Skip to main content
HSBK-33-735 vs NLBK-36 570 6 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

BYD HSBK-33-735 vs BYD NLBK-36 570

BYD HSBK-33-735
BYD
HSBK-33-735
735 Wp 23.66 % HJT Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
BYD NLBK-36 570
BYD
NLBK-36 570
570 Wp 22.07 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

HSBK-33-735 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 1.59 pp more efficient. 6 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 13 differences
How alike are they
6 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

13 of 19 parameters
Parameter HSBK-33-735 NLBK-36 570 Difference
Module efficiency 23.66 % 22.07 % 1.59 pp more efficient
Temperature coefficient -0.240 %/°C -0.278 %/°C 0.038 %/°C better in heat
Rated power 735 Wp 570 Wp 165 W more power
Power density 236.6 Wp/m² 220.7 Wp/m² 16.0 Wp/m² higher
Weight 38.3 kg 32.0 kg 6.3 kg lighter
Short-circuit current 18.44 A 13.74 A 4.70 A apart
Module area 3.106 m² 2.583 m² 0.523 m² apart
Weight per kWp 52.1 kg/kWp 56.1 kg/kWp 4.0 kg/kWp lighter
Cell technology HJT TOPCon HJT vs TOPCon
Current at max power 17.34 A 13.32 A 4.02 A apart
Cell count 132 144 12 cells apart
Open-circuit voltage 50.47 V 52.06 V 1.59 V apart
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 2278x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm vs 2278x1134x30 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Declared annual degradation, with a 1.0% first-year loss assumed for both panels because at least one datasheet omits it, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
HSBK-33-735
24,661 kWh
NLBK-36 570
19,125 kWh
Lifetime gap
5,536 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario HSBK-33-735 NLBK-36 570
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 735 W 570 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.8% of rated power 709 W 546 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.7% of rated power 682 W 522 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.5% of rated power 656 W 499 W
03

Full specification

Parameter HSBK-33-735 NLBK-36 570 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 735 Wp 570 Wp +165 W for HSBK-33-735
Module efficiency 23.66 % 22.07 % +1.59 pp for HSBK-33-735
Power density 236.6 Wp/m² 220.7 Wp/m² +16.0 Wp/m² for HSBK-33-735
Open-circuit voltage 50.47 V 52.06 V 1.59 V apart
Voltage at max power 42.41 V 42.80 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 18.44 A 13.74 A 4.70 A apart
Current at max power 17.34 A 13.32 A 4.02 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.240 %/°C -0.278 %/°C +0.038 %/°C for HSBK-33-735
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 2278x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm vs 2278x1134x30 mm
Module area 3.106 m² 2.583 m² 0.523 m² apart
Weight 38.3 kg 32.0 kg -6.3 kg for NLBK-36 570
Weight per kWp 52.1 kg/kWp 56.1 kg/kWp -4.0 kg/kWp for HSBK-33-735
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology HJT TOPCon HJT vs TOPCon
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 144 12 cells apart
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#602 vs #6,136
HSBK-33-735 leads by 5,534 places
Power density
#582 vs #6,058
HSBK-33-735 leads by 5,476 places
Heat behaviour
#13 vs #1,295
HSBK-33-735 leads by 1,282 places
Weight
#5,576 vs #10,413
HSBK-33-735 leads by 4,837 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#244 vs #5,309
HSBK-33-735 leads by 5,065 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
BYD
BYD HSBK-33-735 vs BYD HSBK-33-730
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
BYD
BYD HSBK-33-735 vs BYD HSBK-33-725
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
BYD
BYD HSBK-33-735 vs BYD HSBK-33-720
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
BYD
BYD HSBK-33-735 vs BYD HSBK-33-715
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
BYD
BYD HSBK-33-735 vs BYD HSBK-33-710
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
BYD
BYD HSBK-33-735 vs BYD HSBK-33-705
6 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: BYD HSBK-33-735 or BYD NLBK-36 570?
According to our database: BYD HSBK-33-735 has higher module efficiency (23.66% vs 22.07%); BYD HSBK-33-735 tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.240%/°C vs -0.278%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of BYD HSBK-33-735 and BYD NLBK-36 570?
BYD HSBK-33-735 has a module efficiency of 23.66%, while BYD NLBK-36 570 is 22.07%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does BYD HSBK-33-735 use vs BYD NLBK-36 570?
BYD HSBK-33-735 uses HJT cells; BYD NLBK-36 570 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on BYD HSBK-33-735 and BYD NLBK-36 570?
BYD HSBK-33-735 has a 30 years power warranty; BYD NLBK-36 570 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are BYD HSBK-33-735 and BYD NLBK-36 570 bifacial panels?
Both BYD HSBK-33-735 and BYD NLBK-36 570 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.