Skip to main content
66TM-620 vs 48TD-450 5 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Canadian Solar CS6.2-66TM-620 vs Canadian Solar CS6.2-48TD-450

Canadian Solar CS6.2-66TM-620
CS6.2-66TM-620
620 Wp 23.00 % TOPCon
VS
Canadian Solar CS6.2-48TD-450
CS6.2-48TD-450
450 Wp 22.50 % TOPCon Bifacial
The verdict

66TM-620 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is rated power: 170 W more power. 5 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 14 differences
How alike are they
5 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

14 of 19 parameters
Parameter 66TM-620 48TD-450 Difference
Rated power 620 Wp 450 Wp 170 W more power
Module efficiency 23.00 % 22.50 % 0.50 pp more efficient
Weight per kWp 45.3 kg/kWp 54.7 kg/kWp 9.3 kg/kWp lighter
Product warranty 12 yrs 25 yrs 13 yrs longer
Weight 28.1 kg 24.6 kg 3.5 kg lighter
Open-circuit voltage 48.40 V 52.90 V 4.50 V apart
Short-circuit current 16.08 A 10.68 A 5.40 A apart
Module area 2.701 m² 1.998 m² 0.703 m² apart
Power density 229.5 Wp/m² 225.2 Wp/m² 4.3 Wp/m² higher
Current at max power 15.06 A 10.05 A 5.01 A apart
Cell count 132 144 12 cells apart
Voltage at max power 41.20 V 44.80 V 3.60 V apart
Bifacial No Yes No vs Yes
Dimensions 2382x1134x30 mm 1762x1134x30 mm 2382x1134x30 mm vs 1762x1134x30 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
66TM-620
20,802 kWh
48TD-450
15,098 kWh
Lifetime gap
5,704 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 66TM-620 48TD-450
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 620 W 450 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 593 W 430 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 566 W 411 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 539 W 391 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 66TM-620 48TD-450 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 620 Wp 450 Wp +170 W for 66TM-620
Module efficiency 23.00 % 22.50 % +0.50 pp for 66TM-620
Power density 229.5 Wp/m² 225.2 Wp/m² +4.3 Wp/m² for 66TM-620
Open-circuit voltage 48.40 V 52.90 V 4.50 V apart
Voltage at max power 41.20 V 44.80 V 3.60 V apart
Short-circuit current 16.08 A 10.68 A 5.40 A apart
Current at max power 15.06 A 10.05 A 5.01 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2382x1134x30 mm 1762x1134x30 mm 2382x1134x30 mm vs 1762x1134x30 mm
Module area 2.701 m² 1.998 m² 0.703 m² apart
Weight 28.1 kg 24.6 kg -3.5 kg for 48TD-450
Weight per kWp 45.3 kg/kWp 54.7 kg/kWp -9.3 kg/kWp for 66TM-620
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 25 yrs +13 yrs for 48TD-450
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 144 12 cells apart
Bifacial No Yes No vs Yes
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#1,919 vs #4,222
66TM-620 leads by 2,303 places
Power density
#2,191 vs #4,225
66TM-620 leads by 2,034 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165 vs #2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#690 vs #9,063
66TM-620 leads by 8,373 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#2,436 vs #6,225
66TM-620 leads by 3,789 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Canadian Solar CS6.2-66TM-620 vs Canadian Solar CS6.2-66TM-635
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Canadian Solar CS6.2-66TM-620 vs Canadian Solar CS6.2-66TM-630
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Canadian Solar CS6.2-66TM-620 vs Canadian Solar CS6.2-66TM-625
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Canadian Solar CS6.2-66TM-620 vs Canadian Solar CS6.2-66TM-615
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Canadian Solar CS6.2-66TM-620 vs Canadian Solar CS6.2-66TM-610
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Canadian Solar CS6.2-66TM-620 vs Canadian Solar CS6W-600T
9 differences, the largest is rated power
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Canadian Solar CS6.2-66TM-620 or Canadian Solar CS6.2-48TD-450?
According to our database: Canadian Solar CS6.2-66TM-620 has higher module efficiency (23.00% vs 22.50%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Canadian Solar CS6.2-66TM-620 and Canadian Solar CS6.2-48TD-450?
Canadian Solar CS6.2-66TM-620 has a module efficiency of 23.00%, while Canadian Solar CS6.2-48TD-450 is 22.50%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Canadian Solar CS6.2-66TM-620 use vs Canadian Solar CS6.2-48TD-450?
Canadian Solar CS6.2-66TM-620 uses TOPCon cells; Canadian Solar CS6.2-48TD-450 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Canadian Solar CS6.2-66TM-620 and Canadian Solar CS6.2-48TD-450?
Canadian Solar CS6.2-66TM-620 has a 30 years power warranty; Canadian Solar CS6.2-48TD-450 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Canadian Solar CS6.2-66TM-620 and Canadian Solar CS6.2-48TD-450 bifacial panels?
Canadian Solar CS6.2-48TD-450 is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Canadian Solar CS6.2-66TM-620 is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.

Shop prices: See 38 Canadian Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.