710 vs 725 16 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

BYD HSBK-33-710 vs BYD HSBK-33-725

Q: Which panel is better: BYD HSBK-33-710 or BYD HSBK-33-725?

According to our database: BYD HSBK-33-725 has higher module efficiency (23.34% vs 22.86%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.

Q: What is the efficiency of BYD HSBK-33-710 and BYD HSBK-33-725?

BYD HSBK-33-710 has a module efficiency of 22.86%, while BYD HSBK-33-725 is 23.34%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.

Q: What cell technology does BYD HSBK-33-710 use vs BYD HSBK-33-725?

BYD HSBK-33-710 uses HJT cells; BYD HSBK-33-725 uses HJT. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.

Q: What is the warranty on BYD HSBK-33-710 and BYD HSBK-33-725?

BYD HSBK-33-710 has a 30 years power warranty; BYD HSBK-33-725 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.

Q: Are BYD HSBK-33-710 and BYD HSBK-33-725 bifacial panels?

Both BYD HSBK-33-710 and BYD HSBK-33-725 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

BYD

HSBK-33-710

710 Wp 22.86 % HJT Bifacial

Open panel page Datasheet PDF

BYD

HSBK-33-725

725 Wp 23.34 % HJT Bifacial

Open panel page Datasheet PDF

The verdict

725 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.48 pp more efficient. 16 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 3 differences

How alike are they

16 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical

identical differs

What actually differs

3 of 19 parameters

Parameter 710 725 Difference

Module efficiency 22.86 % 23.34 % 0.48 pp more efficient

Power density 228.6 Wp/m² 233.4 Wp/m² 4.8 Wp/m² higher

Rated power 710 Wp 725 Wp 15 W more power

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production

Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year

Cell temperature

Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.240 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.

710

23,822 kWh

725

24,325 kWh

Lifetime gap

503 kWh

Output when it is hot

Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees

Scenario 710 725

Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 710 W 725 W

Cool, bright day 40 °C 96.4% of rated power 684 W 699 W

Typical summer roof 55 °C 92.8% of rated power 659 W 673 W

Hot roof 70 °C 89.2% of rated power 633 W 647 W

Full specification

Parameter 710 725 Difference

Power and efficiency

Rated power 710 Wp 725 Wp +15 W for 725

Module efficiency 22.86 % 23.34 % +0.48 pp for 725

Power density 228.6 Wp/m² 233.4 Wp/m² +4.8 Wp/m² for 725

Open-circuit voltage 49.97 V 50.27 V Effectively the same

Voltage at max power 41.96 V 42.23 V Effectively the same

Short-circuit current 17.99 A 18.26 A Effectively the same

Current at max power 16.93 A 17.18 A Effectively the same

Temperature

Temperature coefficient -0.240 %/°C -0.240 %/°C Same

Mechanical

Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 2384x1303x33 mm Same

Module area 3.106 m² 3.106 m² Same

Weight 38.3 kg 38.3 kg Same

Weight per kWp 53.9 kg/kWp 52.8 kg/kWp Effectively the same

Warranty and degradation

Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same

Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same

Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same

Technology

Cell technology HJT HJT Same

Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same

Cell count 132 132 Same

Bifacial Yes Yes Same

Against the whole database

14,005 panels

Efficiency

#2,536 vs #943

725 leads by 1,593 places

Power density

#2,474 vs #936

725 leads by 1,538 places

Heat behaviour

#13 vs #13

Tied - the same position in the database

Weight

#8,122 vs #6,514

725 leads by 1,608 places

Warranty

#21 vs #21

Tied - the same position in the database

Overall

#855 vs #403

725 leads by 452 places

More useful comparisons

Open the full database

Same series, other bin

BYD

BYD HSBK-33-710 vs BYD HSBK-33-735

3 differences, the largest is module efficiency

Same series, other bin

BYD

BYD HSBK-33-710 vs BYD HSBK-33-730

3 differences, the largest is module efficiency

Same series, other bin

BYD

BYD HSBK-33-710 vs BYD HSBK-33-720

3 differences, the largest is module efficiency

Same series, other bin

BYD

BYD HSBK-33-710 vs BYD HSBK-33-715

The same specification on paper

Same series, other bin

BYD

BYD HSBK-33-710 vs BYD HSBK-33-705

The same specification on paper

Same series, other bin

BYD

BYD HSBK-33-710 vs BYD HSBK-33-700

3 differences, the largest is module efficiency

Written summary

Checking cache...

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: BYD HSBK-33-710 or BYD HSBK-33-725?

According to our database: BYD HSBK-33-725 has higher module efficiency (23.34% vs 22.86%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.

What is the efficiency of BYD HSBK-33-710 and BYD HSBK-33-725?

BYD HSBK-33-710 has a module efficiency of 22.86%, while BYD HSBK-33-725 is 23.34%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.

What cell technology does BYD HSBK-33-710 use vs BYD HSBK-33-725?

BYD HSBK-33-710 uses HJT cells; BYD HSBK-33-725 uses HJT. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.

What is the warranty on BYD HSBK-33-710 and BYD HSBK-33-725?

BYD HSBK-33-710 has a 30 years power warranty; BYD HSBK-33-725 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.

Are BYD HSBK-33-710 and BYD HSBK-33-725 bifacial panels?

Both BYD HSBK-33-710 and BYD HSBK-33-725 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.