Skip to main content
48TD-460 vs 66TM-610 5 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Canadian Solar CS6.2-48TD-460 vs Canadian Solar CS6.2-66TM-610

Canadian Solar CS6.2-48TD-460
CS6.2-48TD-460
460 Wp 23.00 % TOPCon Bifacial
VS
Canadian Solar CS6.2-66TM-610
CS6.2-66TM-610
610 Wp 22.60 % TOPCon
The verdict

14 differences, and they point both ways

The largest is rated power: 150 W more power. 5 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 14 differences
How alike are they
5 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

14 of 19 parameters
Parameter 48TD-460 66TM-610 Difference
Rated power 460 Wp 610 Wp 150 W more power
Product warranty 25 yrs 12 yrs 13 yrs longer
Weight per kWp 53.5 kg/kWp 46.1 kg/kWp 7.4 kg/kWp lighter
Weight 24.6 kg 28.1 kg 3.5 kg lighter
Module efficiency 23.00 % 22.60 % 0.40 pp more efficient
Open-circuit voltage 53.30 V 48.00 V 5.30 V apart
Short-circuit current 10.82 A 15.97 A 5.15 A apart
Module area 1.998 m² 2.701 m² 0.703 m² apart
Power density 230.2 Wp/m² 225.8 Wp/m² 4.4 Wp/m² higher
Voltage at max power 45.20 V 40.80 V 4.40 V apart
Current at max power 10.18 A 14.96 A 4.78 A apart
Cell count 144 132 12 cells apart
Bifacial Yes No Yes vs No
Dimensions 1762x1134x30 mm 2382x1134x30 mm 1762x1134x30 mm vs 2382x1134x30 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
48TD-460
15,434 kWh
66TM-610
20,467 kWh
Lifetime gap
5,033 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 48TD-460 66TM-610
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 460 W 610 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 440 W 583 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 420 W 557 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 400 W 530 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 48TD-460 66TM-610 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 460 Wp 610 Wp +150 W for 66TM-610
Module efficiency 23.00 % 22.60 % +0.40 pp for 48TD-460
Power density 230.2 Wp/m² 225.8 Wp/m² +4.4 Wp/m² for 48TD-460
Open-circuit voltage 53.30 V 48.00 V 5.30 V apart
Voltage at max power 45.20 V 40.80 V 4.40 V apart
Short-circuit current 10.82 A 15.97 A 5.15 A apart
Current at max power 10.18 A 14.96 A 4.78 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 1762x1134x30 mm 2382x1134x30 mm 1762x1134x30 mm vs 2382x1134x30 mm
Module area 1.998 m² 2.701 m² 0.703 m² apart
Weight 24.6 kg 28.1 kg -3.5 kg for 48TD-460
Weight per kWp 53.5 kg/kWp 46.1 kg/kWp -7.4 kg/kWp for 66TM-610
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 25 yrs 12 yrs +13 yrs for 48TD-460
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 144 132 12 cells apart
Bifacial Yes No Yes vs No
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#1,919 vs #3,658
48TD-460 leads by 1,739 places
Power density
#1,876 vs #3,729
48TD-460 leads by 1,853 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165 vs #2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#7,436 vs #971
66TM-610 leads by 6,465 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#5,285 vs #3,201
66TM-610 leads by 2,084 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Canadian Solar CS6.2-48TD-460 vs Canadian Solar CS6.2-66TM-635
14 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Canadian Solar CS6.2-48TD-460 vs Canadian Solar CS6.2-66TM-630
14 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Canadian Solar CS6.2-48TD-460 vs Canadian Solar CS6.2-66TM-625
12 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Canadian Solar CS6.2-48TD-460 vs Canadian Solar CS6.2-66TM-620
12 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Canadian Solar CS6.2-48TD-460 vs Canadian Solar CS6.2-66TM-615
13 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Canadian Solar CS6.2-48TD-460 vs Canadian Solar CS6W-600T
11 differences, the largest is rated power
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Canadian Solar CS6.2-48TD-460 or Canadian Solar CS6.2-66TM-610?
According to our database: Canadian Solar CS6.2-48TD-460 has higher module efficiency (23.00% vs 22.60%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Canadian Solar CS6.2-48TD-460 and Canadian Solar CS6.2-66TM-610?
Canadian Solar CS6.2-48TD-460 has a module efficiency of 23.00%, while Canadian Solar CS6.2-66TM-610 is 22.60%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Canadian Solar CS6.2-48TD-460 use vs Canadian Solar CS6.2-66TM-610?
Canadian Solar CS6.2-48TD-460 uses TOPCon cells; Canadian Solar CS6.2-66TM-610 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Canadian Solar CS6.2-48TD-460 and Canadian Solar CS6.2-66TM-610?
Canadian Solar CS6.2-48TD-460 has a 30 years power warranty; Canadian Solar CS6.2-66TM-610 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Canadian Solar CS6.2-48TD-460 and Canadian Solar CS6.2-66TM-610 bifacial panels?
Canadian Solar CS6.2-48TD-460 is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Canadian Solar CS6.2-66TM-610 is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.

Shop prices: See 39 Canadian Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.