Skip to main content
66TM-630 vs 48TD-455 5 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Canadian Solar CS6.2-66TM-630 vs Canadian Solar CS6.2-48TD-455

Canadian Solar CS6.2-66TM-630
CS6.2-66TM-630
630 Wp 23.30 % TOPCon
VS
Canadian Solar CS6.2-48TD-455
CS6.2-48TD-455
455 Wp 22.80 % TOPCon Bifacial
The verdict

66TM-630 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is rated power: 175 W more power. 5 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 14 differences
How alike are they
5 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

14 of 19 parameters
Parameter 66TM-630 48TD-455 Difference
Rated power 630 Wp 455 Wp 175 W more power
Module efficiency 23.30 % 22.80 % 0.50 pp more efficient
Weight per kWp 44.6 kg/kWp 54.1 kg/kWp 9.5 kg/kWp lighter
Product warranty 12 yrs 25 yrs 13 yrs longer
Weight 28.1 kg 24.6 kg 3.5 kg lighter
Open-circuit voltage 48.80 V 53.10 V 4.30 V apart
Short-circuit current 16.20 A 10.75 A 5.45 A apart
Module area 2.701 m² 1.998 m² 0.703 m² apart
Power density 233.2 Wp/m² 227.7 Wp/m² 5.5 Wp/m² higher
Current at max power 15.16 A 10.12 A 5.04 A apart
Cell count 132 144 12 cells apart
Voltage at max power 41.60 V 45.00 V 3.40 V apart
Bifacial No Yes No vs Yes
Dimensions 2382x1134x30 mm 1762x1134x30 mm 2382x1134x30 mm vs 1762x1134x30 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
66TM-630
21,138 kWh
48TD-455
15,266 kWh
Lifetime gap
5,872 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 66TM-630 48TD-455
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 630 W 455 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 603 W 435 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 575 W 415 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 548 W 396 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 66TM-630 48TD-455 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 630 Wp 455 Wp +175 W for 66TM-630
Module efficiency 23.30 % 22.80 % +0.50 pp for 66TM-630
Power density 233.2 Wp/m² 227.7 Wp/m² +5.5 Wp/m² for 66TM-630
Open-circuit voltage 48.80 V 53.10 V 4.30 V apart
Voltage at max power 41.60 V 45.00 V 3.40 V apart
Short-circuit current 16.20 A 10.75 A 5.45 A apart
Current at max power 15.16 A 10.12 A 5.04 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2382x1134x30 mm 1762x1134x30 mm 2382x1134x30 mm vs 1762x1134x30 mm
Module area 2.701 m² 1.998 m² 0.703 m² apart
Weight 28.1 kg 24.6 kg -3.5 kg for 48TD-455
Weight per kWp 44.6 kg/kWp 54.1 kg/kWp -9.5 kg/kWp for 66TM-630
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 25 yrs +13 yrs for 48TD-455
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 144 12 cells apart
Bifacial No Yes No vs Yes
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#1,017 vs #2,714
66TM-630 leads by 1,697 places
Power density
#1,003 vs #2,888
66TM-630 leads by 1,885 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165 vs #2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#485 vs #8,287
66TM-630 leads by 7,802 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#1,895 vs #5,669
66TM-630 leads by 3,774 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Canadian Solar CS6.2-66TM-630 vs Canadian Solar CS6.2-66TM-635
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Canadian Solar CS6.2-66TM-630 vs Canadian Solar CS6.2-66TM-625
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Canadian Solar CS6.2-66TM-630 vs Canadian Solar CS6.2-66TM-620
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Canadian Solar CS6.2-66TM-630 vs Canadian Solar CS6.2-66TM-615
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Canadian Solar CS6.2-66TM-630 vs Canadian Solar CS6.2-66TM-610
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Canadian Solar CS6.2-66TM-630 vs Canadian Solar CS6W-600T
8 differences, the largest is rated power
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Canadian Solar CS6.2-66TM-630 or Canadian Solar CS6.2-48TD-455?
According to our database: Canadian Solar CS6.2-66TM-630 has higher module efficiency (23.30% vs 22.80%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Canadian Solar CS6.2-66TM-630 and Canadian Solar CS6.2-48TD-455?
Canadian Solar CS6.2-66TM-630 has a module efficiency of 23.30%, while Canadian Solar CS6.2-48TD-455 is 22.80%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Canadian Solar CS6.2-66TM-630 use vs Canadian Solar CS6.2-48TD-455?
Canadian Solar CS6.2-66TM-630 uses TOPCon cells; Canadian Solar CS6.2-48TD-455 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Canadian Solar CS6.2-66TM-630 and Canadian Solar CS6.2-48TD-455?
Canadian Solar CS6.2-66TM-630 has a 30 years power warranty; Canadian Solar CS6.2-48TD-455 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Canadian Solar CS6.2-66TM-630 and Canadian Solar CS6.2-48TD-455 bifacial panels?
Canadian Solar CS6.2-48TD-455 is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Canadian Solar CS6.2-66TM-630 is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.

Shop prices: See 40 Canadian Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.