Skip to main content
CS6.2-66TB-620 vs CS7N-730TB-AG 11 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Canadian Solar CS6.2-66TB-620 vs Canadian Solar CS7N-730TB-AG

Canadian Solar CS6.2-66TB-620
CS6.2-66TB-620
620 Wp 23.00 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
Canadian Solar CS7N-730TB-AG
CS7N-730TB-AG
730 Wp 23.50 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

CS7N-730TB-AG leads on the differences that matter

The largest is rated power: 110 W more power. 11 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 8 differences
How alike are they
11 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

8 of 19 parameters
Parameter CS6.2-66TB-620 CS7N-730TB-AG Difference
Rated power 620 Wp 730 Wp 110 W more power
Module efficiency 23.00 % 23.50 % 0.50 pp more efficient
Weight 32.8 kg 37.8 kg 5.0 kg lighter
Short-circuit current 16.08 A 18.79 A 2.71 A apart
Module area 2.701 m² 3.106 m² 0.405 m² apart
Power density 229.5 Wp/m² 235.0 Wp/m² 5.5 Wp/m² higher
Current at max power 15.06 A 17.75 A 2.69 A apart
Dimensions 2382x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm 2382x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
CS6.2-66TB-620
20,802 kWh
CS7N-730TB-AG
24,493 kWh
Lifetime gap
3,691 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario CS6.2-66TB-620 CS7N-730TB-AG
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 620 W 730 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 593 W 698 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 566 W 666 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 539 W 635 W
03

Full specification

Parameter CS6.2-66TB-620 CS7N-730TB-AG Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 620 Wp 730 Wp +110 W for CS7N-730TB-AG
Module efficiency 23.00 % 23.50 % +0.50 pp for CS7N-730TB-AG
Power density 229.5 Wp/m² 235.0 Wp/m² +5.5 Wp/m² for CS7N-730TB-AG
Open-circuit voltage 48.40 V 49.10 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 41.20 V 41.20 V Same
Short-circuit current 16.08 A 18.79 A 2.71 A apart
Current at max power 15.06 A 17.75 A 2.69 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2382x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm 2382x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
Module area 2.701 m² 3.106 m² 0.405 m² apart
Weight 32.8 kg 37.8 kg -5.0 kg for CS6.2-66TB-620
Weight per kWp 52.9 kg/kWp 51.8 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#1,919 vs #716
CS7N-730TB-AG leads by 1,203 places
Power density
#2,191 vs #800
CS7N-730TB-AG leads by 1,391 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165 vs #2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#6,617 vs #5,151
CS7N-730TB-AG leads by 1,466 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#2,525 vs #312
CS7N-730TB-AG leads by 2,213 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Canadian Solar CS6.2-66TB-620 vs Canadian Solar CS6.2-66TB-630
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Canadian Solar CS6.2-66TB-620 vs Canadian Solar CS6.2-66TB-625
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Canadian Solar CS6.2-66TB-620 vs Canadian Solar CS6.2-66TB-615
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Canadian Solar CS6.2-66TB-620 vs Canadian Solar CS6.2-66TB-610
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Canadian Solar CS6.2-66TB-620 vs Canadian Solar CS6.2-66TB-605
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Canadian Solar CS6.2-66TB-620 vs Canadian Solar CS6.2-66TB-600
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Canadian Solar CS6.2-66TB-620 or Canadian Solar CS7N-730TB-AG?
According to our database: Canadian Solar CS7N-730TB-AG has higher module efficiency (23.50% vs 23.00%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Canadian Solar CS6.2-66TB-620 and Canadian Solar CS7N-730TB-AG?
Canadian Solar CS6.2-66TB-620 has a module efficiency of 23.00%, while Canadian Solar CS7N-730TB-AG is 23.50%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Canadian Solar CS6.2-66TB-620 use vs Canadian Solar CS7N-730TB-AG?
Canadian Solar CS6.2-66TB-620 uses TOPCon cells; Canadian Solar CS7N-730TB-AG uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Canadian Solar CS6.2-66TB-620 and Canadian Solar CS7N-730TB-AG?
Canadian Solar CS6.2-66TB-620 has a 30 years power warranty; Canadian Solar CS7N-730TB-AG has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Canadian Solar CS6.2-66TB-620 and Canadian Solar CS7N-730TB-AG bifacial panels?
Both Canadian Solar CS6.2-66TB-620 and Canadian Solar CS7N-730TB-AG are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 39 Canadian Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.