG?
Canadian Solar CS7N-645MB-AG has a module efficiency of 20.80%, while Canadian Solar CS7L-610MB-AG is 21.60%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Canadian Solar CS7N-645MB-AG use vs Canadian Solar CS7L-610MB-AG?
Canadian Solar CS7N-645MB-AG uses PERC cells; Canadian Solar CS7L-610MB-AG uses PERC. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Canadian Solar CS7N-645MB-AG and Canadian Solar CS7L-610MB-AG?
Canadian Solar CS7N-645MB-AG has a 30 years power warranty; Canadian Solar CS7L-610MB-AG has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Canadian Solar CS7N-645MB-AG and Canadian Solar CS7L-610MB-AG bifacial panels?
Both Canadian Solar CS7N-645MB-AG and Canadian Solar CS7L-610MB-AG are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 38 Canadian Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.