Skip to main content
580 vs 595 14 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

BYD NLBK-36 580 vs BYD NLBK-36 595

BYD NLBK-36 580
BYD
NLBK-36 580
580 Wp 22.45 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
BYD NLBK-36 595
BYD
NLBK-36 595
595 Wp 23.03 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

595 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.58 pp more efficient. 14 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 5 differences
How alike are they
14 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

5 of 19 parameters
Parameter 580 595 Difference
Module efficiency 22.45 % 23.03 % 0.58 pp more efficient
Power density 224.5 Wp/m² 230.3 Wp/m² 5.8 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 580 Wp 595 Wp 15 W more power
Open-circuit voltage 52.69 V 54.02 V 1.33 V apart
Voltage at max power 43.18 V 45.18 V 2.00 V apart
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Declared annual degradation, with a 1.0% first-year loss assumed for both panels because at least one datasheet omits it, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.278 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
580
19,460 kWh
595
19,963 kWh
Lifetime gap
503 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 580 595
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 580 W 595 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.8% of rated power 556 W 570 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.7% of rated power 532 W 545 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.5% of rated power 507 W 521 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 580 595 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 580 Wp 595 Wp +15 W for 595
Module efficiency 22.45 % 23.03 % +0.58 pp for 595
Power density 224.5 Wp/m² 230.3 Wp/m² +5.8 Wp/m² for 595
Open-circuit voltage 52.69 V 54.02 V 1.33 V apart
Voltage at max power 43.18 V 45.18 V 2.00 V apart
Short-circuit current 13.86 A 13.63 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 13.43 A 13.17 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.278 %/°C -0.278 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2278x1134x30 mm 2278x1134x30 mm Same
Module area 2.583 m² 2.583 m² Same
Weight 32.0 kg 32.0 kg Same
Weight per kWp 55.2 kg/kWp 53.8 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 144 144 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#4,620 vs #1,744
595 leads by 2,876 places
Power density
#4,547 vs #1,758
595 leads by 2,789 places
Heat behaviour
#1,295 vs #1,295
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#9,588 vs #7,849
595 leads by 1,739 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#4,564 vs #3,341
595 leads by 1,223 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
BYD
BYD NLBK-36 580 vs BYD NLBK-36 600
5 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
BYD
BYD NLBK-36 580 vs BYD NLBK-36 590
5 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
BYD
BYD NLBK-36 580 vs BYD NLBK-36 585
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
BYD
BYD NLBK-36 580 vs BYD NLBK-36 575
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
BYD
BYD NLBK-36 580 vs BYD NLBK-36 570
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
BYD
BYD NLBK-36 580 vs BYD HSBK-33-735
13 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: BYD NLBK-36 580 or BYD NLBK-36 595?
According to our database: BYD NLBK-36 595 has higher module efficiency (23.03% vs 22.45%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of BYD NLBK-36 580 and BYD NLBK-36 595?
BYD NLBK-36 580 has a module efficiency of 22.45%, while BYD NLBK-36 595 is 23.03%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does BYD NLBK-36 580 use vs BYD NLBK-36 595?
BYD NLBK-36 580 uses TOPCon cells; BYD NLBK-36 595 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on BYD NLBK-36 580 and BYD NLBK-36 595?
BYD NLBK-36 580 has a 30 years power warranty; BYD NLBK-36 595 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are BYD NLBK-36 580 and BYD NLBK-36 595 bifacial panels?
Both BYD NLBK-36 580 and BYD NLBK-36 595 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.